Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
C-5 To Be Used By Airlines As Passenger Plane  
User currently offlineDeltaATL From United States of America, joined Mar 2014, 13 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3615 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was just wondering...

Why don't they use some of those military jets in the airlines?

The C-5 is huge! Imagine it in Delta colors!  hehe




You gotta admit... that would be kinda cool!

maybe even the C-17 or C-130???

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTSV From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1641 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3347 times:

Well it's been done in model form. Entex boxed the Otaki 1:144 C-5 Galaxy as a "Lockheed L-500 World's Largest Airliner" with Pan-Am, TWA, and JAL markings!


"I told you I was ill ..." Spike Milligan
User currently offlineFlygga From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3332 times:

You want a Delta C-130....well here you go


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © AirNikon



User currently offlineFlygga From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3324 times:

And if you want a passenger version of the C130 here you go


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © F.J. Wang Ying Lung



Check out the added passenger windows


User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5290 posts, RR: 62
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3323 times:

Boeing were planing to build a C-17 look-alike! It was designated the Model 763-241, with a high wing, four underslung turbofans and an enormous T-tail, 20.1m to 21.3m high depending on configuration. The aircraft's span was 80m and length overall was 76.25m.



Jeremiah Teahan



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineCtbarnes From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3491 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3312 times:

If memory serves, Boeing's entrant into the competition to build the C-5 back in the 60's is what eventually became the design for the 747. And the rest, as they say, is history.

Charles



The customer isn't a moron, she is your wife -David Ogilvy
User currently offlineRyaneverest From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3300 times:

If that C-5 thing is gonna be converted to passenger, then is it gonna be double deck from nose to tail?
Then it'll look like a T-tail A3XX! 


User currently offlineRobin27 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3295 times:

Only double deck?

User currently offlineBigGiraffe From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3274 times:

The C-5 was offered to commercial carriers, about 30 years ago, as the L-500. There were no takers for a variety of reasons. As a passenger aircraft, it is 100 kts slower than a 747 or 707. As a freighter, it would not make use of the standard equipment the airlines already had. And, the cost was very high. But Entex did make that model with TWA and Pan Am colors.

User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3275 times:

Actually, a C-5 is smaller than a 747-400 by weight... but imagine an An-225 airliner!

User currently offlineSamurai 777 From Canada, joined Jan 2000, 2458 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3263 times:

The T-tailed and high-wing version of the Boeing 747 was indeed one of the first designs considered for the 747, but was quickly rejected by a lot of airlines, not only because of the slower speed and high costs, but for a number of other reasons. The location of the wings and engines being higher off the ground would make it more difficult for ground and maintenance crews to work on them, including refueling work. Also, many airlines said it looked too "military", as I remember having read that in a book about the history of the Boeing 747.

User currently offlineJumbofan From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 17 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3226 times:

With a 35% Reliability I don't think any airline could use a C5 and make a Profit. Air force has enough problems keeping them Flying. 

User currently offlineDL_Mech From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1908 posts, RR: 9
Reply 12, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3226 times:

Where would the cargo go in the L-500? Aft rear fuselage?


This plane is built to withstand anything... except a bad pilot.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Concorde To Be Used By Military? posted Sat Jan 10 2004 20:32:48 by Thrust
747 To Be Used As A Home In LA posted Fri Jan 13 2006 06:48:17 by Geoffthomas
BAe 146 To Be Used As Fire Bomber posted Thu Sep 16 2004 00:47:24 by Qqflyboy
N754PR To Be Used As A Combi. posted Wed Jan 7 2004 10:45:28 by N754pr
Canada West Airlines To Be Started By C3 Pilots! posted Wed Feb 6 2002 15:52:53 by AirCanadaMan
ACC-DUS To Be Launched By Antrak posted Mon Nov 13 2006 09:59:23 by Soups
777-LR To Be Lightened By 7 Tons posted Mon Jul 17 2006 17:22:51 by Ultrapig
MEA To Be Privatized By 2008 posted Thu Mar 16 2006 05:04:31 by BA
DFW To Be Affected By Major Road Reconstruction? posted Sat Feb 25 2006 19:35:17 by OPNLguy
CHC Extensions To Be Completed By 2009 posted Thu Jan 5 2006 09:27:42 by Airnz777pilot