Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No MFE-EWR Service On CO?  
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Posted (9 years 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5162 times:

As some of you might know, MFE is an airport and actually the main airport of the Rio Grande Valley, to tell you a little more about MFE, MFE has a pretty small terminal with 4 gates(1-4) and two stands(A,B). MFE has 3 air carriers:AA,CO,andG4. They fly to DFW,IAH,MEX, andLAS. But my question is, if CO has pretty good loads on MFE to IAH, why no direct service to the New York area, I'm pretty sure they would do great on that flight and would help the south Texas people go directly to the eastern U.S. instead of flying to IAH or DFW. And thus, continue to Europe etc.

Any CO employees' or reps. that could assist me or all you a.neters be free to opinion your thoughts.


Valley Approach.....
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePzurita1 From Greenland, joined Sep 2002, 1393 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5157 times:

MFE catchment area includes also people from northeastern Mexico (MTY, Saltillo, Reynosa, Matamoros, etc) which use MFE or LRD for its low fares to Europe (through IAH and DFW).but destinations are limited from IAH compared with EWR. May be... just may be it could be a good idea.


Next flight: IAH-DBX-MRU-ANT
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5135 times:

Glad you understand Pzurita, I mean, 1 or 2 flights daily wouldn't hurt. For example I'll put myself for example. My father is Italian, so we go to Italy quite often. THis is the usual route we do: MFE-IAH-EWR-FCO-BRI, and a direct flight from MFE-EWR would be less time consuming saving us 1 flight. thos are my 2 cents.


Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11639 posts, RR: 61
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5126 times:

Quoting MFEFlyer (Thread starter):
But my question is, if CO has pretty good loads on MFE to IAH, why no direct service to the New York area, I'm pretty sure they would do great on that flight

I'm pretty sure they would do horrible and lose their shirts -- there is absolutely no market for MFE-EWR, IMO. The only time I could maybe see it working is a Saturday-only 737 during Spring Break to shuttle people down to South Padre, but even that's a stretch, and that traffic would probably go to HRL, not MFE. I could be wrong, but I doubt there is any real market for a nonstop flight from MFE to the New York area.

Quoting MFEFlyer (Reply 2):
1 or 2 flights daily wouldn't hurt

CO would never, IMO, be able to fill up 1-2 flights per week, let alone 1-2 per day on an MFE-EWR route. There is simply not nearly enough O&D, and why would CO overfly their large, convenient and well-positioned IAH hub just for a (very) few people?


User currently offlineOluseun From Nigeria, joined Aug 2005, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5106 times:

I agree with Commovia. MFE does not have a large enough metro area to handle a direct flight to EWR. There would need to be a substantial amount of connecting and O/D passengers. Without both of those factors - CO would lose money just to compensate a relatively small amount of passengers.

Rgds
Oluseun



AtideOoo!!! Wazobia...
User currently onlineBigGSFO From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2924 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5094 times:

I agree with Commavia and Oluseun; MFE just couldn't support the flights, even with an RJ. In spite of the size of the NYC-metro area and CO's large operation at EWR, I would imagine the majority of destinations people from MFE are going to are already linked to DFW or IAH.

User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5192 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5084 times:

1704 If they did the flight it would have to be COEx with an ERJ145XR, and even still it would probably be weight restricted as the XR has a range of 2,000mi. MFE-EWR is 1704mi. so until an ERJ XXR comes out I wouldn't bet on a MFE-EWR flight--besides I think that CO would start HRL-EWR before MFE if anything.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5067 times:

I do agree, but about HRL-EWR, I doubt it. First of all the McAllen/Mission/edinburg IS A METRO AREA,that has around 900,000 people, The Harlingen/Sanbenito/Browinsville metro has way less. MFE is the one of the fastest growing cities in the Nation, there for, if and only if CO would start service to South Texas, My incentives would go probably to MFE

http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2005/0523/156.html

McAllen is 112 outh of the nation



Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5053 times:

I also forgot to mention the northern states of Mexico Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, they fly out of MFE alot, you have to consider the Mexican Nationals they help McAllen alot with buisness etc. I don't know if you guys remember when G4 announced service to LAS from MFE, those flights are almost all Mexicans I know it's a different subject but, I'm pretty sure CO would consider MFE, maybe not now, but in a few years.

The Rio Grande Valley is a region of more than 2.5 million people when including those living on the Mexican side of the border and can boast 10 million people living within a 150 mile radius of McAllen. Nationwide lists consistently include the McAllen as one of the best cities in the U.S. in which to live and work.

McAllen is the 75th largest metropolitan area in the United States and is 4th fastest growing metropolitan area in the United States, growing by 49% over 1990.


McAllen-Miller International Airport (MFE) is the primary business airport of the Rio Grande Valley of Deep South Texas and Northeast Mexico.

[Edited 2005-08-25 17:44:59]


Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32789 posts, RR: 72
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 5026 times:

A total of 44 people fly non-stop between New York City and McAllen each day. That is definitley not enough to support any kind of non-stop service in a medium-haul market.


a.
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4989 times:

Well if 44 people fly each day, why not open a Continental Express flight 4X a week I mean the ERJ-135 holds about 35 People(?), but I don't know about the range. But who knows maybe this service can open up in a couple of years, decade who knows...


Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32789 posts, RR: 72
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4980 times:

Quoting MFEFlyer (Reply 10):
Well if 44 people fly each day, why not open a Continental Express flight 4X a week I mean the ERJ-135 holds about 35 People(?), but I don't know about the range

It is 44 people in both directions. That doesn't even fill up a Jetstream prop plane. 44 people is not enough, because you can't assume that everybody is going to take the non-stop. Many people won't. In addition, to get any type of good yielding business travelers, you need to offer it daily. 4x weekly doesn't work.

MFE-EWR is at least a decade away.



a.
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4972 times:

I just hope it is a possibility at the least....


Valley Approach.....
User currently onlineBigGSFO From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 2924 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4969 times:

Are there MFE-ATL or MFE-ORD flights currently being offered? I can see these being started well before NYC.

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32789 posts, RR: 72
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4966 times:

Quoting BigGSFO (Reply 13):
Are there MFE-ATL or MFE-ORD flights currently being offered? I can see these being started well before NYC.

No, neither route is operated. I agree that they would come before NYC.



a.
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4962 times:

Hey guys, just wondering, as you know AA mainland service does serve MFE-DFW 4x daily, in your opinion, do you guys see AA opening maybe aonther destination for MFE like JFK,ORD,BOS etc....


Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32789 posts, RR: 72
Reply 16, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4954 times:

Quoting MFEFlyer (Reply 15):
Hey guys, just wondering, as you know AA mainland service does serve MFE-DFW 4x daily, in your opinion, do you guys see AA opening maybe aonther destination for MFE like JFK,ORD,BOS etc....

ORD is definitley a possibility. BOS? JFK? Quite simply, never.



a.
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (9 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4944 times:

So MAH4546 in your opinion, which route do you think would serve MFE first, for example within a decade? ORD with AA or EWR with CO?


Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5192 posts, RR: 8
Reply 18, posted (9 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4937 times:

I'd bet on some type of DL Connection or Air Tran service from ATL before either of those you mention. Even though the metro area of MFE is larger than HRL--I think they'll capitalize on the sun seekers before MFE. Remember SY use to send the occasional DC10 down to HRL.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (9 years 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4922 times:

Drerx7 you might be right, but I sure do miss those daily 757's in MFE. In fact I flew on one in summer of '04 from MFE-EWR just used half of the runway to take off and thats because MFE has a 7,156 FT. runway.

But I sure your right about atleast getting service from ATL on Delta or Airtran, that would be a start for MFE.



Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineMFEFlyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 367 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (9 years 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 4916 times:

MFE needs to be a bit more stronger, I mean they are with AA and CO. I know over the past years they served quite a few airlines. I still remember when Conquest use to serve us, Aero Mexico to MEX I bleive or if not (MTY?), Continental with mainland service to MEX in the mid 90's, then aerolitoral to MTY, then NW to MEM, but in conclusion these airlines weren't strong to MFE. We need strong mainland service like AA and CO so we could have more destinations with less conections because I know MFE has potential.


Valley Approach.....
User currently offlineOluseun From Nigeria, joined Aug 2005, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (9 years 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4820 times:

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 11):
It is 44 people in both directions. That doesn't even fill up a Jetstream prop plane. 44 people is not enough, because you can't assume that everybody is going to take the non-stop. Many people won't. In addition, to get any type of good yielding business travelers, you need to offer it daily. 4x weekly doesn't work.

MFE-EWR is at least a decade away.

MAH4546-

Where are you getting the statistics to support your position? I am not arguing your position as we both see it the same way. I just remember I had a site in my favorites for it, however, to say the least - its gone. Thanks.

Rgds
Oluseun



AtideOoo!!! Wazobia...
User currently offlineKanebear From United States of America, joined May 2002, 953 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (9 years 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 4813 times:

MFE's size is just fine. MFE's demographics aren't. It's just not the right market to support a non-stop to the northeast and doesn't have the necessary economic base yet. El Paso is larger than the Mc Allen MSA and has a stronger economic base. Even ELP doesn't have a direct flight to the NYC area. They do have ORD and many other destinations, but not NYC.

Here is a list of MSAs with economic ranking info.

Here is a sortable list of MSAs with population figures. As you can see, some of the larger MSAs have quite weak economic bases.

[Edited 2005-08-26 07:00:50]

User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 23, posted (9 years 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4797 times:

I don't even think Southwest serves the region nonstop from Dallas?
Just Hobby, Austin, and San Antonio.

It's all about demographics as Kanebear has stated.
A city; a region can have a zillion people, but if they can't afford an airline ticket, airline service will not exist.



Delete this User
User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5192 posts, RR: 8
Reply 24, posted (9 years 4 weeks ago) and read 4766 times:

Southwest only serves Harlingen in the Valley--not MFE tho.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
25 MFEFlyer : We've had Southwest at MFE before in the Mid-90's, but it was a diversion. HEY GUYS, I have a question for you, I remember In the Mid 90's, I'm pretty
26 Klwright69 : This is true of course, however I want to add one thing. CO does well from LAX to non-beach Mexican destinations. I assume people on these flights ar
27 MFEFlyer : I agree klwright69, but why is it the HRL gets Sun Country flights(seasonal) from MSP, is it because of the demand? Usually those flights are all Wint
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No New BF Seats On CO 767-400/-200? posted Tue Dec 30 2003 18:15:59 by Transtar
JETBLUE: Why No Direct TV Service On JFK-San Juan? posted Sat Jun 1 2002 21:31:25 by AsianaAirlines
CO- Why No PNS-EWR? posted Sat Sep 23 2006 20:58:54 by 727LOVER
Food Service EWR-SJU On CO posted Sat Jul 17 2004 19:24:18 by Cory6188
Economy Service On EWR-HKG On CO posted Mon May 3 2004 21:21:27 by GSPSPOT
Why No CLT-MDW Service By US Airways? posted Wed May 17 2006 18:59:41 by United777ORD
Why No SV (PAX) Service To IAH? posted Fri Mar 31 2006 03:19:00 by Thomasphoto60
Why No London-bremen Service? posted Fri Jul 8 2005 13:22:24 by KLM672
Why No AA Eagle In NM/CO? posted Fri Jun 24 2005 15:24:28 by BigGSFO
Why No In-cabin Pets On WN? posted Thu Apr 7 2005 17:03:58 by Junction