Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Mexicana B752 On The Atlantic, Heading For JFK!  
User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3240 posts, RR: 11
Posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1888 times:

Just heard 'N764MX' on the Pond heading westbound. Routing Stansted to JFK, reason unknown.

Go get it!  yes 

RK

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3240 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1838 times:

Just looked up some fpln info on this and found this from yesterday - 11th.

'XXU103' KJFK-EGSS N764MX B752. To be reg'd N403JS for Atlantic Express.

Is this a proving run for yet another Atlantic LCC?  confused 

RK

User currently offlineLatinAviation From Ireland, joined Nov 2003, 1261 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1784 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes, I believe so. This is one of three 757s they're acquiring. Per Airways News Online, it was delivered July 9.
07/09/2005 Atlantic Express 757-2Q8 N403JS 27351/LN 639 LF ILFC 7/05 ex N764MX (new listing)

User currently offlineLatinAviation From Ireland, joined Nov 2003, 1261 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1768 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I should have realized this before, "Atlantic Express" is "Eos Airlines", which has been discussed here before. Here is a recent DOT filing-
http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf92/339703_web.pdf

User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3240 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1733 times:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but N764MX isn't ETOPS certified so how do they plan to operate an Atlantic service?

 confused 

RK

PS. thanks for the info LA.

User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3240 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1721 times:

The financial docs at the bottom of the Adobe link make interesting viewing  yes .

User currently offlineJFKviaPHX From United States, joined Feb 2004, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1686 times:

It was sitting on the hard stand at T4 for a few weeks. The other day the aircraft departed from JFK (Tuesday around 2000 or so.) The aircraft is all white. I was wondering who's aircraft it was until I saw the ads in the Airport Press for Eos now hiring at JFK.

User currently offlineN405MX From Mexico, joined May 2004, 1289 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (4 years 3 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1571 times:

N764MX leaved MX about march this year, it was returned to the lessor and stored in the Us until they found a new operator. The aircraft leave MEX all white with only the reg.

Cheers


Life is what happens when you have other plans.....
User currently offlineBrido From United States, joined Mar 2000, 160 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (4 years 3 months 18 hours ago) and read 1371 times:

Quoting RobK (Reply 4):
orrect me if I'm wrong, but N764MX isn't ETOPS certified so how do they plan to operate an Atlantic service?
 
RK

Question: Is a particular AIRPLANE certified for ETOPS, or is it the OPERATION? Can you tell by the reg number or former operator?

Also in this case the aircraft came from Mexico. They don't do ETOPS in the same way we do. I don't believe this has any bearing on Eos' ability to operate as an ETOPS carrier.

Thanks for any clarification.

User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3240 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (4 years 3 months 13 hours ago) and read 1215 times:

Sorry Brido, I have no idea in what's involved making an non-ETOPS aircraft an ETOPS one.

I've always thought that once an aircraft becomes ETOPS certified then that stays with the aircraft, but in reality I'm only guessing. Perhaps someone with more superior knowledge than ourselves could clarify for us?

 yes 

RK

User currently offlineN770WD From United States, joined Sep 2004, 110 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (4 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 1103 times:

There are four basic components to ETOPS:

(1) Aircraft (having an aircraft that meets ETOPS regulations, including cargo hold fire suppression, backup systems, satellite communications capabilities, rafts, etc.)

(2) Crews (having cockpit crews and dispatchers trained and fluent in ETOPS procedures)

(3) Maintenance (maintaining the aircraft to ETOPS standards, including separate engine inspections, special pre-departure checks, etc.) and

(4) Experience (showng reliability and safety by operating to ETOPS standards on non-ETOPS routings for a period of time).

In the US, ETOPS is a guideline, determined by Advisory Circular AC 120-42. It is not a regulation, and therefore the implementation of ETOPS by carrier is based somewhat on the judgment of the local certificate-holding office.

It IS possible to fly the Atlantic routes without ETOPS capabilities. The aircraft must stay 60 minutes from an approved and available alternate airport. This means there are two critical en-route facilities for transatlantic crossings: Sondre Stromfjord (BGSF) and Keflavik. During the summer months, this adds flight time. During the winter months, if conditions at either SFJ or KEF drop below minimums, it can delay the flight.

There should be more coordination among FAA, JAA and ICAO regarding ETOPS qualification procedures. It is generally believed that ETOPS qualification for a startup is more difficult in the US than in Europe. While there is nothing in the regulations that would prohibit a US-flag startup from having ETOPS out of the box, there is language in FAA materials that suggests as much as a year's experience is required to prove reliability before ETOPS is granted. America West has been trying for more than a year to achieve ETOPS/180 on their 757 fleet to be able to operate PHX-Hawaii.

User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3240 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (4 years 3 months 2 hours ago) and read 1068 times:

Interesting. Thanks for that.

 yes 

RK

User currently offlineBrido From United States, joined Mar 2000, 160 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 938 times:

To clarify:

Atlantic Express/Eos is not a LCC.

Far from it.

http://www.EosAirlines.com

User currently offlineRobK From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3240 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 977 times:

Quoting Brido (Reply 12):
To clarify:

Atlantic Express/Eos is not a LCC.

Far from it.

http://www.EosAirlines.com

You're right, it isn't. I hadn't realised that. So if the aircraft is not ETOPS certified then like N770WD says, that's going to mean some lengthy flights as they're gonna have to go close to Iceland and Greenland and that most certainly isn't the quickest way from STN to JFK!

What are they going to do if the(ir one) aircraft goes u/s though?

Somehow I can't see this service lasting very long at all BUT I wish them success with it along with the MaxJet bloke.  yes 

RK  spin 

User currently offlineCdeanda From Mexico, joined Feb 2001, 84 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 852 times:

Quoting N405MX (Reply 7):
N764MX leaved MX about march this year, it was returned to the lessor and stored in the Us

I saw N764MX and N755MX while I was doing a X-country to Abbotsford Intl CYXX / YXX in early May 2005. I was surprised to see them so I visited the control tower to have a better view and ask about the two planes without getting any accurate response.

At the end I sent an e-mail to Cascade Aerospace and they told me they received the planes to make some small interior modifications for Atlantic Express. They were also expecting a 3rd 757 by that time.

Cheers,

Carlos de Anda

User currently offlineMir From United States, joined Jan 2004, 12981 posts, RR: 65
Reply 15, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 829 times:

Are you sure it was Mexicana? Wouldn't a Mexicana plane be registered in Mexico?

-Mir


NaNoWriMo 2008 -- 51,156! Win!
User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 4950 posts, RR: 49
Reply 16, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 823 times:

Not necessarily. There are planes used by Mexican carriers registered in the U.S. and in Europe. It depends on the leases or the financing.

User currently offlineN405MX From Mexico, joined May 2004, 1289 posts, RR: 12
Reply 17, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 766 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 15):
Wouldn't a Mexicana plane be registered in Mexico?

Depends on the cost for the reg and the lease contract, some buses are F- registered (F-OHMK) or N registered (N405MX) because it was cheapper than get an XA- reg.

Cheers


Life is what happens when you have other plans.....
User currently offlineMir From United States, joined Jan 2004, 12981 posts, RR: 65
Reply 18, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 740 times:

Ok. I just thought that US registrations would be more expensive to get than Mexican ones. I guess not in all cases.

-Mir


NaNoWriMo 2008 -- 51,156! Win!
User currently offlineJuventus From United States, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 615 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

NOOOOOOOOO. Don't take Mexicana's 757s away.

User currently offlineN801DM From United States, joined Sep 2004, 86 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (4 years 2 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 505 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

When a foreign operated airline has a US registered aircraft the maintenance programs have to be approved by the FAA. Often a FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector gets assigned to these operators and they do ramp checks on the aircraft when they get a chance. Along with the FAA approved program all maintenance log entries must be made in English.

I hope this is of some help,

N801DM

Fly Safe!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
GFK, BIS, More On The Chopping Block For NW Cuts posted Wed Aug 17 2005 12:35:00 by AviatorTJ
Fewer Windows On The A380 - Bad For Passengers? posted Sun Apr 24 2005 06:29:09 by A380900
747-100s On The Atlantic posted Wed Mar 22 2000 03:10:01 by C-FTOD
Rvsm Other Than On The Atlantic posted Sat Jan 22 2000 07:22:37 by Buff
Are New Planes On The Way For Virgin Atlantic? posted Thu Jun 22 2006 04:00:47 by Ctang
Korean Air On The Way For 747-8s posted Sat Oct 28 2006 23:47:48 by FCKC
Will Fliers Pay For Extra Space On The 787? posted Fri May 26 2006 19:41:01 by BoomBoom
Go Running On The JFK Runway posted Mon Apr 3 2006 23:33:16 by NYCFlyer
Hutchinson's Push For Compromise On The WA posted Thu Mar 2 2006 23:55:09 by Cjpark
On The News: New Airport For NYC? posted Tue Feb 14 2006 08:36:12 by Rampart