Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
British Airways/KLM Merger! What Do U Think?  
User currently offlineBritAir From United Kingdom, joined Aug 1999, 933 posts, RR: 14
Posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2801 times:

Well it's official, hot on the heals of UA/US, British Airways and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines have confirmed that they are in merger talks.

What I am interested in is what people think will happen to KLMuk, Go, Buzz, BASE, Wings, oneworld, American, Northwest etc etc?

Will the new company be called "British Airways"? It would be a shame to lose the KLM name or for that matter the British Airways name if the decide a new image is needed for the merged airline. Hmmm...BAKLM or KLMBA?? Maybe!

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Josh Rawlin

(sorry about using BA's old colours, but i couldnt find another photo with KLM in it)

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5601 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2758 times:

I think they do the same as SR and SN did and keep their names, brands and identities.
The most interesting question will be the american partner. If AA buys NW there will be no problem (besides antitrust immunity), if not, NW stays perhaps with BA/KLM and AA goes strong with Qualiflyer????

User currently offlineSR3496 From Switzerland, joined May 2000, 792 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2755 times:

Identities and names will stay (I hope so).

But with the NAmerican partner airline I'm still not sure. I think that BA/KLM will stay with NW, if AA doesn't buy NW!
But if AA goes together with NW, then KLM/BA will have to move to Continental/America West and the new AA will leave Oneworld and will join Qualiflyer.

User currently offlineDjmatthews From United Kingdom, joined Dec 1999, 213 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2737 times:

I think BA are taliking about a take over rather than a merger, this will mean both companies will keep their own identity, but they will have one managment team (although it will be larger), therefore cutting costs at the top end of the company hierachy.

hopefully, the type of service will be standardised, i.e. I Hhope KLMs service will match that of BA, lets face it the KLM service isn't anything special.

As for the alliences, code share agreements etc. We will see BA and AA and the one world alliance, then KLM, NW and their parters alll combined into one. The whole company would need a big rethink into the way it is run. Maybe a whole merger of BA, AA, NW and KLM would be the best with huns in AMS ans LHR!

It's very complicated!

User currently offlineBOS-CDG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2734 times:

If it goes through, it will mean a lot of layoffs as the two companies struggle financially this year...

It could be a good deal for BA to use Schiphol as a hub to alleviate LHR, but Schiphol has nearly reached its maximum allowed capacity (they could handle more flights but they won't be allowed for environmental reasons).

It could also speed up some other airlines to do something...Alitalia, Iberia etc...I'd like Iberia and Air France closer together, with BA dumping its participation in Iberia...


User currently offlineA student From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2728 times:

The one thing that is annoying me the most is that probably, Buxx, KLMUK and Go will have to become one airline. There is no sense in having those three competing with each other if it is one company, is there? And after that, there's only Ryanair and Easyjet left (Virgin Express is Brussels-centered, so not very active in the UK). I liked the variety of low-cost airlines. Too bad BA will eventually either ruin them through Go or eat them up.....

That is my opinion, based purely on estimations and not on any official documents I could quote.

User currently offlineScotty From UK - Scotland, joined Dec 1999, 1875 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2726 times:

It will mean that the new company will control most of the AMS services from non-London airports in the UK. Is there a monopoly situation developing on these routes? Thanks to BA, through GO taking over some of the Stansted routes, AirUK (now KLMuk) abandoned their STN routes and concentrated on feeding into KLM at AMS. I am concerned that these AMS links will now go and the so called "regional" airports in the UK will lose their direct links with AMS, with everything channeled via LHR or LGW.

User currently offlineChiuaua From Netherlands, joined Apr 2000, 113 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 2696 times:

As I have a blue (KLM) heart, I think it would be a pity if KLM was taken over. It really hurts when some large foreign company buys your original dutch one. I know I'm a real chauvinist.

If KLM is taken over, I am quite sure that the UK activities (KLMuk) have to be sold due to anti-trust. This also means that Buzz gets in other hands as it is a KLMuk daughter.

I know KLM has to find a European partner and it's a pity that it didn't work out with Alitalia. KLM was so much stronger a few years ago, but now they're continiously fighting losses. In the past they had the (financial) capability to take over Northwest. They should've done that immediately. Now it's too late and KLM is a pray due to its own ego of not willing to cooperate, when it had the chance.

User currently offlineBernsa From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 93 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (15 years 11 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2690 times:

I don't think KLM/BA would be so quick to run into the Continental camp. Continental and KLM don't really get along, and don't as of yet acknowledge or act towards each other as partners. The only thing linking KLM and CO is NW. Continental doesn't even code-share NW's service into Amsterdam.

In addition Continental has already paired up with Virgin and British Midland to some extent, so I don't see CO and BA hooking up anytime soon.

Continental is weird... they've got partners who are entrenched with other alliances (BD, Air France, Alaska/Horizon in particular).

Honestly, I don't think AA/NW is serious... NW already rebuffed them and seem more committed to maintaining the CO/NW/AS relationship than ever, the latest press releases are indicating that they are expanding those code shares.

Not sure what's going in with CO and AS though (check my post "Continental's Codeshares" from Tuesday).

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
South African Airways What Do U Think? posted Thu Sep 6 2001 16:36:10 by BA-747
TW/AW Merger...What Do You Think? posted Sat Aug 19 2000 22:00:37 by AAtripleseven
Was The Sonic Cruiser A Mistake? What Do U Think? posted Mon Dec 30 2002 01:36:41 by USAir330
What Do U Think Of This Air Alps Plane? posted Tue Nov 20 2001 07:10:45 by Jiml1126
BOI: Only 5 Airlines Served. What Do U Think Of Th posted Mon Aug 6 2001 06:29:48 by RogeLuca
British Airways "Pay What You Weigh" posted Wed Jul 11 2001 00:58:56 by Capt.Picard
What Do U Think Of Bwia? posted Wed May 23 2001 05:05:51 by Captaink
BA's Public Behaviour, What Do U Think? posted Wed Feb 7 2001 23:59:01 by TF-FIW
What Do U Think About SN - Sabena Belgian Airlines posted Fri Oct 20 2000 01:39:29 by Pat
Will AA Order The 747 If DL Does? What Do U Think? posted Wed Aug 2 2000 02:26:33 by Blink182