Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Newburgh (SWF) To New York (JFK)  
User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 9603 times:

I was checking SWFs website and noticed that in 1990 American Eagle flew between SWF and JFK and in 1992 TWA Express flew the route in 1992.

Does anyone know how the loads on the flights where?

I am sure that the flight was demolished because of Metro North. (train service)

So I doubt that there would be a market for lets say Jet Blue from JFK-SWF.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chris Wallace




No Vueling No Party
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineLeisurejet From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 43 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 9570 times:

I also noted these flights from Stewart International (SWF) to New York City(JFK), but am afraid I don't know how the loads were back then.

I would think that if jetBlue were considering flying anywhere from Stewart International (SWF), then they would probably consider one of their bases such as Boston (BOS), Washington (IAD) or Fort Lauderdale (FLL) in the east or Oakland (OAK) and Long Beach (LGB) in the west.

It does though seem that today Allegiant Air, will announce service from SWF to Orlando-Sanford (SFB) so things are looking up on the schedule flight side for the airport.

http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/a...3/BUSINESS/508230317/1003/BUSINESS


User currently offlineBigOrange From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 2365 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 9509 times:

ALLEGIANT AIR ANNOUNCES NEW NONSTOP AIR SERVICE FROM STEWART INTERNATIONAL FOR JUST $39*

From their website http://www.allegiantair.com/pr/082305.htm


User currently offlineTraindriver From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 9389 times:

For AlitaliaMD11,
I'm guessing the loads probably weren't there. I don't feel
that Metro North had much to do with it. As it is, just to
get to the nearest train station, it's about a 30 min. bus
ride to Beacon, then another hour plus to G.C.T.
After that it's probably an hour or more depending on
traffic on the overly congested NYC highways to JFK
via the bus on 42nd St. Mass transit from the Hudson Valley
region to JFK doesn't cut it. If I remember correctly, the
TW service was short lived.
Now it's probably easier to drive to ALB or HPN as WN
serves both locations than it is to tavel to LGA or JFK.
If the service was profitable, AA would still be serving JFK
instead of just flying ERJ's to ORD.


User currently offlineJFKLGANYC From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3469 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 9351 times:

U have to remember, flying was a lot different back then. Regionals did not exist, instead commuter airlines fed major airline hubs. It was very easy to fly from SWF to JFK or even ALB to JFK on Beech 1900s, J31s, or even Saabs. It is not that easy to fly these routes with regional jets.

If you look at Eagle's NE operation, or even Express Jet, you see all jets. Routes like this (that carried 10 or 20 people) just aren't doable in an RJ. I believe Express Jet flew HPN to EWR for a few months prior to 9/11. Of they announced it. Either way, it just is not efficient of cost effective in the new aviation environment.

PJ


User currently offlineHZ747300 From Hong Kong, joined Mar 2004, 1675 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 9350 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

After the AA587 crash at JFK and while JFK was closed jetBlue was landing planes at SWF and busing passengers to the city. Pretty clever I thought.


Keep on truckin'...
User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 9334 times:

Quoting HZ747300 (Reply 5):
After the AA587 crash at JFK and while JFK was closed jetBlue was landing planes at SWF and busing passengers to the city. Pretty clever I thought.

Sadly when that happend I still lived in Nyack, New York about 35 minutes from the city. I would have headed out to see those Jet Blue planes landing!

When I was in Spain a Jet Blue A320 got diverted to SWF as well during a thunderstorm apparently along with a Continental B777 and two US Airways Express ERJs.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dmitry Avdeev




I was reading the other day that Metro North is looking into bringing the train to Stewart.



No Vueling No Party
User currently offlineTraindriver From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 9293 times:

AlitaliaMD11,
The only way Metro North could get to SWF would be via the
Port Jervis line. I know that line runs along the NY Thruway
for part of the route and continues south to I think Hoboken NJ.
I don't think they run into Penn Station so it doesn't provide a
link into NYC. It might link up somewhere with the NJ Transit
line that connects with the Newark Airport service. However
it would probably be cost prohibitive to construct that link to
SWF, I can't see NY state coming up with the cash.


User currently offlineJetBlueAtJFK From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1687 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 9278 times:

Well Metro North Goes into GCT in the city and LIRR goes into Penn so SWF-JFK on a train would be annoying, if they did build a SWF train station, then it would be Metro N to GCT, then subway to Penn, then LIRR to Jamaica, then AirTrain to JFK. That is 4 different train systems and you might have to change trains for Metro North. I am sure if there was a flight from SWF-JFK it wouldn't sell though (Nowadays). But with LIRR planning (Maybe, plans might go away with MTA's financial troubles), but if the plans go through, than the LIRR will have service from Jamaica to GCT which will then cut out the subway and if Metro North gets a SWF station, then that make it a little faster. Also maybe some more flights to SWF with a train station, so a better connection to the city, so it can serve as a viable north NYC airport with NYC connections.

 airplane jetBlueAtJFK airplane 



When You Know jetBlue, You Know Better
User currently offlineGman3 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 290 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 9267 times:

Quoting Traindriver (Reply 3):
Now it's probably easier to drive to ALB or HPN as WN
serves both locations than it is to tavel to LGA or JFK

WN does not serve HPN  Smile


User currently offlineDartland From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 644 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 9247 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

HPN is pretty much the antithesis of everythng WN and vice versa.

Likely the only time you would ever see a WN plane land at HPN other than a diversion is if some WN executive had tee time at Westchester CC or Winged Foot...


User currently offlineTraindriver From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 9233 times:

To Gman3
oops!
For jetBlueAtJFK
The Metro North that goes into GCT runs down the east side of the Hudson.
I don't see them running that line into SWF as they would have to build a
bridge across the Hudson. With the tracks at river level, I don't see how
they could connect to the I-84 bridge that goes to Newburgh. The Port
Jervis line which goes through Middletown would probably be the rail line
that they would link up with.
Didn't they tout SWF as the NYC's area 4th airport when they started
commercial service out of there? I know they rebuilt the terminal about
6 or 7 years ago, but it's like a ghost town most of the time.


User currently offlineJFKviaPHX From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9207 times:

SWF to JFK would work with B6. The drive to JFK from the area is horrible unless you do it in the middle of the night. I use to live 10 mins from SWF and commute to JFK everyday. I know many people in the area that prefer SWF over everywhere else because of the ease of use. The biggest drawback to SWF are the high fares. B6 would help lower all fares out of there and make it a viable airport. I paid over $500 for a round trip from SWF to BUF in '94.

User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 9244 times:

JFKviaPHX,

I know how you feel. I live in Poughkeepsie and fly out of JFK frequently. My parents are always bothered by the 2 hour drive and they sometimes take the techonic which they hate.

Jet Blue would have to maintain some very low fares on the route though to keep the loads up. Maybe $39. MTA is about $22I think per adult.

I know my dad would probably like the route, he has to teach in the city on Mondays and Wednesdays.

The 190s would be really good for the route.

I hope that Jet Blue looks into SWF more closely. I was looking at their original plans the other day and Newburgh was not menchioned but things have changed.

jetBlue's proposed network (from JFK):

Portland, Maine
Burlington, Vermont
Rochester, New York
Buffalo, New York
Syracuse, New York
Boston, Masachusettes
Washington D.C.
Richmond, Virginia
Norfolk, Virginia
Raleigh/Durham, North Carolina
Greensboro, North Carolina
Charlotte, North Carolina
Greenville/Spartanburg, South Carolina
Columbia, South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina
Atlanta, Georgia,
Savannah, Georgia
Jacksonville, Florida
Orlando, Florida
Tampa, Florida
Ft. Myers, Florida
W. Palm Beach, Florida
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Charleston, West Virginia
Cleveland, Ohio
Columbus, Ohio
Dayton, Ohio
Cincinnati, Ohio
Canton/Akron, Ohio
Indianapolis, Indiana
Louisville, Kentucky
Chicago, Illinois
Flint, Michigan
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Nashville, Tennessee
Memphis, Tennessee
New Orleans, Louisiana
Houston, Texas
Dallas Ft. Work, Texas
Denver, Colorado
Salt Lake City, Utah
Minneapolis, Minnesota


Its strange that California was never in jet Blue's orginal network plan.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dan Pianelli




No Vueling No Party
User currently offlineJFKviaPHX From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 194 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 9143 times:

I lived in New Windsor. I would leave for work at 3:45 am and make it to JFK by 5am. Coming home at 1:30pm I would get in by 3pm. If I was to try this trip any later then 5:30 am it would take me at least 2 hours plus with all the traffic. Think about SWF. You have cheap and easy parking. Most times I would park right across from the terminal. Short trip to the airport for the people of the region. Direct access to JFK and it vast network of flights. NO TRAFFIC!

Metro North to the NYC is easy, but good luck finding parking at Beacon or any other station. SWF to JFK would be a 15-20 minute gate to gate flight and will hit connection right away 3 flights a day one at 7am (with an RON) one at 1pm and one at 6pm.


User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 9131 times:

I don't know if it would work ... historically, airlines have had a relatively difficult time making these ultra-short hops work, and when they do, they are almost exclusively for connecting passengers.

For example, CoEx used to fly EFD-IAH (and I believe HOU-IAH) on EMB-120s, which allowed passengers in southern Houston and Galveston to connect to CO flights at IAH better; this helped them compete with WN's operations at HOU. These flights have been discontinued, however, because they were not efficient to operate on RJs.

Also, United Express once operated BWI-IAD for passengers in Maryland to connect to UA flights; I believe this has been discontinued as well.

I think United Express still operates some of these types of flights in the Los Angeles area (maybe LAX-ONT?), but I'm not sure.

I doubt B6 would ever launch SWF-JFK. Like these other routes, it's probably an inefficient route for a jet aircraft. As a shuttle operation, security delays and costs would discourage commuters from flying it. I may be wrong, but I just don't see it happening.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Reply 16, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 9092 times:

Quoting Ssides (Reply 15):
I don't know if it would work ... historically, airlines have had a relatively difficult time making these ultra-short hops work, and when they do, they are almost exclusively for connecting passengers.

They tend to be very successful in Europe.



No Vueling No Party
User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 17, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 9079 times:

Quoting AlitaliaMD11 (Reply 16):
They tend to be very successful in Europe.

Where most of the routes are likely subsidized, people are less time-sensitive, and less price-sensitive.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Reply 18, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 9044 times:

I talked to my dad about the route (he's a regular commuter between Poughkeepsie and the city) and he says the route could probably profit for commuters if the flight landed in LGA instead of JFK since it is closer to the city.


No Vueling No Party
User currently offlineCOEWR787 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 337 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 8957 times:

Quoting JetBlueAtJFK (Reply 8):
Well Metro North Goes into GCT in the city and LIRR goes into Penn so SWF-JFK on a train would be annoying, if they did build a SWF train station, then it would be Metro N to GCT,

The proposed SWF connection is from the Port Jervis Line, which runs into Hoboken through Secaucus Jct. One could change at Secaucus for Penn station and then from there to JFK either via LIRR + Airtrain via Jamaica or by the A train + Airttrain via Howard Beach/JFK Airport. If the Access to Region's Core plan is ever built then there will be direct trains from Port Jervis into Penn Station.


User currently offlineAa757first From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3350 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 8945 times:

Ok, on a bad day, how long does it take to drive into the city? An hour and a half? Now tell me, is it going to be worth showing up at the airport about an hour in advance, the twenty minutes it takes to fly to the city, and get out of JFK and into the city, say thirty minutes at best. That is one hour and fifty minutes. Plus, what happens when the flight is late? It would not work.

AAndrew


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16865 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 8933 times:

There have been proposals to use either the Port Jervis line or the West Shore line (currently an active freight line) to link with SWF, the plan to build a rail connection to the Metro North Hudson line via a new Tappan Zee bridge is gone.

NY has turned their support to NJ's ARC (Access to the Regions Core) tunnel project as a way to directly link West of the Hudson NY Counties with Manhattan.

Right now there are two active passenger rail lines West of the Hudson operated by NJ Transit, there's a proposal to reactivate passenger service on a third line known as the West Shore line. As it's currently planned it would run from West Havestraw to Hoboken, however the line is active with freight all the way to Albany so they could easily extend passenger service to New Burgh, and Kingston which would make my Aunt and Uncle in Woodstock happy as they drive to Rhinecliff to catch Amtrak to Manhattan.

Access to the Region's Core (ARC)

http://www.accesstotheregionscore.com/

West Shore Line

http://www.njtransit.com/images/an_cp_proposed_west_shore_map.jpg



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16865 posts, RR: 51
Reply 22, posted (9 years 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 8932 times:

Flights to JFK on B6 would not work because there's no local traffic, it would be people connecting to flights to FLorida. If there were a demand for flights to Florida from SWF than B6 could use their ERJ-190s to serve those routes.

[Edited 2005-08-25 05:49:48]


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Reply 23, posted (9 years 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 8907 times:

Quoting Aa757first (Reply 20):
Ok, on a bad day, how long does it take to drive into the city? An hour and a half?

About two hours and a half.

Quoting STT757 (Reply 22):
Flights to JFK on B6 would not work because there's no local traffic, it would be people connecting to flights to FLorida.

The route would also be used by people travelling to Europe, I know a lot of people who go to Europe from Dutchess County and have to drive about two hours to JFK.



No Vueling No Party
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16865 posts, RR: 51
Reply 24, posted (9 years 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 8895 times:

Quoting AlitaliaMD11 (Reply 23):
The route would also be used by people travelling to Europe, I know a lot of people who go to Europe from Dutchess County and have to drive about two hours to JFK.

Your better off driving or taking car service than connecting between two different airlines that do not have interline agreements.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
25 AlitaliaMD11 : True. Sorry that this thread turned into wether or not SWF to JFK would be a good route for B6. I was just simply wondering how the loads on the Amer
26 Post contains images Cha747 : Wasn't CO's short-lived service from HPN to EWR discontinued because at peak times, the plane had to back-track it to Albany or high-tail it to centra
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Santo Domingo First Flights To New York JFK posted Thu May 22 2003 15:03:11 by CaboVerde
Air Bosna To New York Jfk? posted Thu Jun 6 2002 07:57:23 by JU101
Trip Report: Dublin To New York, JFK posted Thu Aug 3 2000 19:32:11 by Aer Lingus
What's Happening To TWA's New York JFK Terminal? posted Fri Nov 16 2001 02:33:48 by Crosswind
Qantas' Sydney - New York JFK Flight...non-stop? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 02:03:03 by 8herveg
Aerolíneas Argentinas Non Stop To New York posted Sat Oct 14 2006 14:13:41 by Cedars747
Luton To New York (EWR) - Here We Come! posted Thu Oct 12 2006 22:52:09 by Gilesdavies
Emirates To Fly Hamburg To New York posted Thu Oct 12 2006 16:48:34 by Semsem
Iranian Leader To New York posted Wed Sep 20 2006 01:34:00 by NYCA330
AV Pereira-Barranquilla-New York JFK MD-83 posted Mon Feb 20 2006 03:30:36 by Derekone
Air Santo Domingo First Flights To New York JFK posted Thu May 22 2003 15:03:11 by CaboVerde
Air Bosna To New York Jfk? posted Thu Jun 6 2002 07:57:23 by JU101
Trip Report: Dublin To New York, JFK posted Thu Aug 3 2000 19:32:11 by Aer Lingus
British Airways To Fly Cardiff - New York JFK? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 01:55:13 by 8herveg
What's Happening To TWA's New York JFK Terminal? posted Fri Nov 16 2001 02:33:48 by Crosswind
TOL Drops Goal Of Flights To New York posted Wed Sep 1 2010 07:41:52 by KarlB737
All Women Crew To Fly AI To New York - Women's Day posted Sun Mar 7 2010 22:22:51 by rajrs
Thai TG Back To New York EWR! posted Wed Dec 2 2009 02:06:00 by NewYorkCityBoi