Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA Channel 9 To Hawaii  
User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3194 posts, RR: 7
Posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4226 times:

Last week, for the first time since becoming aware of Channel 9, I flew United to Hawaii. The crew announced, and it was the case, that Channel 9 would be available for takeoff and landing only. Once we were handed off from Oakland Center to San Francisco ARINC, the alternate music program began, and continued until we made contact with Honolulu Center.

Is it normal for Channel 9 to be unavailable during cruise on flights to Hawaii, or was that just the choice of the captain for the day's flight?

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4207 times:

During mid-flight, it's the captain's discretion to leave Ch.9 on ATC. The in-flight magazine may have a disclaimer saying so.

In 2002, I was on a UA HNL-LAX flight and the return flight in which the captain left Ch.9 on ATC, and heard chatter among pilots en route. On both flights, I heard pilots from other flights looking for new altitude, because of turbulence.



"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineCTHEWORLD From Mayotte, joined Dec 2004, 478 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4104 times:

There's nothing really to listen to after Oakland hands you off, it is a better passenger experience to add the extra channel of enterntainment back in, rather than just having dead air on 9.

C


User currently offlineCapt.Fantastic From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 724 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3906 times:

I think they switch to 123.45 ... This is an open frequency that crews use to communicate weather, rides, and of course other conversation while enroute over the Pacific... Pilots may switch it off so passengers don't hear the open chatter, since its not stricly ATC.

User currently offlineOE-LDA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 3874 times:

I find it interesting that chanel 9 has not yet been defined as a security threat. So many other things have been.

By the way, if they switch to 123.45, is there not ATC coverage from the US West Coast to Hawaii?

Regards, OE-LDA


User currently offlineBRAVO7E7 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1840 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3796 times:

Typically Channel 9 is always on. It may have been because the lack of ATC over the Pacific.

User currently offlineSkibum9 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1229 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3782 times:

Quoting OE-LDA (Reply 4):
By the way, if they switch to 123.45, is there not ATC coverage from the US West Coast to Hawaii?

There is multiple radios on an airplane. Typically COM1 is used for primary communication with ARC, while COM2 is for secondary purposes, such as picking up ATIS, if not available on ACARS, monitoring 121.5 (emergency channel), talking to Flight Watch, etc.



Tailwinds!!!
User currently offlineGamps From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 469 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3756 times:

Same experience on Flt 33 (SF - Lihue) last week. Pilot announced he will leave it on, but even during departure there was music and no ATC chatter. Same story on the way back on Flt 32 - pilot announced we can listen to HNL chatter but only music again.

OTOH Channel 9 on SF to Beijing (Flt 889/888) is a real treat for ATC nuts. So many accents one can listen on this long flight..especially the Russian controller with lot of static noise who sounded as if he is in an underground bunker..


User currently offlineMcdu From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 1466 posts, RR: 17
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3710 times:

I am a UAL Capt and as for CH9 over the water here is the reason. As stated previously the #1 com is generally set to 121.5 (it is on the emerg bus in the event of an elect failure) and the #2 com to 123.45 (international air to air frequency) while in oceanic airspace. All ATC communications are made via the HF radios. While we can place the HF radios on the CH9 audio the static associated with the HF would drive anyone listening insane. We do not monitor the HF per say. We get a SELCAL check and if needed the ARINC control can contact us via the tone assigned to the airplane. They play the tone and it rings a "doorbell" tone and lights up a light in the cockpit. For the most part over the oceans we transmit more than we recieve from ARINC. In over 10 years of atlantic and pacific flying I may have been selcalled a handful of times. All this is trivia but hope it explains why we generally select the audio programming when out of normal ATC coverage.

Thanks for flying with us and glad to hear you like CH9. I like to leave it on as much as possible as I think it is something that the folks who like to listen enjoy and it sets us apart from the rest of the industry.

For the poster that thinks this is a security issue, I ask why? What does it have to do with security to know the location? Most of international fleet has a moving map in the back and would that not be a hazard also? Should I never make the "good view of the Grand Canyon" announcement? Just curious as for the reason.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21625 posts, RR: 55
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3600 times:

Quoting OE-LDA (Reply 4):
By the way, if they switch to 123.45, is there not ATC coverage from the US West Coast to Hawaii?

ATC is only as good as the radar that lets them see the planes. So when the planes disappear over the horizon (not quite sure how far this is from shore, maybe Mcdu knows), ATC has no way of knowing where the planes are - separation is achieved by assigning each plane a route, altitude and speed to fly, and the planes call in with position reports as they cross various waypoints. However, VHF radio (the normal overland kind) is limited by line-of-sight, so it's no good far over the water. HF radio is required, but this is more subject to interference, which means lots of static on the frequency. It would drive pilots nuts to have to listen to that all the time, and so they only listen to it when they're making their position reports. If ATC needs to talk to a plane, they'll use SELCAL to get the plane's attention, as Mcdu described.

With both VHF radios freed from having to communicate with ATC, they can be used for different purposes - monitoring the emergency 121.5 and the common 123.45. There would be very little to listen to on 121.5, and 123.45 might not be "G-rated", so the captain might decide to turn Channel 9 off.

Quoting Mcdu (Reply 8):
Thanks for flying with us and glad to hear you like CH9. I like to leave it on as much as possible as I think it is something that the folks who like to listen enjoy and it sets us apart from the rest of the industry.

I love Ch9, I listen to it whenever it's on, and I fly UA over other airlines whenever practical solely because of it's existence.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3194 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3537 times:

Thanks for the explanations everyone, and especially Mcdu and Mir. I've been flying UA a lot this year, and enjoy Channel 9. Having it paired with the seatback PTV on the map display on a 777 flight earlier this year was quite a treat.

Now only if United Express would get it.  Wink


User currently offlineLorM From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 409 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 3537 times:

Quoting Mcdu (Reply 8):

Thanks for flying with us and glad to hear you like CH9. I like to leave it on as much as possible as I think it is something that the folks who like to listen enjoy and it sets us apart from the rest of the industry.

Have always enjoyed it, and thank you!

Quoting Mir (Reply 9):

There would be very little to listen to on 121.5, and 123.45 might not be "G-rated", so the captain might decide to turn Channel 9 off.

Exactly the explanation I've always received. When out over the ocean and out of ATC contact, sometimes when left on channel 9 on the air to air can be quite interesting. You'll occasionally hear of candid conversations wouldn't hear on ATC controlled channel over land. If you're lucky it is left on, which happened on my last flight back home to the islands - I made sure I thanked the captain for "forgetting"  Smile.

Whenever it's turned off and the music channel is on to make sure you get it back on, at least 30 minutes to an hour out of the expected arrival time (or when you can feel the descent) just nicely ask a F/A to ask the flight crew to turn it on again, they will usually be glad to call up front if they are not busy.


Slightly O/T: Bluewave, and the rest of the Hawaii locals, scan and monitor 129.0750 when you get a chance. Alpine Aviation (Postal Contract) have been using this frequency for an air to air channel. It seems like they unoffically made this their pilot to pilot chat amongst themselves whenever they fly. I've only heard the Alpine guys on this channel no one else. Some of the conversations they have can be downright hilarious. These guys don't hold anything back when it comes to what they think of their superiors, ATC, or whatever is on their mind. Which is exactly why I do understand pilots turning off UA Ch 9 when the air to air channel is on. Search the liveatc.net audio clips forum for one of the Alpine conversations I overheard one night....

-LorM



Brick Windows
User currently offlineSvenvdM From Germany, joined Dec 2000, 209 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 3513 times:

Channel 9 a security threat? Can't imagine how. If UA serves a route I want/need to fly I choose UA just because of Channel 9. I hope they'll keep it for a long time to come.

User currently offlineOE-LDA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3372 times:

Quoting Mcdu (Reply 8):
For the poster that thinks this is a security issue, I ask why? What does it have to do with security to know the location? Most of international fleet has a moving map in the back and would that not be a hazard also? Should I never make the "good view of the Grand Canyon" announcement? Just curious as for the reason.

Just that there is no misunderstanding. I would not qualify channel 9 as a security issue, but you hear of so many thing being an issue today:

- People not allowed to take pictures inside the cabin on AA flights, especially not of FAs

- There was one case in this forum where a FA refused to give the aircraft registration to a passenger, athough it is written outside the plane.

- There are numerous stories that photographers were given a hard time when they tried to take pictures of aircraft.

It seems to me that channel 9 provides a lot more insight on the current situation of a flight than any other of the above mentioned. That was the reason I was asking.

I hope no one got me wrong, and I hope channel 9 will continue.

regards, OE-LDA


User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3248 times:

Quoting LorM (Reply 11):
Slightly O/T: Bluewave, and the rest of the Hawaii locals, scan and monitor 129.0750 when you get a chance. Alpine Aviation (Postal Contract) have been using this frequency for an air to air channel. It seems like they unoffically made this their pilot to pilot chat amongst themselves whenever they fly. I've only heard the Alpine guys on this channel no one else. Some of the conversations they have can be downright hilarious. These guys don't hold anything back when it comes to what they think of their superiors, ATC, or whatever is on their mind. Which is exactly why I do understand pilots turning off UA Ch 9 when the air to air channel is on.

Thanks for that heads-up. Will check it out one of these nights.



"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineOmoo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3233 times:

Quoting Mcdu (Reply 8):
I am a UAL Capt and as for CH9 over the water here is the reason. As stated previously the #1 com is generally set to 121.5 (it is on the emerg bus in the event of an elect failure) and the #2 com to 123.45 (international air to air frequency) while in oceanic airspace. All ATC communications are made via the HF radios. While we can place the HF radios on the CH9 audio the static associated with the HF would drive anyone listening insane. We do not monitor the HF per say. We get a SELCAL check and if needed the ARINC control can contact us via the tone assigned to the airplane. They play the tone and it rings a "doorbell" tone and lights up a light in the cockpit. For the most part over the oceans we transmit more than we recieve from ARINC. In over 10 years of atlantic and pacific flying I may have been selcalled a handful of times. All this is trivia but hope it explains why we generally select the audio programming when out of normal ATC coverage.

Thanks for flying with us and glad to hear you like CH9. I like to leave it on as much as possible as I think it is something that the folks who like to listen enjoy and it sets us apart from the rest of the industry.

For the poster that thinks this is a security issue, I ask why? What does it have to do with security to know the location? Most of international fleet has a moving map in the back and would that not be a hazard also? Should I never make the "good view of the Grand Canyon" announcement? Just curious as for the reason.

I once flew UA LHR-IAD and Ch 9 was switched off once we hit the water. Thanks for the explanation cause now it makes a lot of sense.


User currently offlineAeroWeanie From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1609 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3196 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting OE-LDA (Reply 13):
- There are numerous stories that photographers were given a hard time when they tried to take pictures of aircraft.

As we're speaking of Hawaii, I should note that two weeks ago I was told by the Wakenhut security officer at the West Maui Airport that I was not allowed to take pictures of the ramp, terminal or any airplanes.


User currently offline3201 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3148 times:

Whenever I've flown between SFO and either LHR or FRA on UA, Ch9 is on continuously the whole time. Outside of radar coverage, you hear position reports and SELCAL tests, etc., for your own aircraft and everyone else up there. Not continuous chatter, and not terribly thrilling, but kinda interesting, and I've always been glad they left it on.

When I flew SFO-LIH, they turned it off pretty early and never turned it back on. KOA-SFO, they never turned it on, not even on arrival in SFO.


User currently offlineBH346 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3265 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3116 times:

Thanks for the explanations. I've noticed that on my flights between KIX and ORD, Ch9 was off once we were over the ocean and when we followed a route that took us over the northern coast of Alaska and through Siberia, we still had Ch.9 with Markovo and Magadan Control. That route gets interesting on Ch. 9 with the transpac traffic and the controllers.


Northwest Airlines - Some People Just Know How to Fly
User currently offlineBluewave 707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3152 posts, RR: 6
Reply 19, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3062 times:

Quoting AeroWeanie (Reply 16):
As we're speaking of Hawaii, I should note that two weeks ago I was told by the Wakenhut security officer at the West Maui Airport that I was not allowed to take pictures of the ramp, terminal or any airplanes.

West Maui? JHM? There ain't nothing much to shoot. Only LW and WP. I got a shot once while walking to the Dash8.

Had no problems @ OGG while on a stopover, and I was shooting photos in plain sight.



"The best use of your life will be to so live your life, that the use of your life will outlive your life" -- D Severn
User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3194 posts, RR: 7
Reply 20, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3029 times:

I didn't have any problems the time I shot at OGG either. I was out along the bike path, there was a spot where there was a flood control channel or something, so the ground and fence line dropped, but the bike path was a bridge. I was out there for a couple hours; security folks drove by a few times but never said anything. This was after 9/11.

The only time I can recall being told to leave in Hawaii was at LIH. There was a road that went through a golf course, then became a dirt road around the perimeter fence. I think it went to a beach, I didn't take my rental Neon all the way to the end though. I was there for a while; eventually a private security guy told me I couldn't be there. Also after 9/11.


User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2927 times:

I listened to it on a LAX-HNL flight while it was on basically the whole time. The conversations during the middle of the flight mainly consisted of the flight crew verifying their position (using strings of digits that I could not decipher) with San Francisco center. I wish I could follow the conversation.

User currently offlineWestWing From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2134 posts, RR: 7
Reply 22, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2843 times:

Quoting Mcdu (Reply 8):
...glad to hear you like CH9. I like to leave it on as much as possible...

Thank you. But there are some UAL Capts who elect to not make Ch. 9 available. I'm curious what reasons are most often cited by these Capts for not turning on Ch. 9.



The best time to plant a tree is 40 years ago. The second best time is today.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21625 posts, RR: 55
Reply 23, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2750 times:

Quoting N79969 (Reply 21):
I wish I could follow the conversation.

Elements of a position report:

1) Who you are
2) Where you are (i.e. what waypoint you just passed)
3) What time you passed that waypoint
4) Your altitude
5) Your speed
6) Your next waypoint
7) Estimated arrival at that waypoint
8) Waypoint after that
9) Any other information

So, for instance:

"United 904, 53 North 40 West at 1952Z, FL350, Mach .84, Estimating 54 North 30 West at 2036Z, 54 North 20 West next, request FL370 and a SELCAL check for JN-RC (this would be the aircraft's SELCAL code)."

LiveATC.net has a North Atlantic HF feed that you can listen to if you want. Listen to the North American one in the evening when all the flights are going to Europe, and you'll hear plenty of them. The paired tones you hear are the SELCAL calls going out to the planes asking them to contact ATC on the HF radio.

-Mir

[Edited 2005-10-11 01:56:35]


7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineJe89_w From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 2361 posts, RR: 9
Reply 24, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2619 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Also noticed that channel 9 was switched off after departure from SIN and NRT back in 2003. Too bad, it would've been interesting to listen to the pilots having rather free conversations in flight.

Quoting LorM (Reply 11):
Slightly O/T: Bluewave, and the rest of the Hawaii locals, scan and monitor 129.0750 when you get a chance. Alpine Aviation (Postal Contract) have been using this frequency for an air to air channel. It seems like they unoffically made this their pilot to pilot chat amongst themselves whenever they fly. I've only heard the Alpine guys on this channel no one else. Some of the conversations they have can be downright hilarious. These guys don't hold anything back when it comes to what they think of their superiors, ATC, or whatever is on their mind. Which is exactly why I do understand pilots turning off UA Ch 9 when the air to air channel is on. Search the liveatc.net audio clips forum for one of the Alpine conversations I overheard one night....

Thanks, will definitely check it out!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UA Halfway To Hawaii Game posted Mon May 30 2005 14:18:30 by Js
UA 767's To Hawaii (Don't Worry, Not About PTV's) posted Tue Jul 30 2002 00:46:37 by US A333 PIT
UA BOB Expanding To DEN/ORD To Hawaii posted Wed Aug 3 2005 15:30:57 by Carfield
UA To Halt Daily Nonstop From Chicago To Hawaii posted Thu Dec 28 2000 18:44:06 by Tripleseven
UA/US A330s To Hawaii posted Tue Jun 27 2000 04:01:15 by Flyf15
Alaska To Hawaii? posted Mon Oct 30 2006 14:30:15 by Wedgetail737
When UA Fly To CAN. posted Tue Oct 24 2006 08:41:52 by Rogershen
ATA 737-800 To Hawaii... posted Sat Oct 14 2006 21:06:36 by SWABFA
Funny ATC Chat On UA Channel 9 posted Tue Oct 10 2006 02:26:54 by NDSchu777
NYC To Hawaii Questions posted Tue Aug 8 2006 02:23:52 by LGAtoIND