In the past I've had a number of flights showing a given position or showing information on Flytecomm which was totally erroneous.
As all of these were outside US/Canadian airspace I deduced that the information was gained from both ACARS info and radar and, when an aircraft was outside North America, the info was based on the last ACARS info passed to Flytecomm and the flightplan.
Since this panel appeared it seems that the info is only radar generated which must leave the info on trans Atlantic, Pacific and South/Central American flights based on flightplan only outside of US airspace.
FLYiCRJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 55 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 15 hours ago) and read 1751 times:
That happens to me all the time...I check with IAHCSR to see when Peter Max is coming into EWR...I check FLYTEcomm...and see that he is still in-flight..so I rush to get to EWR and he already landed. Sometimes I seen them off by 45mins to an 1 hour...in Peter Max's case...one time they were off by 3 hours...I check Flytecomm it said he had 2 hr 43 mins of flying left...I called continental and they said the plane already landed!!!
Philb From Ireland, joined May 1999, 2915 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 15 hours ago) and read 1737 times:
Two examples I had.
A couple of years ago my daughter was travelling from Dallas to Lima on AA. The flight left DFW at 10.00 pm Ireland time. I checked it airborne OK but when I looked an hour later the flight had been deleted from the database, the track trace showed as stopped about 30 minutes out fo DFW. Used to glitches I checked the AA site which still showed a Lima ETA and was continually updating. When my daughter returned she reported that on climb out from DFW they had had the PA and all the lights go out and the crew apologised saying they had accidently hit a wrong switch (circuit breaker?) and I wondered if the ACARS output had also been affected and not been re-established by Flytecomm before the aircraft entered Mexican airspace.
A second instance was a year or so ago. I was monitoring Shanwick HF when a Virgin A340 had an on board problem at around 25 West. It initially asked for diversion to SNN. I went to Flytecomm to watch it turn around. It didn't. It kept heading towards Labrador - at least on Flytecomm. As it overflew SNN I could see the aircraft which, by that time was showing well on track to Canadian airspace.
The aircraft continued to LHR and, by the time Virgin's home page had it on the gate in Terminal 3, Flytecomm had it heading down over St Anthony. Ten minutes later the aircraft appeared on the map on approach to LHR!
Ouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4651 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 months 14 hours ago) and read 1696 times:
FlyteComm is extremely poor from my experience. NEVER use it if you want to follow any diversion events - they are never listed. Flight Arrivals - though they have their small window for arrivals - is still the best with that.
Senorcarnival From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 13 hours ago) and read 1688 times:
Quoting Ouboy79 (Reply 3): FlyteComm is extremely poor from my experience. NEVER use it if you want to follow any diversion events - they are never listed. Flight Arrivals - though they have their small window for arrivals - is still the best with that.
FlyteComm processes diversions, just in their own jacked-up way. Last Tuesday, when the AF CDG - IAH flight got diverted to SAT, FlyteComm didn't show an AF arrival for SAT, but under IAH, it showed an AF SAT - IAH flight instead. So if you want to check for diversions, also check the original destination of the diverted flight. Flightarrivals is odd at times, but it is indeed more accurate within their own limited timeframes.