Sabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 6, posted (7 years 10 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2576 times:
Expedia has plenty of mistakes on their site, once I booked a DUS-CDG-BKK-MNL-BKK-CDG-DUS flight, the itinerary showed "no meal" on the CDG-BKK and BKK-CDG flight, of course I got more than only one meal. Then, according to Expedia, I should get a meal on the DUS-CDG flight... I got one but only because I was upgraded, the Eco Class - in which I was originally booked in - didn't get a meal but only drink service.
You should take sites like Expedia and Opodo, etc. not too serious, sometimes are the information incorrect.
HZ747300 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2004, 1599 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (7 years 10 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2514 times:
Quoting CV580Freak (Reply 7): Didn't you hear - EK just bought 600 of them
Where did you get your information? What's your source? Post a link!!!
Sorry, just filling in for some of the information zealouts who are probably sleeping right now...
I saw the same thing on Expedia when I was looking to go the long way back to New York at X-mas time (I like stopping London, it's one of my favorite places to visit). Travelocity is worse--on Expedia.com, Emirates is the cheapest from SYD-CHC, and when you click for a more detailed fare, the low fare is maintained. However, when I found the same fare on Travelocity, the fare jumps to A$1500 on the detail screen!!!
We're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5705 posts, RR: 21 Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2483 times:
Quoting HZ747300 (Reply 8): Sorry, just filling in for some of the information zealouts who are probably sleeping right now...
While we're at it, this has been discussed before and should be moved to the "Expedia Mistakes Spotting" forum.
PanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2603 posts, RR: 10 Reply 10, posted (7 years 10 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2375 times:
I believe it is in place of the 77W. Though I'm not sure why, as awhile back they displayed JFK-CDG on AF to be "BOEING 777-300 PASSENGER," not 727-200 as now. Weird, but whatever.
Dotcom From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 15 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (7 years 10 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2135 times:
Exactly - they pull all of this data from the GDS systems, in the case of Expedia - Worldspan. If the info is filed wrongly on these then it will appear wrong on Expedia, Travelocity etc...
ExPedia From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 49 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (7 years 10 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1989 times:
Unlikely, as the fare class associated with the seat you purchase would be Y and not J, regardless of the error in the seatmap loaded in the CRS by the carrier. And, to confirm the comment above, this would not be an Expedia problem - it sure sounds like the carrier made an error in updating the equipment type in the originating CRS (WSPN in this case).
Sponsor Message: 
From Lebanon, joined Oct 2003, 4492 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Jun 2005, 1735 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 538 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Bahrain, joined Jul 2005, 1033 posts, 
From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2004, 1599 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5705 posts, 
From Canada, joined Aug 2005, 49 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
