HikesWithEyes From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 816 posts, RR: 8 Posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1084 times:
Hope this doesn't require registration. If it does, then you can
always access bugmenot.com.
Wedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5531 posts, RR: 5 Reply 1, posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1070 times:
This development could be good news for other airports like Renton and Auburn.
DCrawley From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 371 posts, RR: 1 Reply 2, posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1067 times:
I have no problem with WN screwing the POS.. but GA? I don't agree with that. A lot of my friends fly out of their, both privately and commercially. If it effects GA that much I hope they aren't allowed in.. just my opinion though.
-d
[Edited 2005-10-11 03:14:38]
"Weather at our destination is 50 degrees with some broken clouds, but they'll try to have them fixed before we arrive."
KC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 11711 posts, RR: 52 Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1046 times:
The only change there will be at Boeing Field is no simotainious runway operations. The GA aircraft will have to maintane a 3 mile seperation from any commerical aircraft, just like anywhere else in the US.
This is just BS being put out by someone. The POS, perhaps?
AA54Heavy From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 189 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1022 times:
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 3): The GA aircraft will have to maintane a 3 mile seperation from any commerical aircraft, just like anywhere else in the US.
Wait, so in the US GA aircraft have to always maintain a 3 mile separation from any commercial aircraft??? Is this supposed to be everywhere, or just where you have runways so closed together...
I ask because yesterday I was doing touch and go's at TUS and 737s. MD-80s, etc. were significantly closer to me than 3 miles....say up to 400 ft or so.....perhaps we're talking about two different things....
Wedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5531 posts, RR: 5 Reply 5, posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 986 times:
Wouldn't BFI's setup be any different than what it's like at SJC? There's plenty of GA traffic and Commercial traffic at SJC...always has.
KC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 11711 posts, RR: 52 Reply 6, posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 984 times:
Quoting AA54Heavy (Reply 4): Wait, so in the US GA aircraft have to always maintain a 3 mile separation from any commercial aircraft??? Is this supposed to be everywhere, or just where you have runways so closed together...
I ask because yesterday I was doing touch and go's at TUS and 737s. MD-80s, etc. were significantly closer to me than 3 miles....say up to 400 ft or so.....perhaps we're talking about two different things....
3 miles is the standard seperation. Going into TUS, were the aircraft AA going intothe maintenance hangers?
You also can have one airplane landing and one departing at the same time on two different runways.
AA54Heavy From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 189 posts, RR: 0 Reply 7, posted (7 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 916 times:
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 6): 3 miles is the standard seperation. Going into TUS, were the aircraft AA going intothe maintenance hangers?
You also can have one airplane landing and one departing at the same time on two different runways.
I think you're talking about TUL, and not TUS, negative on the AA hangars here...but the MD-80s and 737s were American, Delta, SWA, etc. doing their regularly scheduled jaunts.....however, it makes sense with the simulatneous arrivals on parallel runways...
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 816 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
