Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Tri-engine Aircrafts  
User currently offlineDELTA FLYER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (17 years 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 932 times:

Hi :

I personally experienced that the three-engined aircrafts climb and fly better than all the other aircrafts. In other words, the DC-10 and MD-11 are more powerful than B767-300ER and B-777 when taking off. Although they consume more fuel than the others, they give a better performance ...

What do you guys think ...


2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8657 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (17 years 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 932 times:

a tri-jet is less powerful and has a lesser max climb performance than a twin. To be certified for operation, a new plane must be able to climb with one engine out. So a 757 must be able to climb with half of it's power lost, whereas an MD11, TriStar or 727 must be able to climb with only a third of it's power lost (not sure of exact rule on 4 engine designs). You can see that the power in reserve on a twin is correspondingly higher, and a twin would be able to outclimb any trijet, let alone any 4-engine design. This is why in some circles (the author included), twins are safer than 3- and 4-engine designs because most accidents occur on take-off and landing, virtually never over the ocean. The greater power-to-weight ratio in a twin gives an extra margin of power when it may be most needed.

fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineJETPILOT From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3130 posts, RR: 27
Reply 2, posted (17 years 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 932 times:

You can't possibly evaluate the performance of the aircraft you were on. You don't know the factors involved to determine performance. What was the density altitude, the weight of the aircraft. Was it a max power takeoff or a reduced power takeoff. Was there a climb gradient to be met. Were noise abatment procedures in effect. These factors change with every aircraft form flight to flight. The performance of the jet is impossible to estimate from a passenger who know none of the variables.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Jetstar A330 Engine Fuel Starvation Report posted Wed Jun 17 2009 00:10:33 by Jetfuel
Question On Engine Cowling/shell posted Sun Jun 14 2009 20:58:43 by Richiemo
Twin-engine Accident 'bound To Happen'? posted Tue Jun 2 2009 06:32:41 by Part147
Is This Engine Damage Possible Inflight? posted Fri May 15 2009 05:15:00 by Trent1000
Four-Engine Bird In CMH Today? posted Fri May 1 2009 09:32:44 by FlyDeltaJets87
Has Delta's 767s Always Had 1+ Engine Type? posted Mon Apr 6 2009 17:21:30 by LASOctoberB6
UA923 Diverts To Maine -- Engine Failure.Smoke posted Wed Apr 1 2009 16:52:37 by PlateMan
Air Namibia SW286 Again Back To FRA (engine Prob.) posted Mon Mar 30 2009 01:44:37 by AlexA340B777
Manaus: An Engine Falls On The City posted Thu Mar 26 2009 06:45:39 by Maperrin
So What Caused The Hole In The Engine? posted Wed Mar 25 2009 14:05:20 by Toering