Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SAS To Reopen Stations, Taken Over By LH, In 2006?  
User currently offlineGodBless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2752 posts, RR: 16
Posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4831 times:

I once heard that SK wasn't too pleased with the fact that LH took over all their stations in Germany but that they by contract would have to live with that until 2006.
Is it known already what SAS will do after the end of it? Will we see them open up their own [old] stations again?
Will Lufthansa also go independent again in the SK-countries?

Thank you in advance,

Max

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHS748 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 4755 times:

Why would they want to? Surely one of the benefits of being in an alliance is that you don't have to have the expense of using your own staff at every station.

User currently offlineSULUK From Switzerland, joined Jul 2005, 115 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 4583 times:

I am pretty sure that this will not happen. SAS can save a lot of money by not having own staff at stations/sales offices etc. AFAIK we have only two people working in FRA doing mainly sales. However, the quality would of course be better by having own staff... But unfortunately, as far as stations are concerned, SAS is trying to get rid of as many staff as possible. It was just announced a few days ago that all ATOs (HZ offices) in Sweden at smaller domestic stations will be closed mid November... How bad! And even international stations (where we still have own station staff) are not safe to servive. It's just so much cheaper to have LH done all this stuff...  Sad


we are swissair /+/
User currently offlineB727230 From Sweden, joined Aug 2005, 62 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4325 times:

Quoting GodBless (Thread starter):
once heard that SK wasn't too pleased with the fact that LH took over all their stations in Germany but that they by contract would have to live with that until 2006.

Don't know about this but I do know that Lufthansa is not very satisfied with SAS' service reductions on board and on the ground, especially on routes which are operated under codeshare agreement between Scandinavia and Germany. According to agreement (or so I've heard), service levels and benefits should be equal between SAS and LH on those routes which they no longer are. This is one of the reasons SAS haven't been able to introduce the new lower 650 SEK oneway fares to Germany yet (except to Hamburg and Berlin, thanks to "negotiations going better than expected").



Wieder in die Sonne fliegen
User currently offlineCityjet From Germany, joined Sep 2005, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4287 times:

Actually LH should look closely at SK economy concept.
I don't see the point with LH why one is forced to pay over 1000EUR for a mid week two day trip in Europe while getting the same service standard as someone who paid 149EUR.
While SAS their Economy Flex option is good as you pay a higher fare, but get higher service with it. Win Win for the airline and customer.


User currently offlineMika From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 2881 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4214 times:

Quoting B727230 (Reply 3):
Don't know about this but I do know that Lufthansa is not very satisfied with SAS' service reductions on board and on the ground, especially on routes which are operated under codeshare agreement between Scandinavia and Germany. According to agreement (or so I've heard), service levels and benefits should be equal between SAS and LH on those routes which they no longer are. This is one of the reasons SAS haven't been able to introduce the new lower 650 SEK oneway fares to Germany yet (except

I completely agree with this. As of now SAS really is becoming a LCC with the exception that they dont always offer fares on a LCC level.


User currently offlineLufthansa747 From Philippines, joined May 1999, 3201 posts, RR: 43
Reply 6, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4113 times:

Quoting SULUK (Reply 2):
I am pretty sure that this will not happen. SAS can save a lot of money by not having own staff at stations/sales offices etc. AFAIK we have only two people working in FRA doing mainly sales. However, the quality would of course be better by having own staff...

Similarly, SK sales team (In Estonia I guess) is doing LH Finland sales, none of them have any clue about LH products let alone SEN/HON benefits. It's completely appalling really.



Air Asia Super Elite, Cebu Pacific Titanium
User currently offlineSULUK From Switzerland, joined Jul 2005, 115 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3654 times:

SAS is def not becoming a LCC. I just have the feeling they are doing the right thing - this is what flying (in Europe) will be like in the future. Paying for your food, oneway tickets, self CKIN, booking on the internet and overall simplified travel by air. Don't get me wrong, I wished flying and the airline business would be as it was 10 or 20 years ago... But we cannot change this anymore.
Here a few arguments why SAS is way away from being a LCC:
- FFP EuroBonus
- Star Alliance member
- IATA carrier (interline agreements)
- own station/sales staff worldwide
- own technical service
- network carrier
- codeshare agreements
- C/Y/M cabin
- e-services such as ETKT, TP, Internet CKIN etc.
- a real airline name showing the company's origin (Scandinavian Airlines)  Smile
- etc, etc, etc, the list would go on



we are swissair /+/
User currently offlineGodBless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2752 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (8 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3502 times:

I thought that there was something in the making that made it look as if SK and LH would do their own things at the respective other airlines home-countries, without ending the alliance.
But it for sure doesn't seem so then...

Max


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
S7 To Be Taken Over By Aeroflot? posted Fri Jul 14 2006 20:18:57 by Flying-Tiger
What Airport Has Been Taken Over By Air Rage? posted Sun Jun 26 2005 04:15:20 by Swisskloten
Dutchbird Has Been Taken Over By HollandExel posted Fri Oct 8 2004 12:30:49 by Sfilipowicz
Dutchbird Taken Over By Exel? posted Fri Oct 8 2004 09:12:28 by TW741
EUJet Taken Over By PlaneStation Group? posted Thu Sep 30 2004 18:13:35 by TW741
US Airlines Taken Over By European Airlines..... posted Wed Apr 21 2004 01:40:33 by Kl911
LH Will NOT Order Widebodies In 2006 posted Mon Dec 4 2006 09:37:28 by Gbfra
737NG Appears To Be Off To Strong Start In 2006 posted Fri Apr 7 2006 00:41:00 by AviationAddict
United To Create 4,000 Jobs In 2006 posted Fri Mar 31 2006 22:20:14 by KarlB737
CAL To Grow/hire In 2006 posted Fri Mar 17 2006 01:20:18 by CLE757