Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Solution To The Growing Airline Industry  
User currently offlineBoeing747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 3 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1967 times:

Since airline travel is growing and growing, the airports are getting way overcrowded. The solution is to stop airline travel for about 1-2 months. During this time period, airports could be enlarged and redesigned. All major airports would be worked on at the same time. I think that airports should be way more organized. This will cause major chaos among the public. But we all know that something has to be done soon because of the growing delays and industry. If we were to sacrafice 2 months of airline travel, we would not have to deal with delays or anything. If the airports were enlarged and more organized, travel expenses would probably go down and air travel would be a lot easier.


What's your opinion on this solution?

B744

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVelocityair From United States of America, joined May 2000, 134 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 3 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1811 times:

dumbass wake up that will never work

User currently offline777x From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 3 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1809 times:

ummm, let me think...

Nope, it would never work (just ask the NIMBY's)



User currently offlineShankly From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 1541 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 months 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1803 times:

1 to 2 months would just about give you enough time to fit out a new Starbucks and put all the luggage trolleys back where they belong.


L1011 - P F M
User currently offlineLBSteve From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

That would seriously damage the economy, what would you have those people do while not working earning a living? Many people are just a paycheck or two from financial ruin. Better to re-regulate the airline industry with less point to point routes. I think some re-regulation of the Airline industry would be a more effective and less drastic solution.

American Airlines operates a multitude of daily LAX-DFW flights on their MD-80 & 757s, just like United etc does on other routes. A more efficient use of airspace would be to consolidate all those flights onto a 747 or A3XX type. I realize regulation is unpopular, particularly with business, but given the shortage of air traffic controllers, increasingly crowded skies, disgruntled passenger, we should at least look into the idea. Also, what developing our vastly underused rail system such as the Europeans?


User currently offlineBoeing747-400 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1788 times:

But something has to be done soon, right? What do yall think could be done?

User currently offlineJetService From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4798 posts, RR: 11
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1774 times:

Not only is there overcrowed airports, but way too many underserved as well. Most of them are medium-sized markets. Well, here's a redical idea I've had for a long time. The gov't could help solve this problem without dictating to the majors how to run their business. How? By subsidizing newly formed regional airlines that are based at each under-served market. Each new airline serves only one market. They offer point-to-points to all popular destinations from that market that the majors refuse to fly non-stop. This would rob pax from the majors, you say? That's what they get for neglecting these types of markets.
At the very least the gov't could offer incentives or even subsidies to the majors for flying these types of routes. Let's face it, the Hub-&-Spoke model and deregulation created this animal and the disproportional parity of service between overcrowed and underserved markets. RJs could easily fix it, but unions and airline management are all too stubborn to come up with a solution. While I'm here, I'll tell you my solution to scope. Unlimited RJs to any market that has not seen mainline service in the last 7 years. Competetive feed, no lost mainline jobs. PROBLEM SOLVED! DUH!!!!!!



"Shaddap you!"
User currently offlineTritanic From United States of America, joined Jul 2010, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 months 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1770 times:

LB Steve. Your idea about consolidation of aircrafts such as the A3XX looks good on paper, but realistically the public wants more flexabilily in schedules not bigger planes. The public wants to leave there meeting drive straight to the public and board an aircraft. They want options, and flexability.......

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The United States Airline Industry posted Tue Nov 16 2004 22:24:14 by Planespotting
Video About The US Airline Industry posted Fri Sep 15 2006 20:00:49 by Flyf15
Have RJ's Ruined The Airline Industry? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 08:41:30 by Apodino
Rod Eddington On The Airline Industry And China posted Sun Jun 11 2006 20:19:35 by Concorde001
Who Works In The Airline Industry? posted Mon May 8 2006 19:25:55 by BAKrew
Who Here Works For The U.S. Airline Industry? posted Sun Apr 23 2006 20:47:51 by Jad0761
How Can I Get Into The Airline Industry? posted Sat Apr 1 2006 22:27:19 by B787
The Oscars Of The Airline Industry Award posted Tue Feb 28 2006 02:52:11 by TinkerBelle
Meeting New People In The Airline Industry posted Wed Feb 15 2006 16:34:31 by KLM672
2005 A Bad Year For The American Airline Industry? posted Tue Jan 31 2006 23:11:22 by JetBlueGuy2006