Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Super-sonic Airliners  
User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 10
Posted (15 years 12 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

I suspect the reason we do not see mainstream super-sonic airliners is we simply don't have the technology to make them cost-effective. The Concorde is still a novelty after all these years, probably because its expensive to fly. But my question to all if you is, could we someday, in the near future, see economically feasible super-sonic RJs? After you stop laughing, please give it a hard second thought. I bet it'll happen long before financially practical full-size SSTs. If you think it could happen; how many years away is it? Any thoughts?

"Shaddap you!"
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCPDC10-30 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4992 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (15 years 12 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1453 times:

There are not just economic reasons for supersonic passenger aircraft not gaining popularity. They also produce a lot or air pollution and even more noise pollution - at least with the Concorde does with its engines. I don't think you'll even see a supersonic RJ as you suggest because every urban area in the world does not allow supersonic overflight because of obvious noise considerations.

User currently offlineFanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 2151 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (15 years 12 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1440 times:

I read back in the late 1970s of a proposed joint French-Soviet supersonic business jet; I believe the two companies were Dassault and Sukhoi. Evidently the idea never became reality, probably for the economic and environmental reasons cited.

The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
User currently offlineSF340 From Germany, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 12 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1438 times:

In the last 10 years Gulfstream and nearly every other business jet manufacturer looked into Supersonic buiness jets and determined that there isn't an engine that is workable in this area yet.

As for RJs they would probably be the last ones to go supersonic. They always fly overland, supersonic booms create a lot of noise below so those living underneath wouldn't allow that. Plus they fly short range trips where speed doesn't matter all that much

User currently offlineWingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2884 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (15 years 12 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1433 times:

Business jets will definitely come first. I agree that engine technology is the key. My opinion is that the engines being built for the F-22 incorporate the first radical breakthrough required for economical SST travel for business or commercial. This is the "supercruise" feature which will allow the F-22 to maintain SS speeds without afterburners. The result is a significant drop in fuel consumption. We'll see if it actually works, but it's certainly a step in the right direction. The only problem is surrendering the technology early on for commercial use.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Super-sonic Passenger Jets Are So Unpopular posted Tue Dec 21 2004 22:41:05 by Thrust
Super Sonic 747? posted Thu May 23 2002 04:52:39 by Flyingbronco05
(super)Sonic Cruiser posted Mon Sep 10 2001 23:10:11 by Charlieduke
Boeing' Super Sonic Transport Plane posted Fri Apr 21 2000 03:31:47 by Flying_727
Which Airliners Can Dump Fuel? posted Sun Jan 7 2007 04:24:53 by T773ER
Affect Of Fog On Airliners posted Fri Dec 22 2006 18:12:10 by Aviator737
Why Doesn't Lockheed Build Airliners Again? posted Thu Dec 21 2006 14:23:15 by CX747
Bushfires & Effect Of Airliners. posted Mon Dec 11 2006 02:23:01 by Bakestar
O'Hare To Tow Airliners To Runways? posted Wed Dec 6 2006 19:58:26 by KarlB737
Does P&W Have A Chance For Future Airliners? posted Thu Nov 23 2006 02:14:12 by 1337Delta764