Try nearly 10 (the seat was introduced in 1996, although pitch was increased in 2002/2003).
Expect a new seat announcement either slightly before or after bankruptcy exit. Word is there are vendors out there that have new innovations in C-seats custom designed for us. We just have to pick.
Which is good. I'd hate for us to go with an old flat-bed product like SQ's SpaceBed, which is currently on the p.s. 757s. That product just plane sucks compared to today's offerings. It was only chosen for p.s. because of low price...
TonyBurr From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1048 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3673 times:
Actually I like UA's C seat. I have flown the new ones on LH and SQ, and although they recline more they are definitely less comfortable then UA's C. What I like about UA's C, which is not possible on LH or SQ, is that you can adjust/recline the back and leg rest separately. On SQ and LH the seat sets its own recline and you cannot say put the back down a bit, and the legs rest up abut. It seems to be all or nothing.
A fully reclining C on UA would be nice, but PLEASE not like SQ or LH!!!!!
Goodmanr From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 297 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3631 times:
Quoting TonyBurr (Reply 2): Actually I like UA's C seat. I have flown the new ones on LH and SQ
I too like UA's C seat, although they are starting to become slightly worn...I have no problems with the new LH seat, although I had none with the old seat, but lie flat are definitely always welcome as far as I am concerned.
MCIFlyer From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3564 times:
Quoting AirxLiban (Reply 4): I understand that UA's C Class is considered to be quite comfortable and still good for a night's rest despite the fact that it is not lieflat etc...is that an accurate statement?
Yes, in fact, the last time I flew UA C-class was SFO-NRT-BKK-NRT-LAX about two years ago, and the seats were pretty good. Long flights indeed.
Original reason for asking: the wife and I are flying from ORD to SGN (via HKG) late May of 2006 in C, and I just wonder if that 15:20 ORD-HKG leg in a 744 is going to be any better the next time....
I've seen LH and SQ C seats, and while I've never sat in them, I too hope that UA's new C seats aren't like them! The ability to independently adjust the back and the legrests on UA's C seats are a bonus, but I really like the idea of sleeping for 8 hours or so on a flat seat (and when I say "flat", I mean "flat", not "flat on a downward angle".
So, the big question, I guess, is "when will UA emerge from bankruptcy?" Jeez...we've never heard any speculation like that here before, have we?
PA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2035 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 3529 times:
I've flown UA C class quite a bit. Although I like LH service, I've found the UA C class seat is far more comfortable than even the new LH C class lie-flat seat. Last time I flew the SFOMUC, I kept getting bumped because although the armrest folds flat to give you more room, the aisle seats leave you exposed to clumsy fellow passengers. Also, the angle of the LH lie-flat is a bit too steep to be comfortable. I kept sliding down and giving myself a wedgie. I'm more than happy to keep the UA seat - no complaints whatsoever.