Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
B777-300: Why 50m$ More Expensive Than B747-400?  
User currently offlineVfw614 From Germany, joined Dec 2001, 3964 posts, RR: 5
Posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4096 times:

According to Boeing's list prices, the Boeing 747-400 comes at a handy 205m US$ while the Boeing 777-300 is almost 50m US$ more expensive. Why ? Is it just demand and supply or is producing the T7 much more expensive than the B744, including the need to write-off development costs ?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4088 times:

Because it's in greater demand...basic economics  Wink

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4065 times:

Boeing needs to keep the B-747 production line going, at least until the B-747-ADV gets launched. I expect that before the end of this year.  bigthumbsup 

So, the B-747-400 is "on sale" at Wal-Mart prices.  Smile


User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4048 times:

Quoting Vfw614 (Thread starter):
According to Boeing's list prices, the Boeing 747-400 comes at a handy 205m US$ while the Boeing 777-300 is almost 50m US$ more expensive. Why ? Is it just demand and supply or is producing the T7 much more expensive than the B744, including the need to write-off development costs ?

Because the 777-300/777-300ER has much better operating economics. Boeing figures that since the -300s will save the customer money, they can charge more. It's the same reason the whole 777 line costs more then the A330/A340 line.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineVfw614 From Germany, joined Dec 2001, 3964 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4038 times:

True, but airlines do their maths - and you need to earn an additional 50m quid to offset the much higher price for an aircraft that to some extent competes with its stablemate.

User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4006 times:

Quoting Vfw614 (Reply 4):
True, but airlines do their maths - and you need to earn an additional 50m quid to offset the much higher price for an aircraft that to some extent competes with its stablemate.

Well, Widebodyphotog showed how the 777-200LR saves US$13 million a year over the A350-400. It is conceivable that the 777-300/300ER saves that much over the 747-400s.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is One Way More Expensive Than Round Trip? posted Tue Nov 22 2005 14:29:38 by RootsAir
Why Is One-Way More Expensive Than Return? posted Sun Nov 7 2004 22:52:23 by SQNo1
Why Is Boeing More Expensive Than Airbus? posted Mon Sep 15 2003 05:34:06 by Ual747
Single More Expensive Than Return Tickets. Why? posted Sat Jun 21 2003 22:29:48 by SAA-SAL
Why Are One Way Tickets More Expensive Than RT posted Sat Mar 8 2003 14:50:32 by Jhooper
EasyJet More Expensive Than BA posted Sat Mar 30 2002 16:10:55 by David_itl
Why More Expensive To Fly To ORD Than Mdw? posted Thu Aug 3 2000 14:56:37 by Che
B747-400 VS B747-300 posted Mon Aug 7 2006 03:27:39 by YULYMX
Why Is STN More Popular Than LTN? posted Sat Jun 10 2006 19:25:42 by CRJ900
Douglas Aircraft More Durable Than Boeing? Why? posted Sat May 27 2006 20:04:38 by ClassicLover