Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The 757  
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4555 posts, RR: 5
Posted (17 years 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

What is everyone's opinion of the B757? I personally think it is a great aircraft that is one of the most economical aircraft in the industry. I also like the idea of all the Rolls Royce power.

"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDazed767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5519 posts, RR: 49
Reply 1, posted (17 years 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

Although it's economical, I don't consider it one of the most comfortable.

User currently offline757-200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (17 years 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

You are talking to the right person. It was only two years ago when I found out there was anything beyond a 747, and the 757 was the one I liked best. Later I started looking into it, and started to like everything about it. Soon I started liking MD-80, but it didn't last long! About 8 months ago I decided I was going to become a Delta 757 pilot. It turned from a love to an obsession, and I dreamt (seriously, DREAMT!) about 757s. Now (usually) I can tell when a 757 is paasing overhead a cruise altitude when I hear the echo of its engines from the atmosphere above. I tell you, I am head-over-heels and upside down over 757s! I really don't care if anyone has a negative opinion over a 757, I love everything about it, even the landing gear! And I also think it looks great in any paint scheme. You just can't make a 757 look bad! What I'd give to fly one right now... Fly 757-200!.......Forever!

User currently offlineBryanG From United States of America, joined May 1999, 453 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (17 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

Not just one of the most efficient, the 757-300 is THE most efficient according to Boeing. They say that its seat-mile operationg costs are a full 10% less than the 757-200, which was already the leader. I don't dream about the plane at night, but I am looking forward to next month when I go back to my summer job working on them at the UPS ramp at GSO.

User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (17 years 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

I like it a lot no matter which class of service I'm in. UA's are very comfortable (with the new seats in YC...a little on the stiff side, though...). It's no different than flying an A320 or 737 (oh...woohoo!! A whole extra INCH in the seat just for me!). They are quiet, even if you are in the last row, and there's just something about them that is appealing to me.


User currently offlineAA777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2560 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (17 years 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

I love the 757 also, I find the Landing Gear of the 757 really cool looking, like talons of an eagle. It has the most amazing look to it, tall and slim, large wings & huge engines. It is quiet on takeoff, even from St.Thomas where the pilots literally sit at the end of the runway with the brakes on and push the engines up to full power.
I love the 757 in AA livery!

User currently offlineJames From Taiwan, joined Dec 2002, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (17 years 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

There's no doubt that the 757 is a beautiful aircraft to look at and it's a 'real' pilot's airplane.
From a passenger's point of view the 757 (and any other Boeing narrowbodies) just aren't as comfortable as the Airbus A320 family. The A320 family has a wider cabin and even in a maximum-density configuration has better legroom (seat-pitch) than Boeing narrowbodies in a maximum-density configuration.
I'm no Airbus fan, and I think the 747 and 777 have far more passenger appeal than the A330/A340, but in the narrowbody comfort stakes, Airbus wins.
Also, getting off a fully-laden single-aisle 757 when they're using one forward door and you're sitting near the back takes an awfully long time.

User currently onlineAmerican 767 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4638 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (17 years 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

Hi I'm Ben,
I really like the Boeing 757, especially that of American Airlines. Why American? Because I like that airline and that's what I always fly. I think it's a very nice aircraft in many ways, one is in a technology point of view, one is passenger comfort and another one is its beauty in general. Of course American is the ultimate choice, but the 757 looks beautiful in any livery.
American is one of the most important 757/767 operators worldwide and they have now about a hundred 757's, the 757 will be at American for many many years to come. I love to watch a 757 take off, oh boy that's great! I've been on 757's of different US airlines, both with RR and PW engines, well I noticed the difference. The Rolls Royce engines are more powerful and make more noise than the Pratt Whitney engines. American, which received its first 757 ten years ago, uses them with Rolls Royce engines on various domestic routes like for example Miami-Dallas, as well as long transcon flights. What I enjoy the most on a 757 flight is the take off.

Ben Soriano
Brussels Belgium

Ben Soriano
User currently offlineMikeGins From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (17 years 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1091 times:

James wrote:
Also, getting off a fully-laden single-aisle 757 when they're using one forward door and you're sitting near the back takes an awfully long time.


No kidding. After a nice, five-hour cross-country flight, what I REALLY want to do is stand there in row 382 waiting for the lady about two miles ahead of me (in row 147) to get her act together and realize that it is indeed possible to maneuver a roll-on bag through a plane while carrying a purse!

I think the worst experience I had with a 757 was when I was seated in the second-to-last row. They opened the door and I checked my watch. 5:45. When I finally walked off the jetramp, I checked my watch again. 6:10 Twenty-five minutes just to get off the stupid plane!

That said, they are normally pretty comfortable airplanes, they get you where you want to get, and as long as you aren't way at the back of the plane in row six billion, they're just as good as any plane that Airbus can put together.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is The 757 So Succesfull As A Cargoplane? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 14:01:43 by AbleToFly
Why 20 Years To Use The 757 As Intended? posted Tue Oct 10 2006 09:36:37 by N328KF
If The 757-300 Were Offered Earlier... posted Mon Sep 11 2006 01:02:57 by 1337Delta764
YYZ And The 757 posted Sun Sep 10 2006 05:35:54 by GoBlue
Has El Al Ever Operated The 757-300? posted Thu Sep 7 2006 14:16:13 by LY777
Can Boeing Ever Replace The 757? posted Mon Aug 28 2006 23:10:24 by KSUpilot
Fedex And The 757 posted Wed Aug 2 2006 05:26:44 by Mason747
Iberia And The 757 posted Sun Jul 2 2006 23:26:05 by LY777
Is The 757 Being Reborn Or Just Being Used Better? posted Thu Jun 1 2006 16:22:48 by BHXDTW
USA 3000 And The 757? posted Wed Mar 8 2006 20:05:08 by Petermax777