Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Stretched A330-600?  
User currently offlineAirCanada014 From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 1513 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2688 times:

Hello all

What do you think of Airbus stretching their A330-300 and have a new powerful engines like Boeing did with their 772 to 773? So the length would be
247 feet with wingspan of 211ft, engines would produce 94,000 lbs of thrust, height at 60ft with a range of 7300nm. I know they will have to do some adjustments like they did with A340-600. Any comments. I know its not going to happen but can you imagine Airbus stretched their A330. New cabin designs and many more new features to offer. Its your imagination.

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStartknob From Germany, joined May 2004, 156 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2645 times:

A 330-600 - a nice idea - but I've got some factors against:

(a) why spend money for a internal competition. When somebody wants a near 747-pax Airbus today there's already the a 340-600.
(b) why invest into a new wing for the A 330 when you just develop the A350?

So, the idea is really nice, but perhaps a "A350-600" - a streeeeeeeeched future version of the A 350 with the bold engines and the wing that can carry the load would have a bigger chance of coming true.
What do you think?

Regards,
Kojak



When playing cat and mice it's imperative to know, who's the cat.
User currently offlineAirCanada014 From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 1513 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2599 times:

Yeah I was thinking about that too. But I thought since it would be a two engine instead of 4 engine so airliners can choose what they want. Also maintenance will be a saving since it will have two engines vs four.

User currently offlineA350 From Germany, joined Nov 2004, 1100 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2541 times:

Then Airbus stretched the A340 they had the choice to stretch the A330 instead but they didn't. All those saying the A340 is so bad because it's a quad should think about that  Wink

But yes, I too think that a future A350 stretch is possible.

A350



Photography - the art of observing, not the art of arranging
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 960 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2491 times:

Quoting A350 (Reply 3):
Then Airbus stretched the A340 they had the choice to stretch the A330 instead but they didn't. All those saying the A340 is so bad because it's a quad should think about that

Huh?

There was no choice to make. There is (and was) no way to fit 777-sized engines onto the A330 wing. A compromised and less-than-optimal quad configuration on the A340 was necessary.

Quoting A350 (Reply 3):
But yes, I too think that a future A350 stretch is possible.

Airbus may carry aspects of A350 production to the A345/A346, but it's doubtful that Airbus will stretch the A359. The A359 still doesn't have a wing with the uplift capability suitable for a stretch with sufficent range/payload.


User currently offlineA350 From Germany, joined Nov 2004, 1100 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2462 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 4):
There was no choice to make. There is (and was) no way to fit 777-sized engines onto the A330 wing. A compromised and less-than-optimal quad configuration on the A340 was necessary.

And what is going to happen at the A350  confused 
Fan diameter of the Trent 700 is 97.4in, at the Trent 800 110in. A difference, of course, but not overwhelming. RR proposed a stronger Trent 800 for the 777NG. This engine would have been available for the A330-600, too. And, yes, I know that the GE90 engine has a bigger fan.

A350



Photography - the art of observing, not the art of arranging
User currently offlineA360 From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 434 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2326 times:

I think that a 350-1000 would be as possible as a B787-10.

And everybody is convinced that the 787-10 will be a reality... I believe it can be feasible too.
As a possible 350-1000 would be too. (the wing of the 350 is bigger than the 787 wing, if i'm not mistaken)


User currently offlineAstuteman From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 9976 posts, RR: 96
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2174 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 4):
The A359 still doesn't have a wing with the uplift capability suitable for a stretch with sufficent range/payload.

My understanding from Airbus statements was that the A350 is being designed with the capability to grow to 275t.........


User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2113 times:

Quoting A360 (Reply 6):
I think that a 350-1000 would be as possible as a B787-10.

The challenge is keeping such a long and small diameter fuselage stiff. In the case of the A340-500 and A340-600 a lot of structural weight was added to achieve the required stiffness. It would seem that the A350 would need the same.

The B787 has two advantages in this regard. First the fuselage is 13 inches greater in height, which helps a lot to maintain stiffness. Second, the composite fuselage is inherently extremely stiff anyway. It may be that a B787-10 needs just 0 or in some places 1 more layer to maintain the structural rigidity of the B787-9. The advantage of using a composite fuselage is increases as the length/diameter aspect ratio increases.


User currently offlineMolykote From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 1340 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2021 times:

Ground clearance at engine lowest point for an A330-300 with 100" Pratts (4168A)

- Power plant 0.730 m (2.39 ft.)



Speedtape - The asprin of aviation!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A330-600, Hmmm... posted Sun Jun 12 2005 20:41:03 by VANGUARD737
Could Airbus Build An A330-600? posted Mon Jul 5 2004 00:52:32 by EnoreFilho
A330-500 / A330-600? posted Wed May 29 2002 08:45:08 by LUFC
Stretched A330/A340 posted Mon Aug 21 2000 18:39:14 by Rw
A330-600 Super Stretch Twin posted Wed Feb 17 1999 02:23:12 by B767-400ER
A330 Family Sales Reaches 600 Units posted Sat Nov 25 2006 07:16:14 by Leelaw
The A300-600 Vs. A330-200 posted Tue Apr 27 2004 21:30:19 by Cancidas
A330 With A340-500/600 Wings. Possible? posted Mon May 19 2003 19:22:20 by Citation X
A330-100: Child Of A330 And A300-600 posted Tue Jan 25 2000 18:33:05 by GoA340
A330, A340-500/600 Questions? posted Tue Nov 30 1999 09:28:12 by Jr