Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MAS Seek's Compensation For A380 Delay  
User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4188 posts, RR: 89
Posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3255 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Sept. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Malaysian Airline System Bhd., the
nation's biggest carrier, said it's seeking compensation from
Airbus SAS because of a delay in the delivery of six A380
aircraft from the manufacturer.

``We are naturally disappointed with this delay,'' Malaysian
Airline's executive director Azmil Zahruddin said in a Sept. 11
statement. ``We are considering our options on this matter,''
Malaysian Airline joins Emirates, the largest customer for
the A380, Qantas Airways Ltd. and Singapore Airlines Ltd. in
seeking damages after the world's biggest maker of commercial
aircraft said in June the first deliveries of the new 555-seat
aircraft will be delayed as much as half a year.


This is the fourth carrier to seek compensation, does this mean that other Launch carriers have the right to claim as well?

Regards, PanAm_DC10


Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineManni From South Korea, joined Nov 2001, 4221 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3211 times:

"We are considering our options on this matter"

Perhaps an indication that negotiations for an A350 order are pending? Or a follow up order to the initial 6 ordered.



SUPPORT THE LEBANESE CIVILIANS
User currently offlineShenzhen From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 1710 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3201 times:

Quoting Manni (Reply 1):
Perhaps an indication that negotiations for an A350 order are pending? Or a follow up order to the initial 6 ordered.

or cancellation, considering they are bleeding red?


User currently offlineWINGS From Portugal, joined May 2005, 2831 posts, RR: 68
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3191 times:

Quoting Shenzhen (Reply 2):

or cancellation, considering they are bleeding red?

Ok, and how did you come to this conclusion? When in the report mentions the following. Try not to get carried away.

Quoting PanAm_DC10 (Thread starter):
``We are naturally disappointed with this delay,'' Malaysian
Airline's executive director Azmil Zahruddin said in a Sept. 11
statement.

Regards,
Wings



Aviation Is A Passion.
User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12220 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3183 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting Manni (Reply 1):
Perhaps an indication that negotiations for an A350 order are pending? Or a follow up order to the initial 6 ordered.

That does not always mean an A350 or extra A380 orders, but obviously Airbus will do what ever it takes to make MAS happy and obviously keep Airbuses cash flow and/or order book happy


User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3172 times:

Quoting Shenzhen (Reply 2):
or cancellation, considering they are bleeding red?

Why would they cancel when they can get the A380 cheaper as expected thanks to a possible compensation?


Regards
Udo


User currently offlineShenzhen From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 1710 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3165 times:

Quoting WINGS (Reply 3):

Ok, and how did you come to this conclusion?

About the same way that a follow on order would come out of the "considering our options" statement.

Simply adding a minus to the plus to equal both out.

Cheers


User currently offlineKEno From Malaysia, joined Feb 2004, 1842 posts, RR: 27
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3165 times:

Quoting Shenzhen (Reply 2):
or cancellation, considering they are bleeding red?


Malaysia is famous for wanting everything big - world's tallest building, world's tallest airport control tower, the region's biggest airport.... I don't see why they should stop there and not go through with world's biggest passenger airliner. It goes too well with everything big we have here  

[Edited 2005-09-12 11:32:51]

User currently offlineShenzhen From United States of America, joined Jun 2003, 1710 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3139 times:

Quoting Udo (Reply 5):
Why would they cancel when they can get the A380 cheaper

I wasn't being serious... but if ordering more A380s is an option, then cancelling certainly could be an option also.

Most contracts in the world allow you an out after one side doesn't deliver after X amount of time. A380 contract with MAS.. haven't a clue.

Cheers


User currently offlineBreiz From France, joined Mar 2005, 1917 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 3062 times:

Quoting PanAm_DC10 (Thread starter):
Sept. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Malaysian Airline System Bhd., the
nation's biggest carrier, said it's seeking compensation from
Airbus SAS because of a delay in the delivery of six A380
aircraft from the manufacturer.

``We are naturally disappointed with this delay,'' Malaysian
Airline's executive director Azmil Zahruddin said in a Sept. 11
statement. ``We are considering our options on this matter,''

However, a senior Minister is reported to have said today that: "Malaysia Airlines is unlikely to suffer any fallout from the six-month delay in Airbus delivering its new super-jumbo A380 aircraft"


User currently offlineAviasian From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 1489 posts, RR: 14
Reply 10, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2926 times:

Quoting PanAm_DC10 (Thread starter):
Ok, and how did you come to this conclusion? When in the report mentions the following. Try not to get carried away.

MAS recently announced a hefty quarterly loss of more than US$70 million - along with the "retirement' of the airline's Managing Director . . . a new MD has since been found - a Malaysian who had previously worked for Shell. Along with this announcement came the revelation that previous quarters' profits were derived from one-off items.

Maybe that's how Shenzhen came to that conclusion.

There were even reports that the MAS' plans to replace its B737-400 fleet could be in jeopardy. You will also be hearing of "an accord" between AirAsia and MAS that will affect the domestic operation of MAS.

MAS is certainly not in a position to purchase A350s for a while yet.

KC Sim


User currently offlineXA744 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 734 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2904 times:

Quoting KEno (Reply 7):
Malaysia is famous for wanting everything big - world's tallest building, world's tallest airport control tower, the region's biggest airport.... I don't see why they should stop there and not go through with world's biggest passenger airliner. It goes too well with everything big we have here

... And especially when pride has something to do with it, when you look south from Johor Bahru !

Regards



No matter how you fly...just never get your wings clipped !
User currently offlinePanAm_DC10 From Australia, joined Aug 2000, 4188 posts, RR: 89
Reply 12, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2727 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
COMMUNITY MANAGER

Quoting Breiz (Reply 9):
However, a senior Minister is reported to have said today that: "Malaysia Airlines is unlikely to suffer any fallout from the six-month delay in Airbus delivering its new super-jumbo A380 aircraft"

That is correct. The news report has since been updated and the following added which was not available to post yesterday.

Malaysian Airline will consider ``reappraising'' the
deployment of planes for existing and future routes as well as
its weekly frequencies to minimize the impact of the delayed A380
delivery, the carrier said.


So they'll most definately be taking delivery of them.

Quoting Aviasian (Reply 10):
Quoting PanAm_DC10 (Thread starter):
Ok, and how did you come to this conclusion? When in the report mentions the following. Try not to get carried away.

Aviasion Respectfully, to clarify, you have attributed a quote to me that I did not make. The text you quote is reply #3 So I cannot answer as I did not draw that conclusion  Wink

What I find most interesting is that no-one has answered my original question though of note, all 4 carriers mentioned have outstanding RFP's which will make for quite interesting orders into year end.

Regards, PanAm_DC10



Ask the impossible to achieve the best possible
User currently offlineRevelation From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 12742 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

Quoting Udo (Reply 5):
Quoting Shenzhen (Reply 2):
or cancellation, considering they are bleeding red?

Why would they cancel when they can get the A380 cheaper as expected thanks to a possible compensation?

MAS will be missing the six months profit from operating the A380, so it won't be any cheaper, or are you trying to say that the A380 does not operate at a profit?

Just wondering...  Smile



Inspiration, move me brightly!
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9644 posts, RR: 68
Reply 14, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2668 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

what he is saying is (lets say for the discussion) Airbus will 'give' MAS $50million in penalties for being late with the A380, thus making the A380 purchase $50million cheaper.

The problem with this statement is that it is not true, the $50million (or whatever the number is) is to make up for lost revenue, not to make the planes cheaper.


User currently offlineEmmenezMoi From France, joined Apr 2005, 70 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2553 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 14):
what he is saying is (lets say for the discussion) Airbus will 'give' MAS $50million in penalties for being late with the A380, thus making the A380 purchase $50million cheaper.

The problem with this statement is that it is not true, the $50million (or whatever the number is) is to make up for lost revenue, not to make the planes cheaper.

It's still cheaper than canceling the orders and order other planes instead that will come even later with even more lost revenue... In economic terms, the 6-months delay is a so called "sunk cost" (i.e. there is nothing you can do about it - can't really make it up by ordering other planes). So if MAS does get some penalties, yes it will in fact make it cheaper than today's situation, which is what Udo said. Take you're point though that it isn't cheaper than the original pre-delay situation (but that's NOT what Udo was talking about).


Rgds.



PNC aux portes!
User currently offlineUdo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 2512 times:

Quoting EmmenezMoi (Reply 15):

Thanks EmmenezMoi, that sums it up quite well. My guess is MAS will still be better off financially in the end, despite a loss of revenue.


Regards
Udo


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Pays Kingfisher $22 Millions For A380 Delay posted Fri Oct 6 2006 11:08:54 by Thorben
MAS Selects RR For A380 posted Thu Dec 16 2004 22:37:27 by Mas777
The A380 Delay, - Last Chance For 748i? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 21:06:54 by 797charter
Real Reason For The Third A380 Delay? posted Sat Jun 17 2006 08:32:07 by Zvezda
SQ Reacts After A380 Delay. Punch For Airbus! posted Fri Jun 16 2006 14:38:26 by Lufthansi
Airbus Agrees To Compensation For Delay posted Fri Nov 11 2005 14:45:12 by 777DadandJr
Sorry For The Delay.. It's A Heap Of Rubbish posted Fri Nov 17 2006 21:05:03 by Clickhappy
Korean Air Announces 2 Year A380 Delay To 2010 posted Wed Nov 15 2006 07:01:32 by Singapore_Air
UK - New "super" Wake Vortex Sep For A380 posted Mon Nov 6 2006 16:23:41 by Mptpa
Easa Eyes 15 December For A380 Type Approval posted Fri Oct 27 2006 11:40:13 by Leelaw