MCOtoATL From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 474 posts, RR: 4 Posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2133 times:
I am sure that there is an easy explanation to this. With all of the rumors and talks about possible mergers, no one mentions Southwest at all. Why is that? Personally, I would like to see SW stand alone, for it nicely fills a niche. But every other airline come sup when talking about possible mergers, take-overs, etc...
Matt d From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 43
Reply 1, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2010 times:
I don't think that has even a grain of possibility. Southwest is way too popular and successful. They have such a powerful image that the public outcry alone will almost guarantee that anyone that thought about buying them out would reconsider.
Amir From Syria, joined Dec 1999, 1254 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1943 times:
777X got it to the point, the issue with SW is rather it's unique structure especially the fact that it doesn't operate a hub! out of all US majors (and world majors) there is no one other than SW flying point to point.