Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
9/11 Flights That Did Not Take Off  
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9625 posts, RR: 68
Posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 9936 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Does anyone have a list of other flights that may have been hijacked on 9/11, but were grounded by the FAA?

Here is a list, if anyone has any more info on these, or others, please post

American Airlines Flight 43
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1550993.stm

Knives and box cutters were found on two separate canceled Delta Airlines
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,175953,00.html

Two knives were found on an Air Canada flight
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/10/15/inv.air.canada/index.html

American Airlines Flight 160
A box cutter knife was found under a seat cushion on American Airlines Flight 160, a 767 that would have flown from San Diego to New York on the morning of 9/11 but for the air ban. [Chicago Tribune, 9/23/01]

CO flights?
Knives of the same type used in the successful hijackings were found taped to the backs of fold-down trays on a Continental Airlines flight from Newark. [Guardian, 9/19/01]

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 9896 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Thread starter):
Does anyone have a list of other flights that may have been hijacked on 9/11, but were grounded by the FAA?

Only one I was aware of was this one, not by FAA, but by the dispatcher and captain of UA23...

Link in this message/thread...

http://www.airliners.net/discussions...ral_aviation/read.main/2321794/#29


User currently offlineGOAQ From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 32 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 9528 times:

Where was AA Flt. 43 from Boston going to that morning. I don't remember a flight 43 out of Boston. Unless it was a transatlantic flight. Paris? London?

If I remember back than, all transcon flights on AA, DL, UA were widebodies, 767s. I was working AA flt.195 the morning of 9/11. Which was pushed back a little before 9a.m. and after flt.11 hit the WTC. Our 767-300 3-class that morning to SFO, which was an equipment substitution was a light load.

Only the man above will know if that flight had any hijackers or any of the other transcon flights for that matter. Thank goodness the FAA grounded all flights soon after that morning. If not I may not be here typing this response.


User currently offlineBoeing Nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 9208 times:

I personally dispute the suspision for AA Flt 160 as Al Queda's plan was to crash aircraft with full or close to full fuel. But that's just me.

User currently offlineC680 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 588 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 8733 times:

Quoting Boeing Nut (Reply 3):
I personally dispute the suspision for AA Flt 160 as Al Queda's plan was to crash aircraft with full or close to full fuel. But that's just me.

Who ever said they would crash it in NYC? - plenty of good targets in California too!



My happy place is FL470 - what's yours?
User currently offlineWdleiser From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 961 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 6833 times:

Quoting C680 (Reply 4):

But it has been stated that their plan was to fly planes FULL of fuel to cause the most damage. That is why they got the widebody longhauls that were early flights which had less people but plenty of fuel.


User currently offlineC680 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 588 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6749 times:

Quoting Wdleiser (Reply 5):

According to the first Message, AA160 was a B767 From San Diego to New York.



My happy place is FL470 - what's yours?
User currently offlineFlyingTexan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6721 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Thread starter):
CO flights?

IIRC, a Continental mainline flight EWR-SAT diverted to STL. Several got off, boarded Amtrak to San Antonio and were later arrested with some obscene amount of cash and box cutters.

Please correct and/or add any info if anyone knows.


User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6709 times:

Quoting FlyingTexan (Reply 7):

IIRC, a Continental mainline flight EWR-SAT diverted to STL. Several got off, boarded Amtrak to San Antonio and were later arrested with some obscene amount of cash and box cutters.

I seem to recall a flight (into STL?) and some guys ending up in Ft. Worth via train. Same incident? Some details are fuzzy after four years....


User currently offlineRobertS975 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 940 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6667 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I have never heard any factual followup to those initial stories that other aircraft were likely to have been hijacked that day. It would have been a simple matter to identify those passengers on flights that were cancelled that never asked for their money back and never asked to be rebooked on another flight after the planes started flying again.

User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9625 posts, RR: 68
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 6645 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

How would it have been "a simple matter" if they were using fake ID and assumed identities?

User currently offlinePlanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3527 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 6595 times:

yeah, like OPNLguy said, i've only heard of UAL23, which grounded itself in Newark (i think), and had a gaggle of guys run off the flight when it got back to the gate...


Do you like movies about gladiators?
User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6388 times:

Wasn't there supposed to be a 2nd wave of attacks on the west coast, and midwest?

By the way, before 11 Sep, it was legal to carry a 3-inch blade (or less) pocket knife on board. Not anymore ...



"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineNWrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 84 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 6332 times:

Quoting GOAQ (Reply 2):
If I remember back than, all transcon flights on AA, DL, UA were widebodies, 767s.

Most were, but not all. AA77 was a 757.



Welcome to the back of the boat...the non-rev section
User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 6148 times:

Quoting GOAQ (Reply 2):
Where was AA Flt. 43 from Boston going to that morning. I don't remember a flight 43 out of Boston. Unless it was a transatlantic flight. Paris? London?

I believe it was AA154, the morning LHR flight. Rumours have circulated that the plane had cancelled that morning and there was a large group of Arab men that were very angry that the flight was cancelled. Of course, none of this is substantiated and I suppose we'll never know but that has been on the table for some time. At the time, AA154/155 was still operated by a B767-323ER.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineBrettbrett21 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 436 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 6082 times:

Quoting Bluewave 707 (Reply 12):

By the way, before 11 Sep, it was legal to carry a 3-inch blade (or less) pocket knife on board. Not anymore ...

That is unbelievable. How can people be so stupid!?! Really, that is possibly the dumbest thing I've heard in a while. Was this just confined to the US or were there similar rules in Europe and the rest of the world?

Brett



i'm so excited i wish i could wet my pants!
User currently offlineGOAQ From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 32 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5942 times:

To NWrr:

I should have been more clear, I meant all transcons out of Boston. Sorry for the mix up.

LH423:

Thanks for clarifying. I didn't think there was an AA flt.43 out of Boston. I do remember the LHR flight that morning though. Again thanks for verifying.

GOAQ


User currently offlineSpacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3624 posts, RR: 12
Reply 17, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 5759 times:

Wasn't there supposed to be a 2nd wave of attacks on the west coast, and midwest?


No, that was one of the many myths that still surround 9/11. There is no evidence of a second wave of attacks. It wouldn't even make sense to think there could be; the terrorists themselves planned all of the attacks to be simultaneous because they knew once they started, all flights would be grounded and a flight 93-type scenario could happen to any planes still in the air (the tapes of flight 93 demonstrate pretty clearly that the terrorists had planned for the possibility that they might have to abandon their targets).

In fact there's no real evidence to support the idea that any of the other flights mentioned so far were supposed to be used by terrorists. As others have pointed out, it was legal to carry knives and box cutters on airplanes at the time and it's no big stretch to think that a few passengers on a few of the thousands of planes around the country would have left one or two on board at some point. I remember reading at the time that these box cutters were "hidden" on these planes, but the way it was described seemed to me more likely that they just fell out of carry-on bags either in the overhead bins or under the seat and got lodged in places that were likely to be missed by the cleaning crew. Those blades could have been on those planes for months, if not years.

In the video tapes that leaked out of meetings bin Laden had with his underlings after the attacks, no mention is made of any other flights either. There is no statement to the effect of "man, that was great, but if only those five other flights had gotten off the ground..." There is only celebration on those tapes, in fact bin Laden himself says on one of them that the attack caused greater destruction than anyone hoped.

There's not much doubt in my mind that there were only supposed to be four flights. There were probably supposed to be 20 hijackers instead of 19, but they still managed to get all four flights up and three of them unfortunately managed to hit their targets. That's bad enough, why do some people almost seem to have a need to believe it was supposed to be even worse?



I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
User currently offlineDaron4000 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 712 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5622 times:

Quoting Brettbrett21 (Reply 15):
That is unbelievable. How can people be so stupid!?! Really, that is possibly the dumbest thing I've heard in a while. Was this just confined to the US or were there similar rules in Europe and the rest of the world?

Actually, when I was on a BA flight intra-Europe 757 in the very late 90's, the captain let my go into the cockpit....DURING THE FLIGHT! Yes, I'm being serious, that is how lax the laws were. It seemed so cool to me, and now, it only seems stupid, especially when the airlines were preaching safety, safety, safety.


User currently offlineAA54Heavy From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 189 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 5580 times:

Quoting Daron4000 (Reply 18):
Actually, when I was on a BA flight intra-Europe 757 in the very late 90's, the captain let my go into the cockpit....DURING THE FLIGHT! Yes, I'm being serious, that is how lax the laws were. It seemed so cool to me, and now, it only seems stupid, especially when the airlines were preaching safety, safety, safety.

Same thing happened to me, in Summer 2001, I flew PHX-LGW...I asked the flight attendant if I could visit the cockpit upon arrival in LGW, and she said sure thing. Just prior to our descent into London the flight attendant came back to my seat and asked me to follow her. She took me to the cockpit, and I sat in the jump seat and chatted with the reserve captain while the pilot/FO were making their preparations for arrival. I took pictures and everything and chilled there for like 10 minutes or so...very cool, but very much in perspective now.



Roger that, turning to our "other" left
User currently offlineCHI787ORD From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 517 posts, RR: 4
Reply 20, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5436 times:

Quoting Bluewave 707 (Reply 12):
Wasn't there supposed to be a 2nd wave of attacks on the west coast, and midwest?

I remember hearing in 2001 that the Air Canada flight from YYZ-NYC was planned to hit the Sears Tower in Chicago. However the flight was canceled and the supposed terrorists fled the country somehow.

I've also heard that Flight 93 was originally suppose to hit the Sears Tower as well, but there was a flight plan mixup by the terrorists.


User currently offlineF9fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 696 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 5356 times:

There were rumors that there were plans to hijack as many as ten planes and crash them into targets in Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle as well as New York and Washington, DC, with an eleventh plane to be hijacked and after it landed safely, the hijackers would release a statement and let everyone go. However, Al Quida realized that this plan was way to grandiose and logistically difficult to complete, so they went with the scaled back version of hijacking four planes and crashing them into the World Trade Center, the White House, and the capitol building (the Pentagon was an alternate target because the White House is very difficult to spot from the air because of the foliage nearby.)

There was a report that a plane bound for SAT that was diverted to STL where everyone then boarded an Amtrak train for the completion of the trip had a couple people arrested in what was thought to be another possible hijack team. However, these people were later cleared and released. There was also a DL flight from BOS to SFO (I think) that was confused with UA 93 and was assumed hijacked, but it landed safely in CLE. It was later determined this was just a case of mistaken identity.


User currently offlineHawk44 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 759 posts, RR: 3
Reply 22, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 5271 times:

Quoting Spacecadet (Reply 17):
There were probably supposed to be 20 hijackers instead of 19

This is correct the 20th hijacker in reality was a man named Ramzi bin al-Shibh who was not able to get a visa into the United States.

I wonder what flight Zacarias Moussaoui was supposed to be on, was he supposed to fly on 9/11 or was he supposed to be part of an attack later on?

Quoting F9fan (Reply 21):
There was also a DL flight from BOS to SFO (I think) that was confused with UA 93 and was assumed hijacked

Not 100% sure of the destination or the origin but I do remember that fighters were going to be scrambled for a DL flight which was being mistaken for flight 93

Hawk44



Never under estimate the power of US
User currently offlineAdam T. From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 957 posts, RR: 6
Reply 23, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 5217 times:

I seem to recall reading somewhere that there planned attacks on London on Sept. 11 as well.

User currently offlineBA757 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2832 posts, RR: 14
Reply 24, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5195 times:

Quoting Adam T. (Reply 23):
I seem to recall reading somewhere that there planned attacks on London on Sept. 11 as well.

Indeed, I remember that too.

Two BA flights from LHR to MAN wasn't it? 757? Common cockpit with the aircraft used in the American attacks.

Adam


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What If TWA Did Not Take Over Ozark? posted Mon May 15 2006 15:48:17 by 7E72004
If The Ansett Groundings Did Not Take Place....... posted Sat Sep 4 2004 11:53:19 by United Airline
Routes That Did Not Exist 20 Years Ago... posted Mon Jul 12 2004 06:10:09 by Lehpron
If The Ansett April Grounding Did Not Take Place.. posted Mon Sep 2 2002 13:11:45 by United Airline
Did Allegiant Abort A Take Off At MKE On 3/11 posted Sun Mar 12 2006 17:47:24 by Legacytravel
MD-11 Open Hatch At Take Off Question posted Mon Oct 24 2005 22:06:25 by Tripple7
Did A 707 Just Take Off In Prague? posted Fri Apr 30 2004 12:30:47 by Duke
Wind conditions that jet airliners can take off in? posted Thu Nov 13 2003 05:04:50 by Dandy_don
Why Did AC Cancel Flights To NRT, Not HKG Or P posted Wed Apr 30 2003 19:58:01 by Samurai 777
Did Air Switzerland Ever Take Off? posted Mon Apr 28 2003 22:13:07 by United Airline
Routes That Did Not Exist 20 Years Ago... posted Mon Jul 12 2004 06:10:09 by Lehpron
If The Ansett April Grounding Did Not Take Place.. posted Mon Sep 2 2002 13:11:45 by United Airline
Did Allegiant Abort A Take Off At MKE On 3/11 posted Sun Mar 12 2006 17:47:24 by Legacytravel
Airlines That Play Music On Take Off And Landing posted Tue Mar 3 2009 03:22:35 by Raffik
Why The MD 11's Did Not Last Long In Service? posted Thu Mar 27 2008 17:55:41 by KU747
Stavanger Flights Take Off From Aberdeen posted Wed Aug 15 2007 14:59:24 by Revo