Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ERJ/CRJ A Comparison  
User currently offlineNwafflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1050 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 4257 times:

I'd be interested in people's thoughts on the ERJ as flown by Continental, and the CRJ as flown by Delta and NWA. Granted, the ERJ is made in Brazil, the CRJ is Canadian. Personally, I prefer the ERJ (the A side naturally), but I'd be interested in other people's thoughts and opinions.

Also, I'd be interested in statistical comparisons: speed, distance, capacity both passenger and weight, etc.

Thanks for any information

26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKcrwFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3818 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4234 times:

Are you talking about the crj 200, and erj 145? Or the Crj 440 and erj 140, or 135, or 135xr. Or Crj 700 and emb 170 or Crj 900 and emb 190? Which ones are you referring to?

User currently offlineBoeingfanyyz From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 991 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4235 times:

Nwafflyer,
Being a true Canadian (eh!) drunk  , I will always stick with our finest (Bombardier)! However, I do not mind the ERJ's at all. AC just received 7 new Embraer 175's who look pretty cool.
Cheers,
boeingfanyyz



"If it aint boeing, it aint going!", "Friends are like condoms...they protect you when things get hard!"
User currently offlineNwafflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1050 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4195 times:

I believe that NWA and Delta fly the CRJ 200, and Continental the ERJ145 - those are the planes that I am comparing

User currently offlineSupa7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4165 times:

The CRJ is a little heavier, yet it burns a little less fuel than the ERJ.

For sex appeal I would give it to the CRJ - winglets, shiny engine cowlings, sleek cockpit windows.

I have heard that the ERJ has trouble with snow/ice. The CRJ might work better there.

Some people love the ERJ seating 1-2 but I much prefer the CRJ, all things considered.


User currently offlineFokkerf28 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 152 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4161 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Personally I prefer the crj product. The cabin is larger and I like 2+2 seating.
The erj is not as good looking especially when looking at the nose section from the outside.


User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8964 posts, RR: 39
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 4131 times:

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 4):
The CRJ is a little heavier, yet it burns a little less fuel than the ERJ.

The following link might be of interest:

http://www.aviaglobal.com/displayANe...Id=8763&tfCountryId=All&tfTopicId=

Cheers



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineKcrwFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3818 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4083 times:

Personally, I think the Crj is cramped. I also like aircraft that jump off the runway like the erj. The Erj is also a camp at landings, or so pilots have told me. Based on rides on each aircraft I think the erj is a better ride. ( And that roar of the reverse is great too)

User currently offlineBNE From Australia, joined Mar 2000, 3185 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 4079 times:

The ERJ is better because it is flown by Continental Express Jet.
Also the windows are the right eye level to look out. Not like the CRJ-200 series.



Why fly non stop when you can connect
User currently offlineTornado82 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3997 times:

Quoting KcrwFlyer (Reply 7):
Personally, I think the Crj is cramped

Ding. Although an ERJ is cramped on the B/C or E/F (whatever they call the right side) as well.

Quoting BNE (Reply 8):
The ERJ is better because it is flown by Continental Express Jet.

EXACTLY!!!!!! NW's Jet-Airlink carriers are the pits for the most part compared to ExpressJet, who ranks right up with AWAC (and surpasses them only for ERJ's over CRJ's) in the market of regionals.

Quoting KcrwFlyer (Reply 7):
I also like aircraft that jump off the runway like the erj

Yeah. CRJ performance off the runway is somewhat disconcerting. They don't even seem to have the acceleration on their takeoff roll of all other jets. Likewise, being pointed nose down the whole approach, and then practically landing "flat footed" after the excuse for a flare in a CRJ, is also a bit of an uncomfortable feeling. An ERJ can get above weather the same as a mainline jet as well (easily up to FL370, even when relatively full), where a CRJ struggles to break into the RVSM airspace... and is well known for being a dog to climb once reaching the actual FL's. I never feel fully comforted in the plane's performance characteristics when in a CRJ... like I feel in a B1900 or something, but in an ERJ I feel the same as I would in a 737 or any other mainline jet. The CRJ-700 is a whole different ball game though, as they jump off the runway as if its a springboard.

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 4):
For sex appeal I would give it to the CRJ - winglets, shiny engine cowlings, sleek cockpit windows.

ERJ-145XR's have the winglets... and have the performance to walk-the-walk as well. The CRJ can just talk-the-talk.


User currently offlineKcrwFlyer From United States of America, joined May 2004, 3818 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3994 times:

Quoting Tornado82 (Reply 9):
Yeah. CRJ performance off the runway is somewhat disconcerting. They don't even seem to have the acceleration on their takeoff roll of all other jets. Likewise, being pointed nose down the whole approach, and then practically landing "flat footed" after the excuse for a flare in a CRJ, is also a bit of an uncomfortable feeling. An ERJ can get above weather the same as a mainline jet as well (easily up to FL370, even when relatively full), where a CRJ struggles to break into the RVSM airspace... and is well known for being a dog to climb once reaching the actual FL's. I never feel fully comforted in the plane's performance characteristics when in a CRJ... like I feel in a B1900 or something, but in an ERJ I feel the same as I would in a 737 or any other mainline jet. The CRJ-700 is a whole different ball game though, as they jump off the runway as if its a springboard.

As far as i know, the Erj can be at MTOW and go straight up to cruise.

And I couldnt tell we were nose down on the crj approach. I did see a comair Crj land on the nosewheel once. He floated way too long and the pilot seemd to force the plane down.

Any pilots want to comment on the flying difficulty of either aircraft? It seems that CRJ pilots dog the Erj and vise versa.


User currently offlineSuperD From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3959 times:

I don't have anything against the CRJ. I haven't flown the CRJ so I can't make a totally accurate comparison. I like the privacy of the A side, and I like the windows better on the ERJ, but I think they're equally comfortable. I have heard that some people think there's more wind noise on the ERJ. I think that was worse on the airstairs-equipped ERJs, but I will admit there's a fair amount of wind noise inside. I do personally think the ERJ's sleek fuselage makes it look sexier, but everyone always thinks their own aircraft is the best-looking one on the ramp.

Houston Center makes fun of the ERJ's climb rate, but they're comparing it to Continental's Boeings. I've never had a problem climbing to altitude or getting up to FL370. When we do climb slow, it's usually an operational choice so that we can put some distance below us in the climb. When asked to expedite the climb, the ERJs can produce a decent climb rate. It's not going to climb like a 757, but it does ok. The 135s in particular really jump off the runway. In cruise flight on the XRJs we have to pull the throttles back so we don't overspeed the limitations. The aircraft would be more than happy to speed past M.80 if we let it. From what I've heard, the ERJ is very fuel-efficient compared to other RJs.

As for landing.....that can be fun. When you start talking landings with ERJ pilots everyone has their own techniques and tips. You'll hear one captain with tons of experience on the jet advise you that this is the best way to land the airplane and then another captain with equally impressive time will tell you to do the exact opposite. It's not extremely difficult, but it keeps you on your toes during landing. The ERJ does have a tendency to float with a few knots extra speed, or slam down if the speed bleeds off too quickly. Once the mains are down, the job is only half over. The yoke has to be handled pretty aggressively to keep the nose from slamming down. Or, in the words of ERJ pilots: "You have to land it twice." On the plus side, if all the conditions are right, it is capable of producing a remarkably smooth landing. I'm kind of glad that it can be challenging to land. It's more fun and it gives a great sense of satisfaction when you grease one on.

[Edited 2005-10-10 07:26:20]

User currently offlineUAalltheway From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3940 times:

I personally find the ERJ-145s to be more comfortable and seem not as cramped as the CRJs, but maybe it just depends on the airline. I usually only fly the ERJ with CO, and CRJ with UA. Plus I love the 1 - 2 seating as compared to 2 - 2..  Smile

User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6049 posts, RR: 14
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 3937 times:

Quoting Tornado82 (Reply 9):
An ERJ can get above weather the same as a mainline jet as well

So can the CRJ.

Quoting Tornado82 (Reply 9):
where a CRJ struggles to break into the RVSM airspace... and is well known for being a dog to climb once reaching the actual FL's.

Not true. CRJ's can cruise up there with the rest of them—even fully loaded.



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineETStar From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3904 times:

Have flown the CRJ quite a bit (AC and ACA [now indy]) and and the ERJ just once (with CO - I think it was ExpressJet). I had always wanted to fly the ERJ, due to its sexiness from the outside.

Can't tell you about the tech specs or comparisons, but for some reason, found the non-centred aisle on the ERJ to be weird. I sat at a very comfortable exit row A seat, but walking to it and seeing the over B and C only bins was very unusual. The cabin also looked longer than the CRJ. The CRJ has 2x2 seating, which is somewhat comfortable, depending on where you sit, but is quite similar to DHCs.

Best landing ever had was on an ACA CRJ.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3864 times:

I have always preferred the ERJ - solely from a passenger perspective in that the cabin is narrower and therefore, the "A" side is always a single seat.

That said, I experienced my first CRJ700 ride yesterday on UA Express, DEN-BHM. I will be the first to admit an excellent ride, no engine noise, but plenty loud regardless, and UA has "F" class on some of these birds which is always nice.

One thing I did notice - seats in row 1 don't line up with the windows - at all. Sitting in 1A, there is a blank panel immediately aligned with the seat. In order to peer out I had lean forward - a lot. Not that it mattered yesterday since I was beat from the red-eye flight ANC-DEN the night before.

I'm still an ERJ type passenger, but there is definitely something to be said for the CRJ700!!!


User currently offlineTjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2453 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3739 times:

I'd rather fly on a SF-340 or an ATR than a CRJ-100/200. The pax windows were afterthought and the cabin is cramped and claustrophobic in the CRJ-100/200.

I'd take an ERJ-135/ -140/ -145 over a CRJ-100/200 any time.



Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
User currently offlineDrerx7 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5192 posts, RR: 8
Reply 17, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3716 times:

I absolutely hate CRJ-100/200s they are the most uncomfortable planes I've ever been on. The ERJ145/135/XRs are far superior aircraft in terms of passenger comfort. Apparently the other models of the CRJ (save for the -900) are much better-I'll have to take their word for it. ERJs for me only.


Third Coast born, means I'm Texas raised
User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 13161 posts, RR: 100
Reply 18, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3708 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 4):
The CRJ is a little heavier, yet it burns a little less fuel than the ERJ.

??? I work with an ex-Allison engineer who is very proud that the ERJ-145, in back to back testing for CO, burned less fuel than the CRJ-200. Recall that CO made the two manufacturers do a "fly off" for their contract.

I do seem to be the sole a.nutter who likes the CRJ-900. Alas, I haven't tried the E-jets, but my non-enthusiast friends who have love it! Sigh, I understand why the east coast is a more ideal market for the E-jets... But I still wish for more of them out west.

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8292 posts, RR: 23
Reply 19, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3708 times:

ERJ-145 versus CRJ-200, ERJ wins hands down for pax comfort. You're not all crammed in with a midget window, for one. ERJ windows are huge. CRJ-700 versus ERJ... CR7 probably wins on longer flights. As for underwing, I've only ever worked CRJs and I love those bins... especially compared to a mad dog!


This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineCruzinAltitude From United States of America, joined May 2004, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3679 times:

Here is my $.02. . .

Having only flown in a CRJ 700 I cannot compare ride quality, noise, or comfort.

However, having a pair of eyes and subjective opinion I have to say that the CRJ's are far better looking. As Supa7E7 said, winglets, shiny engine cowlings, and sleek flight deck windows gets me every time. In fact, I think the CRJ is the best looking twin engine T-tail design ever flow.


User currently offlinePrimetimeDC9 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 67 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3678 times:

I have to go with ERJ as well, I hate having to bend over to look out the window on the CRJ, I always end up with a sore neck. In addition to the window, I don't like how the fuselage of the CRJ curves around to cramp the floor space of the plane. ERJ, is longer too, I like the stretch vs. the cramped width.

User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21534 posts, RR: 59
Reply 22, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 3660 times:

I prefer the B seat on the ERJ, as it has the most shoulder and foot room and you can put your bag under the seat.

I've only been on the CRJ once, in the B seat, and found it very, very cramped. ERJ seat width feels wider.

And for those who think the ERJ is longer inside than the CRJ (of same capacity), well, duh on that one. The ERJ cabin is 33% longer being a 1-2 vs. a 2-2 aircraft (not counting galley, lav space).



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlinePopfly From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 39 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks ago) and read 3576 times:

I had an occasion this year to make a trip where I flew on the ERJ outbound and the CRJ inbound. Since I had never been on either, I was looking forward to the experience and to making a direct comparison.

Impressions:

1. The looks of the airplanes are very subjective, but in my opinion the ERJ is very, very sexy with the long slender fuselage and aggressive looking wide-stance landing gear. The ERJ looks cool. The CRJ is short and squat with a narrow low main gear, and reminds me of a penguin. Its nose is shaped like a bullet, but I like the cockpit windows; reminds me of the Mosquito.
2. Both airplanes where very comfortable and I liked the seats in both. I did like the idea of getting a single aisle seat with a nice view in the ERJ.
3. The ride was excellent in both, better than I expected, but I'd have to give a small nod to the CRJ, which was totally smooth and stable throughout flight. There was a little lateral wobble on climbout from DFW in the ERJ but otherwise it was also superb. I was able to talk to the pilot after the ERJ flight and he told me that he had to be careful on the landing with runway alignment, because if he had to input too much bank that the aircraft would really sink, and he'd have to go around.
4. Cockpits: I LOVE the ERJ cockpit, especially the rams horn yoke.

Overall I was hugely impressed with both airplanes, and I would have to say I preferred flying as a passenger in both to any of the larger jetliners (737 and larger) except for first class seating.


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21534 posts, RR: 59
Reply 24, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks ago) and read 3551 times:

I've also noticed the ERJ wobble, and of course, the ERJs turn into ovens sitting on the ground during pax loading and unloading in hot climates, as the AC is not adequate.  Sad


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
25 SuperD : If the ERJ is hot on the ground, it's most likely because there was no ground air at the airport and the pilots waited until the passengers started b
26 KAUSpilot : The older ERJ's are pitifully weight restricted. The old 145ER's (now EP's) are typically weight restricted to 45 passengers. At least embraer fixed t
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Have You Flown On An ERJ/CRJ? posted Sat Oct 20 2001 04:31:08 by N17085
NW Newco Now 'Compass" CRJ-900 And ERJ-175 posted Tue Apr 4 2006 02:43:13 by AirRyan
CASM: CRJ Vs. ERJ posted Thu Jun 2 2005 00:36:01 by Jmc1975
Aeroflot Shopping For RJs: CRJ, ERJ, Tu338 posted Tue Jun 29 2004 16:23:34 by DIA
Your Favorites With CRJ/EMB/ERJ? posted Sun Mar 7 2004 20:57:57 by ScottysAir
CRJ/ERJ Why Both? posted Mon Mar 1 2004 07:56:25 by KBUF737
AC//ERJ's & CRJ's Cheque Is In The Mail posted Fri Feb 20 2004 00:56:19 by FLYACYYZ
I Thought CRJ/ERJ's Etc Cost Less To Operate? posted Thu Feb 19 2004 00:48:12 by Alexinwa
Dislike For CRJ Or ERJ? posted Sat Oct 25 2003 21:51:48 by Qantasguy
CRJ/ERJ/ATR ... Gates. posted Thu Oct 2 2003 00:09:07 by BAJMowiec