Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
EK 345's Routes  
User currently offlineA360 From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 434 posts, RR: 8
Posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3400 times:

Now that EK has received all of their 10 A340-500's, they can't say they don't have the planes to fly ultra long haul.

I mean... they still say they lack planes, which mean than they have to use the 345's in average routes... so they have to receive more 77W's and maybe even some 346HGW's to be able to "free" the 345's from the medium/long haul routes to the planed ultra long haul flights to west coast USA and south america.

But for now, what are the 10 EK 345's doing?
Does anyone has a schedulle for this planes or something?

I know that they fly to JFK, ZRH, SYD and MEL I think... how many are used in these routes? Not all of them for sure...


Regards:

A360

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlinePlanemanofnz From New Zealand, joined Sep 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3317 times:

You are forgetting that they fly from Sydney to Christchurch and Melbourne to Auckland and they will be flying them to Perth this season too I believe. Also, don't they fly them to KIX?

User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5344 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 3193 times:

Seems from the Northern Winter schedules starting October 30th they will fly.

DXB-JFK 2x daily 4 aircraft
DXB-MEL-AKL daily 2 aircraft
DXB-SYD-CHC daily 2 aircraft
DXB-KIX daily 1 aircraft
DXB-ZRH 5x weekly 1 aircraft

So it seems that all these aircraft are used, although I think on all those routes they could use the 773ER. I guess once they have more aircraft like 773ER and the A380's start arriving they will free up A345's to open up ULH routes to US West coast and South America.

Quoting Planemanofnz (Reply 1):
and they will be flying them to Perth this season too I believe.

The second PER flight was scheduled as a 345 but has been delayed, I believe due to a lack of aircraft, or was it even that they have used all there current landing rights in Australia?


User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6926 posts, RR: 63
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3059 times:

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 2):
DXB-ZRH 5x weekly 1 aircraft

I've seen them at ZRH (and they look great) but I've never understood why they need such a capable plane on what is not a long flight. Anyone know?


User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3329 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 3032 times:

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 2):
or was it even that they have used all there current landing rights in Australia?

Nope, EK have the rights to operate 49pw to Australia. They still have 7 freq remaining, and can choose to operate to either PER or BNE.

at the moment....
SYD 14pw
MEL 14pw
PER 7pw
BNE 7pw

SYD and MEL are capped at 14pw at the moment.

EK will overcome this by putting on the A380, as the BASA does not stipulate capacity limits, just frequency.


User currently offlineA350 From Germany, joined Nov 2004, 1100 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2972 times:

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 2):
DXB-JFK 2x daily 4 aircraft
DXB-MEL-AKL daily 2 aircraft
DXB-SYD-CHC daily 2 aircraft
DXB-KIX daily 1 aircraft
DXB-ZRH 5x weekly 1 aircraft



Quoting PM (Reply 3):
I've seen them at ZRH (and they look great) but I've never understood why they need such a capable plane on what is not a long flight. Anyone know?

I always wondered the same, but this thread gave me an idea: They have 10 A345s now, and they are all in use, no backup a/c for mx or unforeseen events. Maybe the plane to ZRH IS the backup and can be replaced by a 772ER or a A343 if necessary. Any thoughts?

A350



Photography - the art of observing, not the art of arranging
User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6926 posts, RR: 63
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2940 times:

Quoting A350 (Reply 5):
Any thoughts?

Could well be. It would make sense since they really don't need an A345 on this route. But if they do have a spare 777 that could do the route, why not use it all the time and keep the A345 back? Are they still training up crews and need to utilise these planes as much as possible? Whatever, the reason, I hope they don't pull them off the ZRH route before I have a chance to fly on one!


User currently offlineEmirates773ER From Pakistan, joined Jun 2005, 1450 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2863 times:

Well they are talking of services to canada sometime next year and most probably they are direct which means that a A340-500 will be used, where are they planning to get that from?


The Truth is Out There ---- Face It!!!!!
User currently offlineA360 From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 434 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 2778 times:

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 2):
Seems from the Northern Winter schedules starting October 30th they will fly.

DXB-JFK 2x daily 4 aircraft
DXB-MEL-AKL daily 2 aircraft
DXB-SYD-CHC daily 2 aircraft
DXB-KIX daily 1 aircraft
DXB-ZRH 5x weekly 1 aircraft

Thanks for the info!  Smile

As for the ZRH "mistery", I've read a thread in here, a while ago, that said EK was using the 345 to ZRH because some swiss company had reserved 1st class seats for a long period of time on the 345's.

That company should need frequent flights to DXB, and instead of sending a private jet they would send their people on the 345's first class which is superb!

And that would be he reason why EK operates he 345's to ZRH(because no other aircrafts have that fantastic 1st class).

Don't know if this is true though...


User currently offlineKaran69 From India, joined Oct 2004, 2891 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 2721 times:

Quoting A360 (Reply 8):
As for the ZRH "mistery", I've read a thread in here, a while ago, that said EK was using the 345 to ZRH because some swiss company had reserved 1st class seats for a long period of time on the 345's.

That company should need frequent flights to DXB, and instead of sending a private jet they would send their people on the 345's first class which is superb!

And that would be he reason why EK operates he 345's to ZRH(because no other aircrafts have that fantastic 1st class).

Don't know if this is true though...

That is the TRUTH


User currently offlineCayMan From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 905 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 2693 times:

There are unconfirmed reports that they will launch 3x weekly DXb YYZ service in the 345s, and maybe daily after that. Word has been for a long time they want daily to YYZ but perhaps they are willing to settle for 3x week for now.

User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 13
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2581 times:

I was wondering if the second daily flight to JFK would be flown by the B777-300ER? Emirates stated the delay in starting their second daily to JFK was because of the delays at Boeing in receiving more B777-300ERs. Of course this could also mean that they need to keep that second A340-500 on one of those SYD flights until more B777-300ERs arrive.


No Vueling No Party
User currently offlineKtachiya From Japan, joined Sep 2004, 1794 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2559 times:

Quoting Planemanofnz (Reply 1):
Also, don't they fly them to KIX?

Yes, I flew out of there this June. When we were departing KIX, I saw an EK345 parked at the spot and when I came back to Japan from Australia. I saw an EK A332 parked at the gate. Strange........

BTW, why does EK have that super long ground time in KIX? Is there a reason to that? Crew Rest?



Flown on: DC-10-30, B747-200B, B747-300, B747-300SR, B747-400, B747-400D, B767-300, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-300
User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3329 posts, RR: 20
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2530 times:

Quoting Ktachiya (Reply 12):
BTW, why does EK have that super long ground time in KIX? Is there a reason to that? Crew Rest?

Nope... connections to/from Europe and north africa...

flights from Europe to DXB arrive between 23.00 and 01.30 and connect with:
2:50a DXB 1 4:40p KIX EK 316 Non-stop 345 8:50

11:15p KIX 5:55a+1 DXB 1 EK 317 Non-stop 345 11:40
this connects with flights departing dxb for europe between 07.00 and 09.30.

ps. 6 hrs ground time is nothing! EK has ground time of 18 hrs in MEL to ensure connectivity...

2:45a DXB 1 1:15a+1 MEL 2 EK 404 1-Stop 773 15:30
8:30p MEL 2 5:45a+1 DXB 1 EK 405 1-Stop 773 16:15

Note similar arrival/departure time to KIX service


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5344 posts, RR: 11
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2443 times:

Quoting AlitaliaMD11 (Reply 11):
I was wondering if the second daily flight to JFK would be flown by the B777-300ER?

No it will be an A345 service! They need more 773ER's for other routes, not entirerly sure where yet, but they are getting 30 of them so I guess we can expect more new route announcements soon.

Wonder if DXB-AKL non stop is still in the plans? This would be an A345 route.


User currently offlinePurpleBox From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 325 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks ago) and read 2372 times:

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 14):
Wonder if DXB-AKL non stop is still in the plans? This would be an A345 route.

This sector is 8824mi (or 7668nm) - is this possible for the A345?

PurpleBox.



Next Flights:STH-ATH-STN (A3), BHX-INV-BHX(BE), LCY-FRA-BOG(LH), EZE-FRA-LHR(LH)
User currently offlineBoeingFever777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 409 posts, RR: 53
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks ago) and read 2363 times:

Why don't you try a search on there website???

They also fly to ZRH now.

http://www.emirates.com/a340/range.asp?menuSelect=6



[Edited 2005-10-18 08:18:32]


Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre.
User currently offlineYOWza From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 4897 posts, RR: 15
Reply 17, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks ago) and read 2358 times:

Appraently the UAE-Canada bilateral has been modified to allow both Etihad and EK into YYZ and in return AC to DXB and F5F on to Pakistan.

YOWza



12A whenever possible.
User currently offlineEmirates777 From Tanzania, joined Feb 2000, 655 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2278 times:

The B777-300ER will most likely take over one of the JFK daily flights from Summer 2006 onwards, thereby freeing up 2x A345. My sense is that these aircraft will be used to start South America flights and/or Canadian services. Additional A345s may get freed up enabling improvement of frequencies as Emirates deploy the B77W on the non-stop Australia services.

YOWza
Thanks for the heads up on the amendment to the UAE-Canada bilateral. Have they by any chance increased the entitlements for the carriers - or at least a provision to allow them to increase their frequencies ? I would assume each carrier is allowed 3x weekly flights ?

Rgds
Emirates777


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5344 posts, RR: 11
Reply 19, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2274 times:

While you are about Emirates777. Any news on the expansion of Australia and NZ flights? Other than what you said about 77W's maybe on the non stop SYD and MEL services.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Reply 20, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2207 times:

Speaking of EK, I wonder has the airline seriously looked at buying the 777-200LR? Given the plane's commonality with the 777-300ER's EK ordered, it would allow the airline to fly more really long routes in the future (I can see EK fly DXB-LAX using the 772LR).

User currently offlineA360 From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 434 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2106 times:

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 20):
Speaking of EK, I wonder has the airline seriously looked at buying the 777-200LR? Given the plane's commonality with the 777-300ER's EK ordered, it would allow the airline to fly more really long routes in the future (I can see EK fly DXB-LAX using the 772LR).

DXB-LAX will happen... sooner or later... but they already have the 345's to do it.  Wink

There's virtually no route(realistic route at least) out of the 345's range from DXB.... so they don't need the 772LR for the range alone... but the may/will probably buy it, to have more ULR aircrafts.

PS: MEX-DXB probably wouldn't be possible, because of MEX being hot and high. Don't know if a 772LR could do it either...


User currently offlineKiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8572 posts, RR: 13
Reply 22, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2099 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PurpleBox (Reply 15):
Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 14):
Wonder if DXB-AKL non stop is still in the plans? This would be an A345 route.

This sector is 8824mi (or 7668nm) - is this possible for the A345?

Can't see it - SQ does SIN-EWR at 8285 nm - so technically it is feasible - but the yield on SIN-EWR is ( I would imagine largely in USD ) a helluva lot better than that on DXB-AKL ( in South Pacific Pesos ...ooops , I mean NZD)

Also EK's AKL and CHC flights are more a means of getting the a/c off the aprons in SYD/MEL/BNE thus avoiding hefty charges than of earning revenue in their own right . EK have talked a lot about DXB-AKL nonstop happening eventually - but I am not holding my breath waiting



Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2192 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2074 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 6thfreedom (Reply 13):
flights from Europe to DXB arrive between 23.00 and 01.30 and connect with:
2:50a DXB 1 4:40p KIX EK 316 Non-stop 345 8:50

11:15p KIX 5:55a+1 DXB 1 EK 317 Non-stop 345 11:40
this connects with flights departing dxb for europe between 07.00 and 09.30.

How come the westbound trip takes nearly 3 hours longer than the eastbound? Are headwinds that strong across Asia?

I have flown Asia-Europe many times, and the westbound sectors took about one hour more than the eastbound ones...



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineYOWza From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 4897 posts, RR: 15
Reply 24, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2057 times:

Quoting Emirates777 (Reply 18):
Thanks for the heads up on the amendment to the UAE-Canada bilateral. Have they by any chance increased the entitlements for the carriers - or at least a provision to allow them to increase their frequencies ? I would assume each carrier is allowed 3x weekly flights ?

You're spot on with the 3x weekly. The small problem is that AC are pushing for 5th freedom right to other Middle East destinations ex DXB and that is proving sticky. Further to this problem for AC is that their 340s are already working very hard on other important routes, so we'll have to wait and see.

YoWza



12A whenever possible.
User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5344 posts, RR: 11
Reply 25, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1995 times:

Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 22):
Also EK's AKL and CHC flights are more a means of getting the a/c off the aprons in SYD/MEL/BNE thus avoiding hefty charges than of earning revenue in their own right . EK have talked a lot about DXB-AKL nonstop happening eventually - but I am not holding my breath waiting

Not to mention freight! I am surprised we have never seen an EK 744F in AKL.

DXB-AKL gives a 1 stop to Europe and EK are becoming more known in NZ, there was talk of an AKL-SIN-DXB service aswell.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
EK 345 Payload Restricted Out Of DXB? posted Thu Jan 19 2006 18:32:03 by MaverickM11
EK New Routes And Addnl Frequencies posted Sat Dec 17 2005 15:36:36 by Zaphod
EK 345 Stopover At SIN? posted Mon May 30 2005 16:48:55 by Ronerone
Hollywood Likes EK A 345 F Class posted Tue Dec 21 2004 06:48:36 by Behramjee
EK 345 To LGW - When? posted Mon Dec 8 2003 22:01:11 by Dan330
1st A380 EK Routes : India And Pakistan. posted Wed Sep 20 2006 18:02:34 by FCKC
EK's Lowest Yielding Routes posted Mon May 1 2006 00:29:08 by TwoLz2Rn
Routes Flown By EK's A340-300 posted Sat Nov 26 2005 18:15:14 by LY777
Why Flies EK With A 345 To Zurich? posted Sun Mar 27 2005 22:42:01 by ZRH
EK Routes Down Under posted Mon Oct 18 2004 15:59:55 by Asianguy767