Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
China Airlines Accident Questions  
User currently offlineMarshalN From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2005, 1521 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2380 times:

Hi all, just wondering if people know more about these


Especially the 05/25/2002 and the 02/16/1998 ones...

For the 2002 one -- how did they know the crack existed? If it was on the plane already during maintenance, why did nobody fix it?

And for the 1998 one... what on earth was the pilot doing climbing at 35 degrees pitch??

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 5554 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (10 years 7 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2314 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MarshalN (Thread starter):
For the 2002 one -- how did they know the crack existed? If it was on the plane already during maintenance, why did nobody fix it?

There are numerous photos of the area in question on the plane where stains can be seen leading from the repaired area's doubler plate (put on to repair a tail strike early in its career). One way such stains could have been produced would have been by something leaking out from inside! At the time these photos were done as part of a structural assessment, no one seemed to question why these stains existed or it was simply put down to some unusual slipsteam effect from the doubler plate!
The other issue is what type of repair was done on the plane after its tail strike. Apparently the Taiwan CAA at the time of the initial accident did not require that details of the exact procedure for the repair be kept for more than a certain time period. As a result, after the crash, all CAL had was records that the repair was done and when but not specifics as to how it was done. All those who were involved in doing the repair had all died/retired etc. Supposedly Boeing says it has no record of being asked how the repair should have been done at the time of the definitive repair. They know for sure they were asked about an initial repair to allow the plane to fly back to TPE . Even if the definitive repair was carried out "properly" at the time, Boeing apparently did subsequently amend its procedures for such several years later. There was a question of whether CAL knew about these new procedures, and if they had been informed, were they then obligated to repair the repair so to speak. Not that the fact that Boeing having been involved guarantees anything as the botched Boeing repair on the JL 747 which crashed in 85 showed!

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Another One! China Airlines Accident,737-800 Today posted Tue May 28 2002 19:54:27 by Bobcat
Could The China Airlines Accident Be Worse If... posted Mon Aug 23 1999 09:48:43 by Pandora
China Airlines Launch New Uniform posted Mon Dec 4 2006 21:29:14 by Jimyvr
China Airlines To Place Long-haul Order In 07H1 posted Fri Nov 24 2006 22:16:01 by Jimyvr
China Airlines 330 To Australia From January 2007 posted Tue Nov 21 2006 07:00:49 by Jimyvr
China Airlines IAH-SEA-TPE 17NOV posted Thu Nov 16 2006 21:38:03 by MaverickM11
China Airlines Launch Stockholm Freighter Service posted Sat Nov 11 2006 21:45:34 by Jimyvr
China Airlines 744 posted Sat Oct 28 2006 18:04:27 by Slovacek747
Why China Airlines 744 With Boeing Colors? posted Wed Sep 6 2006 19:38:14 by RedFlyer
China Airlines 747 Rumor posted Thu Aug 24 2006 07:35:07 by 777MechSys