Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Continental Guam Refuses Usps Parcels Over 16 Oz.  
User currently offlineGuamVICE From Guam, joined Jun 2005, 151 posts, RR: 18
Posted (9 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3357 times:

Continental recently informed the United States Postal Service in Guam that it will no longer accept parcels over 16 ounces. No official reason given. The decision comes at the instruction of the Transportation Security Agency. CO's daily flight to HNL is responsible for a significant majority of the USPS's deliveries to the Mainland. With this new restriction, over 200,000 residents in the area are affected. I apologize if there's a thread already regarding this, but I was wondering if there are similar cases to this...Read on....

http://www.guampdn.com/apps/pbcs.dll...ID=/20050915/NEWS01/509150304/1002


The two most engaging powers of a photographer are to make new things familiar and to make familiar things new. ~Thacker
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCV580Freak From Bahrain, joined Jul 2005, 1033 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3331 times:

I wonder what the TSA's definition is of what is a "letter" and when that letter becomes a "parcel" which may then require x-ray search, maybe it's 16 ozs.

Even so I would have thought that the USPS had their own security equipment, not heard that FX have similar problems.



One day you are the pigeon, the next the statue ...
User currently offlineHNL From United States of America, joined exactly 10 years ago today! , 336 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3310 times:

Wow - seems like a loss of an easy revenue stream. Those packages are going to go by air *someway*. Living on an island and having to send things by surface is less than desirable.


HNL - There's no place like it!
User currently offlineDiesel33 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 302 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

So is it CO that is actually refusing to carry the parcels???

diesel33


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25385 posts, RR: 49
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3287 times:

Quoting CV580Freak (Reply 1):
not heard that FX have similar problems.

The security regulation at the moment is for passenger airlines. All cargo aircraft do not need the additional screening.

USPS has as a result already been making use of pure cargo airlines capacity to ship mail parcels, which likely will now need to be expanded further.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineGuamVICE From Guam, joined Jun 2005, 151 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3253 times:

Quoting Diesel33 (Reply 3):
So is it CO that is actually refusing to carry the parcels???

No, the federal TSA is stopping them from accepting them...

[Edited 2005-09-15 03:21:28]


The two most engaging powers of a photographer are to make new things familiar and to make familiar things new. ~Thacker
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13115 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3176 times:

For a number of years, the USPS has required all parcels over 16 ounces/1 Pound, to be brought in person to a USPS office and handed over the counter. This was done mainly to discourage mail bombs, especially after the 'unibomber'. As to Guam and the CO-Micro situation, probably in part for safety, but maybe to discourage heavy packages and hense extra weight on those long inter-island hops, to increase fuel mileage too.

User currently offlineSocal From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 473 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3137 times:

If it means safe flights, then am all for it....  bigthumbsup 


I Love HNL.............
User currently offlineWjcandee From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5163 posts, RR: 22
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3138 times:

This looks like just a little logistics problem for the USPS. It's not that complicated a deal for them simply to charter some lift to pick up the backlogged packages, but frankly this isn't enough to charter a plane to come and get. "Seven tons of packages" sounds like a lot -- 14,000 pounds. But a DC8 or a 767-200 carry about 90,000 pounds, or more than SIX TIMES that amount. A 727 freighter can carry four times that amount. An MD-11 can carry over 200,000 pounds, while a DC10 can carry 160,000 pounds. Given this, it's hard to imagine (other than as a result of sheer bulk of packages) why some extra space isn't available via DHL or FedEx or UPS on one of their birds.

I guess the bottom line is that if it keeps accumulating, then it will ultimately be worthwhile to charter an aircraft to haul it to a larger distribution hub, where space will be more plentiful to get it to the US mainland.

CO probably misses the revenue, though.

Best,

Bill


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25385 posts, RR: 49
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3120 times:

Quoting Wjcandee (Reply 8):
I guess the bottom line is that if it keeps accumulating, then it will ultimately be worthwhile to charter an aircraft to haul it to a larger distribution hub, where space will be more plentiful to get it to the US mainland.

USPS has been lately been using a weekly Kalitta B747F to operate HNL-GUM.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29799 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3044 times:

Quoting Wjcandee (Reply 8):
This looks like just a little logistics problem for the USPS

More like a big logistics problem. Particularly if these flights serve communities on remote islands that don't have other air service available.

Makes you wonder if the USPS could yank the entire mail contract over it.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3660 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3006 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 9):
USPS has been lately been using a weekly Kalitta B747F to operate HNL-GUM.

Unfortunately, the problem is GUM-HNL. Kalitta only flies HNL-GUM, allowing no problem for mail headed to GUM. The only freighter flying GUM-HNL is Asia Pacific Airlines, flying 727Fs to HNL twice a week.

Quoting GuamVICE (Thread starter):
but I was wondering if there are similar cases to this...

I'm wondering if this affects the whole USPS system or only certain areas? I work for a foreign airline here in HNL that does carry US military mail from Asia and almost all those parcels are over 16oz, and tend to weigh around 30lbs each. I haven't done mail for a while, but we do get parcels that are over 16ozs. I also wonder if American Samoa is having the same problems?


User currently offlineGuamVICE From Guam, joined Jun 2005, 151 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (9 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2842 times:

The USPS will have no problem getting a replacement carrier. It's CO that'll suffer the revenue loss...The GUM-HNL and HNL-GUM route is CO's most successful route as indicated by Continental CEO Larry Kellner in an earlier press release to the company... and in the meantime...GUM residents will just have to find alternative methods to ship their goods to their families and friends in the mainland...


The two most engaging powers of a photographer are to make new things familiar and to make familiar things new. ~Thacker
User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (9 years 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2818 times:

Quoting Ha763 (Reply 11):
Unfortunately, the problem is GUM-HNL. Kalitta only flies HNL-GUM, allowing no problem for mail headed to GUM. The only freighter flying GUM-HNL is Asia Pacific Airlines, flying 727Fs to HNL twice a week

That's unusual, but makes sense.
The flow of goods into Guam, is probably much greater than what it generates...what else does Guam produce besides people, and mail?

So if Kalitta only serves Guam from Honolulu, where does this flight return to if not Hawai'i?

What is the cargo consist of that this Asia Pacific sends to HNL?
Do they run the route in reverse?



Delete this User
User currently offlineCOSPN From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Oct 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (9 years 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2737 times:

they Go LAX-HNL-GUM-HKG-ANC-LAX

User currently offlineTsnamm From United States of America, joined May 2005, 628 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2701 times:

GUM/SPN ship/produce fresh fish (they ship tons of tuna to Japan)...garments for companies like Ann Taylor.Liz Claiborne, Polo, and Perry Ellis to name a few...theres a LOT of freight and mail coming out of Guam and the Northern Marianas Islands...

User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3660 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (9 years 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2670 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Stirling (Reply 13):
So if Kalitta only serves Guam from Honolulu, where does this flight return to if not Hawai'i?

This week's flight goes LAX-HNL-GUM-HKG-KHV-ANC-LAX. KHV is Khabarovsk.

Quoting Stirling (Reply 13):
What is the cargo consist of that this Asia Pacific sends to HNL?

Fish, fish, and more fish. A lot of it is headed for out of state and Japan. Weird routing don't you think? MAJ-HNL-NRT and KIX, flying backwards to get fish to Japan.

Quoting Stirling (Reply 13):
Do they run the route in reverse?

Yes, they do. The routing is GUM-MAJ-HNL and HNL-MAJ-GUM, with ROR sometimes scheduled between GUM-MAJ and PNI between MAJ-GUM.


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25385 posts, RR: 49
Reply 17, posted (9 years 2 days ago) and read 2534 times:

It looks like until the USPS / TSA sort out this issue the US military will help move mail from Guam to Hawaii.

http://biz.yahoo.com/bizj/050919/1165882.html?.v=1



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26495 posts, RR: 75
Reply 18, posted (9 years 2 days ago) and read 2535 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 10):
Makes you wonder if the USPS could yank the entire mail contract over it.

No, because then CO would have a cause of action against the US Government for lost revenue, which of course both the TSA and the USPS are part of

Quoting Ha763 (Reply 16):
This week's flight goes LAX-HNL-GUM-HKG-KHV-ANC-LAX. KHV is Khabarovsk.

Winds or weights causing that?



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Continental Sued By Air France Over Concorde.... posted Wed Sep 27 2000 14:00:38 by Hole_courtney
Continental At Guam posted Sat May 14 2005 09:30:01 by AirWillie6475
Continental To Take Over LGA? posted Thu Dec 16 2004 08:07:23 by Rjpieces
Heavy Problem Over Upstate NY-Fri 7/16 posted Sun Jul 18 2004 07:01:09 by KITH
F9 A319 To Do Fly Over With F-16's posted Tue Mar 30 2004 21:36:44 by Ual747den
Continental Micronesia Guam-Honolulu posted Wed Nov 26 2003 23:16:03 by Ams
Do Continental Micronesia Still Fly Guam-Cairns? posted Tue Nov 12 2002 02:08:58 by VirginFlyer
Continental To Guam. posted Fri Dec 21 2001 00:07:04 by Airplanetire
Chartered Continental 737 In Guam? posted Wed Apr 11 2001 19:49:34 by Timbabwe
Continental's Newest Hub-Guam posted Sun Nov 12 2000 00:51:55 by Republic