Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Now, AA And CO Are The Only Ones..........  
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3552 times:

Hi!

It looks to me that after NW and DL filled CH. 11 for banckrupcy protection only AA and CO are the ones that keep going on???
I've seen a lot of bad experiences when they talk about AA and CO but infact these two airlines keep going on without CH. 11. I think we must give them our aplause! What do you have to say about that when we see UA, US still protected with that CH 11 and now joined by NW and DL, two quite strong airlines and with a great heritage behind???
Regards

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3523 times:

Quoting CV990 (Thread starter):
I've seen a lot of bad experiences when they talk about AA and CO but infact these two airlines keep going on without CH. 11. I think we must give them our aplause!

You know something's wrong when we feel we must applaud companies for NOT seeking Chapter 11!

Oh, and US has formally exited Ch 11. So now it's just DL, NW, and UA.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineSunValley From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3507 times:

Continetal has had her day there in the past.

User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7532 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

Quoting CV990 (Thread starter):
AA and CO are the ones that keep going on

Don't hold your breath.


User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8373 posts, RR: 10
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3417 times:

Quoting VV701 (Reply 3):
Don't hold your breath.

I agree. There's no way AA and CO will be able to compete with the new, leaner, post BK, UA, DL, and NW. Especially without shedding their respective pension obligations.


User currently offlineJFKLGANYC From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 3477 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3395 times:

"I agree. There's no way AA and CO will be able to compete with the new, leaner, post BK, UA, DL, and NW. Especially without shedding their respective pension obligations."

Really? Because if I'm correct, AA and CO were the only two airlines to post a profit last quarter. UA has been in BK closing in three years!!!! They are still nowhere near a profit.

PJ


User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16866 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3336 times:

CO is going have a 3rd Quarter Profit this year!.. Despite the two Hurricanes, the interuption of their IAH operation and high fuel prices.

For '05 CO is going report profits for Q2 and Q3.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAtrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5692 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

Out of the big six tho, AA is the only legacy airline to NEVER be in CH 11 (knock wood)

Alex



Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11631 posts, RR: 61
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3272 times:

Quoting Airbazar (Reply 4):
There's no way AA and CO will be able to compete with the new, leaner, post BK, UA, DL, and NW.

Another quote right out of the "conventional wisdom"--"Wall Street expert"--"expert analyst" playbook. Why is it so inconceivable that American and Continental will be able to compete effectively -- and profitably -- with the likes of bankrupt Delta, bankrupt Northwest, and bankrupt United? After all -- they are all bankrupt!!!, so I think American and Continental are doing something right.

Everybody has been saying the same thing for three years -- since United filed. American -- generally considered the biggest direct competitor to United -- would have "no way...to compete" against a "new, leaner, post [bankruptcy]...United," and thus they would have to file.

Guess what. United is now coming up on three years in bankruptcy. They are still under court protection, they have slashed their workforce, cut wages, axed their employees pensions. American, by contrast, has never filed for bankruptcy, is still faithfully paying into its employees pension plans, and is profitable. And, after three years of being in "fix-all" bankruptcy, Americans's costs are still lower than United's!

Quoting Airbazar (Reply 4):
Especially without shedding their respective pension obligations.

Uh, American spends less per annum, per employee, on its pension plans than Southwest spends on theirs. American's plans aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

Quoting JFKLGANYC (Reply 5):
Really? Because if I'm correct, AA and CO were the only two airlines to post a profit last quarter.

Right you are, JFKLGANYC. I guess that shoots the whole convential wisdom "you have to be bankrupt to be truly competitive" theory to death.


User currently offlineCory6188 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2686 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 3197 times:

Quoting Atrude777 (Reply 7):
Out of the big six tho, AA is the only legacy airline to NEVER be in CH 11 (knock wood)

People continually say this (and this is nothing against you personally, Alex), but in all honestly, it's not really too fair to include CO's bankruptcies from the early and mid-90s with the present slew of airlines in Chapter 11. When CO filed bankruptcy over 10 years ago, the other legacy carriers were making money - CO's management was simply atrocious and CO was losing tons and tons of cash. Gordon Bethune showed up and seriously turned the company around, finally leading it to profitability.

Honestly, I think the only fair way to compare is to talk about bankruptcies post-September 11th, which is a totally different environment, so in that regard, I applaud both AA and CO.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Race Is On: AA And CO Apply For LAX-MEX posted Fri Jan 7 2005 22:06:17 by MAH4546
757 And 767 The Only Ones With Common Type Rating? posted Mon Dec 4 2000 00:06:14 by JAT
Help! Which AA And CO Aircraft? posted Thu Dec 1 2005 15:42:37 by Candid76
AA And CO Keep MFE Dominated! posted Mon Sep 19 2005 23:06:16 by MFEFlyer
Chp 11's Affect On AA And CO? posted Thu Sep 15 2005 00:33:58 by Aa777jr
Indy Air Staff: UA, AA And US Are Hiring posted Wed Aug 10 2005 17:43:04 by Bicoastal
Official: AA And CO Get China Rights posted Tue Feb 22 2005 20:52:51 by MAH4546
B747 For AA And CO posted Mon Jan 3 2005 22:56:44 by JrMafia90
AA And STL Before The TWA Takeover. posted Sun Apr 18 2004 05:49:47 by Atrude777
AA And CO To Queretaro, Mexico? posted Fri Mar 28 2003 20:38:03 by AM