Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Can You Imagine A World Of 2 (underwings) Holers?  
User currently offlineIberiadc852 From Spain, joined May 2005, 270 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 12 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2292 times:

Well, now that I have more space, I will explain the situation better:

Now that:

- The longest-haul airliner is a 777, which is clearly selling better than
the 340.

- Airbus substitute for 200-300 series is a 2-holer (the 350).
(For the 500-600 we still don't know)

- Many 773 are substituting 747's, which have practically stopped
selling.

- The future of 380 doesn't look so bad, but it's still unclear

- Even EMB-170-190 success is changing the standard looks of regional
planes.

- And of course, the absolute kingdom in medium narrowbodies of A320-
737's

So the real question I wanna make is:

How much interest would aviation lose for you if the "worst 2 holers underwings panorama" became real?


variety is the spice of life; that's what made the "old times" so good
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJush From Germany, joined Apr 2005, 1636 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 12 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2271 times:

Yeah it is pretty boring. But i see it from another site. Many 747s A340 and soon A380 despite some of them are barely sold anymore (not matching for the A380) will remain in the sky for quite a time to come.
So the scenario which you are talking about shouldn't become real pretty soon.
Then again the look of two holers is not that boring. Imagine to see a T7/200LR landing after a 787 landed. That would be two completely different and amazing sites.
That would made my day in a few years.
And i have to admit, though i'm airbus fan and truly support the A380 project, i will always rather watch T7's and 787s landing in the future than an A380.
Once you get used to see that huge bird i reckon it just remains ugly...

Regards
jush



There is one problem with airbus. Though their products are engineering marvels they lack passion, completely.
User currently offlineZSOFN From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1413 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (8 years 12 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2266 times:

Quoting Jush (Reply 1):
Once you get used to see that huge bird i reckon it just remains ugly...

What?? It's all about the bendy wings  Smile


User currently offlineLegacy135 From Switzerland, joined May 2005, 1052 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (8 years 12 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2254 times:

Sad but true  Sad The airplane world of the future does pretty much look as the ones with "the prop in the nose" will be the turboprops, the ones with "the engines in the back" the biz jets and "the ones with the 2 engines under the wing" the airliners...

User currently offlineIberiadc852 From Spain, joined May 2005, 270 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 12 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2202 times:

Quoting Legacy135 (Reply 3):

Yes, that's a good sum-up.

In this forum it is continously debated the future and success of aircraft from a commercial product point of view, but I think we shouldn't forget that nowadays, the few remaining DC-10, MD-11, MD-80, the still many 747,340 and the next in service 380, are what give a little "joy" to nowadays aviation's landscape, and without them, maybe some of us (me at least), would not even appreciate the 2 holers the same.

Quoting Jush (Reply 1):
Once you get used to see that huge bird i reckon it just remains ugly...

I remember when I first saw the design of 767 and 777, I found their tails quite ugly (especially the 777's, too thin, tall, and plain), but as very partial aspect of the plane I finally got used to them. In the same way, I think that with the A380, in general it will be easier to get used to its nose, (and the tail, which I also find out of proportion), than to its size. And, besides, I hope God listens to me  pray  and make the A380-900 succeed, because, as I find it much better proportioned, I am sure many of the A380 detractors would change their opinions.



variety is the spice of life; that's what made the "old times" so good
User currently offlineTomFoolery From Austria, joined Jan 2004, 529 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (8 years 12 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2099 times:

Dont panic!
The Chineese have receintly unveiled a plan for the ARJ 21 which will carry around 70-90 pax. It is due out in '08, however one site www.aerosite.net/arj21.htm has completely different information.
I am rather partial to the aft mounted a/c because you dont have to spend quite so much money to sit on the quieter end of the engines, ,unless you are in the last 5 or 6 rows.



Paper makes an airplane fly
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Can You Get Off Of A Diversion? posted Wed Jan 18 2006 15:48:09 by N723GW
Can You Imagine 777 With 4 Engines? posted Tue Nov 29 2005 23:34:17 by AirCanada014
Jeez, Can You Imagine This The Next Day? posted Mon Dec 10 2001 01:48:21 by EGGD
Can You Parachute Out Of A Commercial Airliner? posted Sun Sep 23 2001 07:00:24 by Bobcat
Can You Imagine? posted Wed Nov 8 2000 19:36:28 by Lamyl_hhlco
Can You Tour The Graveyards Of The Southwest? posted Fri Jun 25 2004 02:51:07 by IflyORL
Can You Use Just Half Of A R/t Ticket? posted Sat Jul 13 2002 04:11:27 by PROSA
Can You See All Types Of Planes @ Your Airport? posted Tue Feb 26 2002 09:19:11 by Godbless
Can You Tell Me The Regs Of These Planes I Was On? posted Sun Feb 3 2002 03:12:44 by Airplanetire
Can You Tell Me More About The F/A Job? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 00:45:47 by KLM672