Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
FAA Set To Approve ORD Expansion  
User currently offlineCsturdiv From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 1445 posts, RR: 3
Posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3263 times:

Just heard on the local radio this morning here in the Chicago area that the Chicago Sun Times is reporting that the FAA is set to approve the ORD expansion. They are saying that the FAA will have an announcement tomorrow approving Mayor Scandle, I mean Mayor Daley's ORD expansion plans.

Craig


Posting from somewhere between KORD and KRFD
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNYC777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 5731 posts, RR: 48
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3256 times:

Once the FAA approval is given what other steps are needed before they finally start work at ORD?


That which does not kill me makes me stronger.
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3224 times:

Quoting NYC777 (Reply 1):
Once the FAA approval is given what other steps are needed before they finally start work at ORD?

Step 1. King Richard unleashes the houndsbulldozers on Elk Grove Village in the middle of the night.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5146 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3203 times:

Does anybody have a link to the plans for the expansion?


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3187 times:

O'Hare Modernization Program


When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11387 posts, RR: 62
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3186 times:

Here's the article:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-hare29.html

Quoting Csturdiv (Thread starter):
They are saying that the FAA will have an announcement tomorrow approving Mayor Scandle, I mean Mayor Daley's ORD expansion plans.

While I don't particularly like Daley, nor agree with just about any of his politics, I personally think that ORD expansion is one of the single most important economic issues for the Chicagoland region, and the U.S. The chronic delays that plague O'Hare -- the nation's only dual-hub airport -- are causing economic ripples across the nation for not only the airlines (American and United in particular, of course) but also for businesses and business travelers who are forced to endure delays, ATC holds, etc.

Expanding O'Hare simply makes sense. It does not make sense to build another airport for Chicago, in Peotone or anywhere else, that would even further segregate air service in the region. O'Hare is a global hub and, with this expansion, will remain this way.

Quoting N328KF (Reply 2):
Step 1. King Richard unleashes the houndsbulldozers on Elk Grove Village in the middle of the night.

Yeah. Let's hope that Daley doesn't pull another Meigs and just creep in under the darkness of night!

[Edited 2005-09-29 16:58:37]

User currently offlineKBMIFlyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3176 times:

O'hare Expansion website

Sorry, duplicate post of the link.

[Edited 2005-09-29 17:02:07]

User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5155 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3128 times:

I saw an article in the Chicago Tribune last week that questioned the layout. It didn't question the need for expansion, but apparently, the airlines feel left out of the process.

IIRC, AA felt that adding 1 east-west runway and lengthening the other 2 east-west runways would work as well in cutting down the delays.

The problem with the proposed layout of 6 parallel runways is that it increases by a very high factor the number of aircraft the must cross an active runway.

Now, if you think about it, every arriving aircraft at ATL and LAX must cross an active departure runway, so I don't entirely buy the argument. And having aircraft taxi across an active runway, in my mind, is preferable to having two active runways intersect each other.

The other supposed problem with the proposed layout is that, while it cuts down delays with the current amount of traffic, the delays will revert to current levels, as traffic increases to the increased capacity of 1.6 million operations.

The problem is that UA is not about to start adding a great deal of capacity for some time. AA isn't about to add significant capacity, either. B6 would love to start operations at ORD, but even with all of its deliveries, it's not about to ramp up to 200 or 300 daily departures.


User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5146 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3120 times:

Quoting Ckfred (Reply 7):
Now, if you think about it, every arriving aircraft at ATL and LAX must cross an active departure runway, so I don't entirely buy the argument. And having aircraft taxi across an active runway, in my mind, is preferable to having two active runways intersect each other.

Well--LAX does have the highest number of runway incursions due in part to those reasons. Several parallel runways is the most efficient method for getting more planes in and out though.



Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3069 times:

Quoting Drerx7 (Reply 8):
Well--LAX does have the highest number of runway incursions due in part to those reasons. Several parallel runways is the most efficient method for getting more planes in and out though.

Or use DEN's Swastika layout.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12784 posts, RR: 100
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2957 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Commavia (Reply 5):
I personally think that ORD expansion is one of the single most important economic issues for the Chicagoland region, and the U.S.

Very important. Glad to hear its going forward.

Quoting Ckfred (Reply 7):
And having aircraft taxi across an active runway, in my mind, is preferable to having two active runways intersect each other.

True. Also, the parallel runways will have taxiways, so crossings can be staged. LAX direly needs taxiways between the runways.

Its very critical to "uncross" the only runway suitible for long hauls at ORD. However, last I heard, the north ruway was the 1st priority.

Quoting Ckfred (Reply 7):
AA isn't about to add significant capacity, either. B6 would love to start operations at ORD, but even with all of its deliveries, it's not about to ramp up to 200 or 300 daily departures.

If ORD had fewer delays and more gates, I have *no* doubt more flights would originate there. It could be UA, AA, B6, or some other airline.

Congrats to Chicago!
Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2953 times:

I've heard that once approval is given, construction on Phase 1 (the north E/W runway) will begin practically next day.

I have my own opinions of Daley, but this is one thing he's doing right. ORD needs to be expanded, I don't care what buttons he has to push or laws he needs to bend, it's got to be done and it's got to be done NOW. Those people who got cheap houses in Bensenville will just have to accept a better house, FREE OF CHARGE, far away from the airport (that they complain about). Anyone who knows anything about commercial aviation knows that this is a necessary step not for Chicago, but for the US and even Global aviation network.


User currently offlineCHI787ORD From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 517 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2858 times:

Quoting FriendlySkies (Reply 11):
I have my own opinions of Daley, but this is one thing he's doing right. ORD needs to be expanded, I don't care what buttons he has to push or laws he needs to bend, it's got to be done and it's got to be done NOW. Those people who got cheap houses in Bensenville will just have to accept a better house, FREE OF CHARGE, far away from the airport (that they complain about). Anyone who knows anything about commercial aviation knows that this is a necessary step not for Chicago, but for the US and even Global aviation network.

I couldn't have said it better myself.


User currently offlineCactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 26
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2740 times:

Altough the planned layout involves aircraft having to taxi across parallel runways, it is still preferable to having intersecting runways. The parallel's allow for a better flow of traffic regardless of weather conditions, something that is a problem for the airport the way it is currently set up. Each of the new runways will have a taxiway running parallel to it that will aircraft to hold short until they are clear to cross. Incursions may be an issue (as has been the case in other airports with similar layouts) but new monitoring technology will be in place to ensure the safety of those aircraft on the ground.

After the FAA's approval, which is official today Friday, construction on the northernmost east-west runway (which will eventually become the new 9L/27R) will begin immediately. Ground breaking for the project will be at 1400 CST on Friday.


User currently offlineFlyBoy84 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 382 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2736 times:

People keep bringing up the new layout and talking about incursions. But doesn't DFW have nearly the same layout runway-wise? I don't hear people talking about increased incursions at DFW!

It could be worse...they could've done something as goofy as STL with a runway way off to the side of the field out of relationship to the rest of the layout and the location of the terminal  hissyfit 


User currently offlineCactusA319 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2918 posts, RR: 26
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2645 times:

Quoting FlyBoy84 (Reply 14):
It could be worse...they could've done something as goofy as STL with a runway way off to the side of the field out of relationship to the rest of the layout and the location of the terminal

Not only that, but since AA scaled back the STL hub, there's no real need for that runway anymore. And there probably won't be a pressing need for it for a long time.

I was at the ORD groundbreaking ceremony today listening to a.net's favorite mayor and other dignataries try to speak under a steady stream of 32R departures (the ceremony was held right off the end of the runway) before doing the traditional shoveling signifying the start of the project. The backhoes and dump trucks are now in action and the O'Hare Modernization Program is underway!


User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12784 posts, RR: 100
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2576 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Congrats to Chicago!

Sigh, I wish LAX could join ORD in expanding...

Quoting CactusA319 (Reply 13):

After the FAA's approval, which is official today Friday, construction on the northernmost east-west runway (which will eventually become the new 9L/27R) will begin immediately. Ground breaking for the project will be at 1400 CST on Friday.

Good to hear no time is being wasted.  Smile

When does ORD get more terminals? It seems a few airlines are waiting for gates.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineAdam T. From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 957 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2482 times:

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 16):
Sigh, I wish LAX could join ORD in expanding...

Aren't there plans for a reconstruction of runways and the north terminals at LAX?

Also, I read that the expansion of O'Hare has been halted by a Federal Court. Any opinions from our Chicago A.Netters?

[Edited 2005-10-03 08:18:05]

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Dutch Set To Approve KLM And Air France Tie-up posted Thu Sep 25 2003 12:19:49 by Kl911
SNA Set To Approve Higher Annual Passenger Counts posted Fri Dec 6 2002 20:35:27 by FATFlyer
FAA To Hold Three Public Hearings On ORD Expansion posted Tue Feb 22 2005 20:06:25 by KarlB737
FAA Plans To Extend Flight Cap At ORD Til Oct. 28 posted Thu Mar 16 2006 23:39:13 by KarlB737
WJ Set To Annouce Expansion Of Service In YYZ posted Wed Jan 14 2004 00:05:29 by CanadaEH
ANC Construction Set To Begin posted Mon Nov 27 2006 22:15:57 by Chugach
Air India Set To Join Star Alliance posted Thu Nov 23 2006 22:15:08 by Karan69
FAA License To JAR License. What Must I Do? posted Mon Nov 6 2006 00:55:24 by Thepilot730
FI: Airbus To Ask Board To Approve A350 XWB posted Mon Oct 23 2006 10:21:23 by Leelaw
International Flights Set To Return To MSY posted Sat Oct 14 2006 15:18:28 by MSYtristar