Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could You Envision UA Modifying Their Livery?  
User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1397 times:

Sort of update it a bit, to better reflect the combination of UA/US? Do you think UA would keep the US Airways stylized flag? I personally hope they get away from that drab grey fuselage. The US Airways colors definitely have a more classier look. But, then again, my opinion is very biased. All UA would have to do is reverse the colors from bottom to top, top to bottom. I think we can put this to the test, during the transition (interim) period, when they slap a United sticker on the former US Airways' aircraft. Can anyone picture this, right now? Hmmm. Anyone have any thoughts they might like to add?

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1263 times:

Well, no, but then again, I could envision it when they did it the last time either!  


Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineCapt.Fantastic From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 697 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1257 times:

I do not think United will keep, nor modify the stylistic flag of US Airways. An altered United livery sounds like a strong possibility, given the large number of aircraft that need to be painted. I happen to totally love the orange, red, blue stripe combo, and the imfamous United "U" on the tail. These are United trademakrs, and wil stay no matter what, in my opinion. I thinka reversal of colors on the fuselage would be a nice idea: dark blue on top, and grey on the bottom, with he tri-color strip between. Grey tail with a larger "U".

Jim


User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1226 times:

That sounds interesting Capt. Fantastic. You're right, with all the planes that have to be painted, it would probably be a good time to rethink the design scheme.

User currently offlineAsdf From Austria, joined Mar 2014, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1221 times:

White replacing the gray, and dark blue text. Keep everything else the same.

User currently offlineBlink182 From Azerbaijan, joined Oct 1999, 5479 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1211 times:

I personally hate UA's livery and i think it would look like a computerized sketch that i forgot who it was but he put an A-330 in a post that would probably be the new livery if UA were to change.


Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11160 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1203 times:

That livery is taken. It's called Continental.


Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineGnomon From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1186 times:

Before the merger, UA had already planned to update the livery in a few years to reflect the new U N I T E D titling now being seen on UA-related publications. From a UA design team representative whom I asked about a week before the merger announcement:

"Usually airline identity programs start with painting the plane and then making everything else match. In UA's
program we are changing all the things customers come in contact with first, then we'll change the livery as final indication that a true and meaningful transformation has taken place. That said, we don't plan to make any livery changes for few years."

Now, though, I would expect a livery change to be made once the DoJ approves the merger and US is formally merged with UA next year.


User currently offlineImkeww From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1170 times:

I envision a tale with a dark blue to light blue to white gradient, with an embossed/embedded cut-off "U" as you see an all their printed publications now. I predict that the fueselage will be solid, royal (i.e. lighter than Navy) Blue on the bottom, and a navy blue or black thick band of cheatline starting above the door where the red/orange/blue used to be on UA planes and white/red used to be on the US Airways planes, and a white top with large black block letters U N I (funky T) E D a la Delta and the classic United "U" in red and blue next to the name. The engines would also be royal blue. For a visual hint at my idea, surf over to united.com and take a look at the coloring there!

User currently offlineTexairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1150 times:

I think United's current livery already looks like a transition livery. Explain how an airline with red, royal blue, and orange has aircraft that are predominantly dark/midnight blue and grey? The "U" on the tail looks totally out of place to me. I think they need to go back to the 80's livery.

User currently offlineNa From Germany, joined Dec 1999, 10601 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1141 times:

United grey/blue - looks nice. Its different, looks somewhat classy to me.
It only doesn´t wheather very good. I saw a shiny 747-400 next to a very dirty 777 with faded colours last weekend. But even that looked special next to Continentals more boring brandnew 777.
But United should keep its outstanding livery, its still fresh, I like the typeface - nothing´s wrong about it.


User currently offlineUALfa@jfk From United States of America, joined May 2000, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1133 times:

I've always hated that gray "grim reaper" paint scheme. The design team should have at least incorporated the sweeping "U" next to the UNITED AIRLINES titling. This would've brought a little color to that otherwise depressingly drab fuselage. What was Stephen Wolf thinking when he went with that hideous design? Although I realize the Company needed to update its image, I still miss the old cheery & bright white fuselage of the 70s & 80s.

Whatever they change it to (if they change it at all) couldn't be any worse than what we see now.


User currently offlineAsdf From Austria, joined Mar 2014, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1134 times:

How is the change I suggested going to make United's livery into Continental's? Continental has a white body with dark blue text, and a light gray bottom. The one I suggested has a white body with dark blue text. Everything else stays the same, which means that United's planes will keep the dark blue bottom, which Continental's planes do not have. I think the change would make their planes look alot like those of British Airways. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear.

User currently offlineORD From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 1381 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1134 times:

United no longer uses the orange, red and blue (except for the thin stripes on the planes). Those aren't their colors, and haven't been seen January 1993. That's your explanation as to why everything is gray and dark blue. It's called change.

User currently offlineTexairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1127 times:

ORD, what about the "U" on the tail? Why have them if they are not their colors? Just asking for clarification.

User currently offlineOozabooza From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1124 times:

I happen to like the United color scheme. It is relaxing. Maybe they should just change their name to United S Airways. I'm kidding of course.

User currently offlineJohn From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1374 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1106 times:

Well, no one really answered my question. How do you think a US Airways aircraft will look, with a United sticker slapped on it?

User currently offlineUALfa@jfk From United States of America, joined May 2000, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1107 times:

I suppose the sweeping "U" on a US Airways paint scheme would look all right, just as long as they make the "U" the same color as the current grayish flag.

User currently offlineImkeww From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (14 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

Take a looksee, sir... I answered your question in my previous post!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Varig, You Got To Love Their Livery :-) posted Mon Aug 9 2004 03:27:41 by A388
UA And Their New Livery posted Thu Sep 9 2004 11:57:28 by Na
Avod - Could AA And UA Soon Follow? posted Thu Jan 4 2007 23:19:32 by 1337Delta764
Why Did Am Change Their Livery? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 20:37:40 by ATLFlyer323
Current UA Mainline New Livery List posted Fri Sep 8 2006 23:02:19 by Polar1
A Small Thank You To UA posted Fri May 26 2006 20:12:31 by JBLUA320
Could Delta Adopt An All-new Livery? posted Mon May 1 2006 02:32:21 by 1337Delta764
Could Airlines "offshore" Their Flight Crews? posted Fri Feb 3 2006 23:04:46 by Poitin
What Year Did AA & UA Retire Their DC-10s? posted Mon Aug 8 2005 06:52:04 by Squirrel83
To Share With You... A Terrible UA Experience posted Wed Jul 27 2005 04:45:17 by 777KLM