Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Joe Barton's Double Standard On Wright Amdt  
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1671 times:

Congressman Joe Barton has been quite adamant in his support of keeping the Wright Amendment in place.

Last week, he spoke before a group of telecommunications folks and discussed his strong support for repealing rural telephone subsidies. As excerpted from the 8/5 Dallas Morning News article:

He gave only a few details about what might be in it, but he said his goal is to expand competition among telephone companies, cable companies and other telecommunications providers.

"I believe in free markets. I believe in individual opportunity. I believe in free-market capitalism. I believe in a level playing field. I believe in the future," said Mr. Barton, speaking to the Metroplex Technology Business Council in Richardson.

"So if you want a telecommunications bill that comes out in this Congress that protects vested interests, preserves the status quo, stymies entrepreneurship, I'm not your guy," he said.


The obvious question then becomes "why doesn't he feel the same way about the Wright Amendment?"

He has a local town hall meeting scheduled during the August congressional recess, and I can't wait to hear his rationale on this glaring contradiction...

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyingTexan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

Quite powerful = using one’s own words against him.

Quoting Congressman Joe Barton (R-TX):
I believe in free markets.

Well, then Set Love Free, Congressman Barton!


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 984 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1632 times:

Hasn't Barton made an about-face on the W.A.? I know Tom Delay has, but I thought another influintial person had as well...

User currently offlineJayDavis From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2000 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1629 times:

He seems to be one of the WORST at talking out of both sides of his mouth.

He also acts like he is a "tree-hugger" yet if I'm not mistaken, he represents all the people in the Midlothian area and this area is one of the major sources of air pollution which affects the air quality in the DFW area due to all the cement factories located in Midlothian. He is ALWAYS defending the cement factories while the general public has tried and tried to make these polluting companies reduce the amount of pollution they spew into the air.


User currently offlineSWALoveField From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 179 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1631 times:

OPNLguy, I'd love to be at that town hall meeting.

You have dates and times?

Robb
Dallas, TX

Wright Is Wrong!


User currently offlineLt-AWACS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1614 times:

Quoting JayDavis (Reply 3):
He seems to be one of the WORST at talking out of both sides of his mouth.

In America, we like to call those politicians...  Wink
And I want to be one LOL.

Nice find OPNL.

Ciao, and Hook 'em Horns,
Capt-AWACS, Future Houston Mayor


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1594 times:

Quoting SWALoveField (Reply 4):
OPNLguy, I'd love to be at that town hall meeting.

You have dates and times?

Five meetings, all on Saturday August 27th...

Ellis County
0900 am
Ennis City Hall
115 West Brown

Navarro County
1030 am
Corsicana City Hall
200 North 12th St.

Limestone County
100 pm
Mexia Public Library
305 East Rusk

Leon County
300 pm
Buffalo EMS Community Room
249 Greg St.

Red Oak
600 pm
Red Oak Municipal Center
200 Lakeview Center

Quoting Lt-AWACS (Reply 5):
Nice find OPNL.

Much too perfect to pass up...  Wink


User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1538 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1589 times:

Quoting OPNLguy (Thread starter):
The obvious question then becomes "why doesn't he feel the same way about the Wright Amendment?"

Wright does not usurp the ability of an air carrier to compete in the DFW marketplace. It restricts the venue at which competition can be fielded.



With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1586 times:

From the 8/10 Dallas Morning News letters to the editor section:

Calling Joe Barton

Re: "Barton seeks repeal of rural service rule – Subsidies are unfair to urban callers, congressman says," by Terry Maxon, Saturday Business story.

I was delighted to read U.S. Rep. Joe Barton's speech to the Metroplex Technology Business Council supporting "free markets ... individual opportunity ... free-market capitalism ... and a level playing field."

Based on those professions, certainly he will support the repeal of the Wright amendment, eh?

Frank B. Wright, Dallas


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1582 times:

Quoting Aaway (Reply 7):
Wright does not usurp the ability of an air carrier to compete in the DFW marketplace. It restricts the venue at which competition can be fielded.

You realize the contradiction inherent in that statement, right?  Yeah sure

Free markets that have conditions and other impediments really aren't "free"...

But, back to the topic, I'm interested in hearing Barton's explanation of his double-speak....


User currently offlineFlyingTexan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1570 times:

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 8):
Based on those professions, certainly he will support the repeal of the Wright amendment, eh?

Frank B. Wright, Dallas

The irony of that name.


User currently offlineVegasplanes From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 778 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 8):

Based on those professions, certainly he will support the repeal of the Wright amendment, eh?

Frank B. Wright, Dallas



Quoting FlyingTexan (Reply 10):

The irony of that name.

Jim Wright have a son by any chance?  Wink


User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1538 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1548 times:

Quoting Aaway (Reply 7):
Wright does not usurp the ability of an air carrier to compete in the DFW marketplace. It restricts the venue at which competition can be fielded



Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 9):
You realize the contradiction inherent in that statement, right?

I'm assuming you mean paragraph two. Perhaps this would be a contradiction if you consider local airports as competitors. But, as been expounded upon by 7E7, and mentioned by myself and others, multi airports systems are intended to complement each other. Wright attempted to preserve the intended complementary function of DAL vis-a-vis DFW.

Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 9):
Free markets that have conditions and other impediments really aren't "free"...

...yet somehow this current effort to re-open the present-day DAL to long haul exemplifies the free market at work?
 sarcastic 



With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
User currently offlineCjpark From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1266 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1500 times:

http://voip-blog.tmcnet.com/blog/ric...gn-telecom-bill-talking-points.pdf

What is really funny about this thread? Do you know who the Senate sponsor of the Telecom Bill is?

Ever hear of this guy called Ensign?

Before you blast Barton go and read what is at stake first. Removing Federal Subsidies from the Rural Telecoms is designed to force them to sell access to thier Copper so rural residents will have ADSL, ViOP and newer technologies available to them.



"Any airline that wants to serve the [region] can go to DFW today and fly anywhere they want," WN spokesman Ed Stewart
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1466 times:

Quoting Cjpark (Reply 13):
Before you blast Barton go and read what is at stake first. Removing Federal Subsidies from the Rural Telecoms is designed to force them to sell access to thier Copper so rural residents will have ADSL, ViOP and newer technologies available to them.

Sorry, but this thread isn't about the merits of the telcom bill, it's about Barton's double standard when it comes free-market competition.

Nice try on trying to get the thread off on a meaningless tangent...


User currently offlineCjpark From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1266 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1449 times:

Why is it so hard for you to understand that as long as the airlines depend upon the public domain for facitlities to operate from there is no such thing as a complete free market for airlines? Regulation concerning to and where you can fly from is still present even after the Airline Dergulation Act.


"Any airline that wants to serve the [region] can go to DFW today and fly anywhere they want," WN spokesman Ed Stewart
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1429 times:

Quoting Aaway (Reply 12):
Wright attempted to preserve the intended complementary function of DAL vis-a-vis DFW.

Now there's the biggest piece of Southwest propoganda I've heard.

Wright was intended to restrict operations out of Love Field -- which would have been closed to commercial traffic except for Southwest's legal manuverings -- to an area a bit larger than Southwest's scope of operation in the regulated era.

There was no "complementary" about it. Love wasn't supposed to have commercial traffic.

Steve


User currently offlineAaway From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1538 posts, RR: 14
Reply 17, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1417 times:

Steve,
Don't misread my statement which I purposely moderated. While I'm anti-Wright, I also am diametrically opposed to the current effort to repeal Wright since it would convey a market to the potential exclusion of others.



With a choice between changing one's mind & proving there's no need to do so, most everyone gets busy on the proof.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FAA Signs Off On Wright posted Tue Oct 17 2006 01:35:08 by Utapao
Dallas Mayor Laura Miller: No Vote On Wright Today posted Wed Jun 14 2006 20:52:53 by KarlB737
Interesting Mike Boyd Article On Wright Amendment posted Thu Jun 1 2006 05:44:14 by Apodino
LH Goes Double Daily On FRA-EWR posted Thu Apr 6 2006 13:11:54 by DABVF
New Pro-Wright Amdt Group--Oh Brother! -3- posted Wed Apr 5 2006 23:38:50 by OPNLguy
New Pro-Wright Amdt Group--Oh Brother! -2- posted Wed Mar 29 2006 20:41:00 by OPNLguy
New Pro-Wright Amdt Group--Oh Brother! posted Tue Mar 21 2006 18:16:07 by OPNLguy
Winglets Standard On 744's? posted Thu Nov 10 2005 22:25:11 by YV136C
Senate Hearing On Wright Nov. 10 - Webcast posted Mon Nov 7 2005 19:42:00 by Aloha717200
Texas Monthly On Wright Is Wrong posted Mon Oct 10 2005 21:30:57 by FlyingTexan