Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air France Is The 3rd Customer Of The A3XX!  
User currently offlineAF-A319 From France, joined Oct 1999, 603 posts, RR: 4
Posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3494 times:

Hello!

During a press conference today, Air France's CEO Jean Cyril Spinetta said that he had indicated to the european consortium his interest in acquiring the all new very large aircraft currently under development at Airbus Industrie once it will be on offer.
Air France became the 3rd airline to annouce officialy its interest, after Emirates and Singapore Airlines.

Regards

Louis  
louisdejoux@wanadoo.fr




34 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5293 posts, RR: 61
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

Great news !

Jeremiah Teahan







Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineSRA330-223 From Switzerland, joined Oct 1999, 158 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3238 times:

I was just thinking of which routes Air France will serve with the new Airbus A3XX in future ? Have they got routes where the A3XX is demanded ?

Thanx.


User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3234 times:

Whoow, Air France would be the airline with even the fastest ( Concorde ) and the largest ( A3XX ) planes in the fleet. Advantage France.  

User currently offlineAvion From Bouvet Island, joined May 1999, 2205 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3218 times:

If the A3XX stays on track it be long until other airlines anounce there interest. Some of the possible customer are listed below. Do you agree on potential customers? All these airlines are also 747X targets.

Potential customers:

Europe:
BA
Lufthansa
Iberia
Swissair/Sabena

Asia:
Cathay
Ana
Jal
Air China
Air India

US:
Northwest
The mega carrier United

Australia:
Qantas

Africa:
SAA

Avion



User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3216 times:

Yeah....the Concorde and the A3XX...the two biggest flops in European aviation history....go Air France!

BTW....just about every airline with needs for large widebodies have expressed interest to Airbus for the A3XX...except for the world's largest airline, United, which says they are not needed...only one has seen fit to ORDER...the only one responsible to a few over-extravagant oil shieks rather than stockholders. So, does airbus want 5 or 6 airlines to ORDER to launch the program, or does it want 5 or 6 airlines to be "REALLY, REALLY INTERESTED", as opposed to just "INTERESTED" ....I assume they want firm orders, and are attempting to prime the pump with the type of "peer pressure" tactics they have been using for some time. I am sure Air India is pretty interested in the A3XX as well....does that bump it up to 6 now? Come on! We'll see what happens in July at Farnborough...



Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3188 times:

Cwapilot, the Concorde-design is in service since more than 20 years, not in that big numbers, but not as a flop since the flights are booked. The A3XX will add more numbers to Air France.

User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 7, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3176 times:

"Not in that big numbers" means that the number sold did not justify its development costs. That's what I mean. The aircraft itself may be great, as in the case of the A3XX, but why bankrupt a company (the A3XX costs will not level out at $12 billion, and are considerably more than the Concorde's) for novelty purposes? By the time something on the scale of the A3XX could be a good seller, Boeing and Airbus (if they haven't squandered all of their cash away on the A3XX) and maybe even newer entrants, will be developing aircraft the likes of which we have never seen before. That's where an enhanced and expanded 747 (they are not simply adding more seats to the existing 747 either...it is a much different wing and fuselage design) comes in with an advantage. Boeing received several orders for proposed 747 models, but did the cost-benefit analysis, and held off. A new 747 would fit the needs of airlines for the next 20 or more years, by which time the aircraft being developed will not much resemble those we fly on today. Again, why must everyone think in terms if today's 747? The only thing that would be the same on the 747-400 and the 747X would be the "747" designation and a superficial resemblance on the outside. The technology would not be any older than that on the A3XX. On each design, Boeing allows for growth, development and expansion well into the future. Today's 747 is no more like the 747-400 than the 747X would be like the 747-400. Maybe we could say the A3XX is nothing more than a rehash and modification of Douglas' initial plans for the DC10, which was originally envisaged as a double deck airliner with four engines to trump the 747 (again, ours is bigger than yours)...they, too, saw their folly. Hopefull Airbus does too.


Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offlineSammyk From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1690 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3175 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Oh c'mon, how can you say the Concorde is not a flop? Less that 20 aircraft were built and are in service. These aircraft do mostly charter work now, and scheduled flights are at a minimum. Do you really think the money spent to develop this aircraft was recovered in the very few airframes built? I think not.

Oh, and just because the flights are booked does not mean they are totally profitable, althought they might be for the Concorde. Anyone know what the load factors are for schedules Concorde flights?

Sammy


User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3157 times:

Well, of course the Concorde is not a Best-Seller, but it has it´s very own market. Small but fine. The A3XX will be, ( my opinion ) the right answer to the growing demand of passenger´s in the near future. Boeing won´t let us wait long with it`s own solution.

User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 10, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3146 times:

Cwapilot: If Boeing argued in them same way in the 1960s like you do now, the 747 would never ever have been built.

User currently offlineUAL747-600 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 577 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3132 times:

Air France had no choice on this. From what I've read, the french gov't was not going to let AF order the 16 777-300ER's it wants unless it committed to A3XX. Were any quantities mentioned????

UAL747-600


User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 3117 times:

Air France operates 777´s already for a while, why shouldn´t they be free to order more ? What is your source UAL747-600 ?

User currently offlineRaddog2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3103 times:

Not to contribute to another one of these tiresome A3XX 747X wars, but I thing if you are totally objective you must concede that the Concorde was a flop. All it really accomplished was some national prestige for the UK and France - the airframes actually purchased never came close to covering the development costs. The Concordes are uneconomical and inefficient, and are still operated at a loss despite the $10000 fares. BA and AF only fly them for more prestige purposes.

User currently offlineCwapilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 1166 posts, RR: 17
Reply 14, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3098 times:

Looking at Raddog2's and UAL747-600's comments, I don't need to post what I was going to; I would just be repeating what they said. All I will add is that the A3XX is of the same ilk as the Concorde...just a little prestige for the EU at a HUGE cost to taxpayers in Europe.




Southside Irish...our two teams are the White Sox and whoever plays the Cubs!
User currently offlineUA865 From El Salvador, joined May 2000, 115 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3090 times:


In which routes would AF utilize such a big airplane? I belive Airbus makes great planes but the EU is mounting a lot of pressure on all these state owned airlines to buy AIRBUS.


User currently offlineSF340 From Germany, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3085 times:

The Concorde is a great aircraft in terms of achievement but is in every business sense a flop. As for the A3XX if Airbus can get enough orders then they should go for it. But with only a few airlines expressing only interest and no signifigant orders I don't think it would be wise to invest 15 billion US dollars on a new aircraft program. If they had stockholders I'm sure they would be up in arms over going ahead on an aircraft that only has a few orders so far. I do hope tough that more airlines will look into it and consider it.

User currently offlineSammyk From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1690 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3088 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes, AF operates 777s, but they were not a launch customer, and most of them were due to option conversion and cacellation of 767/737 orders. For AF to be a launch customer of the 777-300ER would be a slap in the face for rival aircraft A340-600. So, for them to get permission (yes they need it, they are still government owned and controlled) to purchase the 773ER, it seems a condition has been put in place, that being to buy the A3XX also.

Sammy


User currently offlineWingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2197 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3075 times:

I wouldn't be surprised by gov't pressure on AF. If the US gov't owned, even partly, an airline in the US you know the pressure to buy Boeing would be equally strong.

It will certainly be an interesting year for launch orders of the A3XX and 747X. When is this FAI show anyway?


User currently offlineTexairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3069 times:

I don't understand these mega aircraft. Is not the trend to go towards smaller planes with more frequencies? Aren't planes crossing the Atlantic getting smaller, 747 to 767 to 757? 737's crossing the Pacific to Hawaii? Why is the 777 so popular? I smell a pissing contest and I don't think its smart to think with your balls (especially when $12 billion is at stake).

Another point, of all the 747-400 flights, what is the % of a complete booking sell out? I am curious to know.

Also, Emirates could fill an A3XX on Haj flights, but that is only for a short time per year, not enough in my mind to justify year round use.


User currently offlineAb.400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 3052 times:

The fares which are up today can not be keeping airlines in business forever. For my ticket from FRA to DTW on USAir I only payed 965,- DM ( about 420,- USD ) and I doubt that the Airline could make much plus with this fare. More frequence with more flight´s is probably not the way to make any profit at all, simply too much cost for AC´s maintenance, fuel, airport fees and crew. Bigger planes once a day for long-routes, linked with shuttle-service ( where you have no extra service ) will be the return to profit. This will be forced by some giants ( alliances ) in the Airline-industrie. Let it be done with either Airbus 3XX or Boeing 747X, but that will happen. My 2 Euros.

User currently offlineTWAneedsHELP From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3048 times:

Yes the prevailing trend is for more frequencies to cities avoiding major hubs. While this argument against the A3XX is an accurate one, there is clearly more to the "story" if you will. The numbers of passengers flying now is significantly higher than it was just 10 years ago. What with increased competition due to deregulation, robust world economies, and increased globilization, passengers numbers will only increase. While airlines continue to order entire air forces of new planes, very few new airports to handle this new increased traffic are being built. Boeings argument is correct, people prefer to fly around mega hubs. However, very soon, this luxury will not be afforded to the travelling public. While airlines continue to increase frequencies delays will occur more oftenly and as is occuring in SFO presently airports and governing autthorities will request that airlines releave congestion by flying fewer flights with larger planes. Hence the A3XX will be necesary. While as some have been quick to point out that the A3XX won't be profitable, that isnt stopping anything. Airbus is destined to go ahead on its project and major airlines are interested, including the competition. Boeing is beginning work on its 747x concept.

What everyone on this forum whether they be Airbus or Boeing backer should remember is that teh airlines won't let either die. Weather the A3XX is a tremendous hit and catapults AI into sound financial footing or is a dud, both Boeing and the European manufacturer will continue to coexist. Its in every airline's best interest.


User currently offlineShankly From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 1540 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2998 times:

Retrospective comments re: the success or failure of certain airliners indicate a considerable level of ignorance.

Concorde was born in an age very different from that in which it eventually flew - cheap fuel and the remnants of days when countries had 'national projects'. Just check out the airline names down the side of Concorde prototypes to get a feel for the omptimism that was around in that era. I am lucky in that I see this bird at least twice a day in or out of LHR. You won't see any one looking up at a 777 or A330. Concorde still makes people stop. Appreciate it whilst it's still around. Just check out this Forum for the admiration now afforded to the CV880/990. OK, so what if they were crap (commercially), they played their part in making air transport what it is today.

The A3XX simply marks the next generation in airliner development, as did the 707, 747, A300 in their days. The fact that it is European is irrelevant. I for one can't wait to fly in one.



L1011 - P F M
User currently offlineTexairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2992 times:

There is an article in Newsweek, June 5, 2000 about A3XX

User currently offlineTifosi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (14 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2977 times:

On a lighter note, It would be interesting to see if Air-France one day flies an A3XX into Princess Julianna in St. Martin like they do with 733s. I wouldn't think it would be a regular flight, but they might do it in times of vacation peaks. I would love to see that.

Cheers! Gregg in MD


25 Post contains links and images AF Cabin Crew : Bonjour ! From what I read in the articles in the french press, our CEO, Mr J-C Spinetta has expressed AF's interest in the Mega-carrier for 10 units
26 Rm-11 : Air France will use the 3XX to US, cool. It would be amazing to see this monster at ATL.
27 Post contains images CX747 : Sorry to burst your bubble AF Cabin Crew, but Air France is not free to choose whatever aircraft it deems better suited for its routes. In this partic
28 AFa340-300E : Hello, Just one thing AF Cabin Crew, Air France was not the launch customer of the GE90-powered Boeing 777-200ER (formerly known as the IGW). It was B
29 CX747 : I don't understand how we went from Air France is INTERESTED in the A3XX to Air France has ordered the A3XX and this is what routes it will be flown o
30 FlyBoeing : Will the A3XX have similar wake turbulence characteristics to a 747? I read somewhere that since it's so large it might actually reduce the frequencie
31 BOS-CDG : Can you explain the "is not free to " where did you read that, where did you find any valid article stating that in order to buy B777 AF had to commit
32 CX747 : My information comes directly from the orders web mail ring. The members in this ring are directly involved in the industry I guess you could say are
33 AFa340-300E : Hello CX747, Air France had to make up its mind within the week, and say whether they would order the A3XX or not. Their reply was that they'll actual
34 Post contains images Delta772 : I get such a kick reading the responses on this forum. This is in regards to the Concorde and its lessons for the marketplace today. In the 60's, the
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air France On The CDG/TLV Route posted Sat Nov 26 2005 18:45:39 by LY777
Air France And The A380 posted Tue Oct 11 2005 18:04:27 by Okees
Air France Put The A380 In ATL posted Fri Jan 21 2005 06:10:40 by Padcrasher
Air France And The Situation In Ivory Coast posted Sun Nov 7 2004 11:00:51 by AirGabon
Why Air Travel Is The Best Form Of Transportation posted Thu Oct 14 2004 23:56:51 by Tony Lu
Will Air France Order The Airbus A380 Freighter? posted Wed May 19 2004 00:35:09 by American 767
Air France On The Verge Of A Tragedy... posted Tue Dec 17 2002 14:32:28 by CaboVerde
Will Air France Consider The B 747-400ER? posted Sat Oct 27 2001 03:12:17 by United Airline
Air France And The A380 posted Tue Jun 19 2001 15:35:08 by AF007
Will Air France Consider The B 747-400LR? posted Mon Jun 4 2001 20:02:07 by United Airline