Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Northwest Interested In B777-100X  
User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1953 times:

In this weeks Flight International, Boeing has named ILFC, Singapore Airlines and Northwest as being the companies showing serious interest in the new 777 "shrink" the B777-100X.

Northwest are looking to use the B777-100X to replace its fleet of 42 ageing DC-10s, Flight points out that Northwest is the only top 4 US airline not to order the 777 so far.

Interesting, could spell the end of Northwest's A330-300 order, although given Northwest's large A319/320 fleet, and the fact that the A330-300 is considerably larger than the B777-100X will be, both could be retained...

JET SETTER



11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMlsrar From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1417 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1577 times:

I would personally prefer a 777-100/200 order over the airbus from a pax comfort standpoint. As someone who mostly flies Y class, I can attest to the dimensions of the 777, which is similar to the DC-10, a few " wider is much more comfortable than the A330. I usually fly the DTW-AMS route once a week, and the ORD-DUB EI route 2x a month aboard an A330-300. I love the 10 so much more!


I mean, for the right price I’ll fight a lion. - Mike Tyson
User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12428 posts, RR: 37
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1553 times:

I really don't see the 777-100X becoming a reality; it would seem to cut right across the 767-400, which is already a little lame on the success side. As Boeing discovered with the 747SP, artificially shortened aircraft are risky and very few (the 332 being the notable exception) succeed. The 777-200ER/LR would seem to be a better choice, from an economics point of view.

As for the A330 -v- the DC10, I have to say I'm shocked. Misrair, you've spoilt my evening. How could anyone not prefer A330 flight with a very fine airline to a flight in a clapped out 20 year old DC10 on a well, let's say, not the world's greatest airline. I've flown on the A330 and I personally find it a very impressive, quiet and comfortable aircraft. What did Aer Lingus do to you?!!


User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1528 times:

Kaitak,
As I was about to go on to say in a separate post, but now won't bother since you've brought it up here, Flight says Boeing has pencilled in the first flight of the B767-400ERX and B777-100X for Aug-Dec 2003, but will most likely not carry out both programmes as they effectively compete for the same market segment.

The 767-400ER as is is range limited, less than the 767-300 and a lot less than the A330-200, to effectively compete Boeing needs something to go against the A330-200. I'd say they'll go ahead with the B777-100 and ditch the B767-400ERX.

As you point out, Boeing may shy away from shrinks, but Boeing also know what the A330-200 has done to their B767 sales!!!!
JET SETTER



User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5293 posts, RR: 61
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1527 times:

The main reason Boeing might launch the 777 100 is because of the A330 & A340. A 767 cannot compete with an A340 or A330 but a B777 obviously can (an ailrine even said that) Will it have an one less emergency exit or what?

Jeremiah Teahn



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineMlsrar From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 1417 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1525 times:

EI's service was outstanding, the aircraft was clean, well-maintained and quiet, but given the shape and interior dimensions of the aircraft, it's cramped inspite of the 2 x 4 x 2 seating. the sidewalls are curved and raked sharper so for a taller fellow like myself, it's bad news, while a -10 retains a higher height and interior height as well. just a preference, no need to ruin an evening over it...plus the CF6 engines look so menacinc when you get a head-on shot of that beautiful widebody (the DC-10 that is)


I mean, for the right price I’ll fight a lion. - Mike Tyson
User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10677 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1500 times:

As I said on a different post yesterday the 777-100 is the answer to the A330-200´s success.

Reason why Boeing will more likely go for a shrinked 777 rather than a modified 767-400: the 767 is aging, the new 767-400 is a complete sales failure so far.
And to develop both planes makes absolutely no sense to me.



User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 4161 posts, RR: 36
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1483 times:

I don´t think the B771X is a good choice for NW. This plane should be too heavy compared to the A332. My though.

Regards
Flying-Tiger
http://fly.to/rorders The regional plane orders page



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2743 posts, RR: 58
Reply 8, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1439 times:

Although at first thought, I would say the 771X would be rather poor economically. But I assumed the A332 was going to be a poor performer, and look at it's excellent performance and sales. Also, if NW ordered the 771X (with GE90) to begin replacing DC-10s, then they can easily go to the -200/ER/LR and -300/LR to eventually replace their classic 747s. The more I think about this, the more it makes since to me.

I would list the potential 771X customers as:

Northwest
ILFC
Singapore
United

And for some speculation/argumentation:

TWA
Lufthansa

Hamlet69



Honor the warriors, not the war.
User currently offlineRuscoe From Australia, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 1557 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

Add QF to the list.
Ruscoe


User currently offlineTullamarine From Australia, joined Aug 1999, 1552 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (14 years 3 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1380 times:

Even though the 777-100 would be smaller, I would have thought it still too big for SQ. Already they have said the A332 is too big and even with a shrink the 777-100 would still be around the same size as the A332.

When you consider SQ want to replace A310s, A332s or 771s seem a big step up in size.

On a separate note, I doubt QF would be interested in the 771 in the short term. This plane would replace the 763 which tend to be the youngest part of QF's fleet. Replacing the classic 747s is highest on their priority list followed by replacements for their 733s.

An Australian airline which would look at the 771 is AN. Had it not been for the continuing ownership struggles (now resolved) AN would have ordered A332's a year ago. Should this plane become a reality it would offer an alternative to the A332. AN apparently consider 772s and A333s a little too big though they will probably happily take SQ's older 772s as a stop gap measure to replace some of their ageing 767s.



717,721/2,732/3/4/5/7/8/9,742/3/4,752/3,762/3,772,W,A310,320,321,332,333,388,DC9,DC10,F28,F100,142,143,E90,CR2,D82/3/4,S
User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined exactly 15 years ago today! , 4161 posts, RR: 36
Reply 11, posted (14 years 3 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1370 times:

Forget Lufthansa being a potential customer for the 777-100X. They have said that already the A332 is too big for their operations and they are currently putting pressure on Airbus to get the A330-100 started.

Regards
Flying-Tiger
http://fly.to/rorders The regional plane orders page



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Northwest Cargo Interested In 747-400SF! posted Sun Dec 29 2002 00:31:02 by Na
SQ Interested In Direct WLG-SIN Flights posted Wed Dec 13 2006 08:13:31 by 777ER
Frontier Interested In Similar Partnerships posted Thu Dec 7 2006 20:56:43 by AirEMS
Finnair Interested In Buying Parts Of SK posted Fri Sep 29 2006 14:04:43 by LordHowe
Your Memories Of Northwest Orient In The 80's posted Fri Jul 14 2006 00:01:54 by Eastern1985
US Airways Interested In Merging With DL Or NW posted Fri Jun 30 2006 13:37:44 by Justapassenger
Reports: SU Interested In AZ Linkup-AZ Stock Up 10% posted Thu Jun 29 2006 17:03:53 by Nycfly75
Qantas Interested In 748 Dixon Says posted Wed Jun 21 2006 22:21:03 by BoomBoom
AZ May Be Interested In 30 A320s posted Tue May 30 2006 15:53:56 by Nycfly75
Jet Blue Ever Interested In SWF? posted Sun May 21 2006 02:17:55 by AlitaliaMD11