Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Payload Restrictions/SYD-SFO  
User currently offlineLufthansa747 From Philippines, joined May 1999, 3201 posts, RR: 34
Posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1766 times:

Are there any payload restrictions on UA862 or other 744 services from Sydney to SFO or LAX. I flew on this flight a while ago and the plane was anything but full. The lady at check in however said that the flight is almost full. Thanks in advance.

LH747


Air Asia Super Elite, Cebu Pacific Titanium
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1691 times:

I believe that LAX-SYD (and return) is constantly weight-restricted, but I know for a fact that the weight restrictions on SFO-SYD go off an on, depending on the temps and winds aloft.

LAX-MEL is a constant, extreme w.r. flight.

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2594 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1680 times:

So, correct me if I'm wrong, if one wants to "spread out" on a transpacific flight, then one should fly LAX-MEL, since the flight would be weight-restricted and without the usual full complement of passengers?

Second question: Hard to believe from looking at the map, but is it true that SFO-SYD is a shorter distance than LAX-SYD?


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1676 times:

For the most comfortable flights, LAX-MEL is your choice.

It does seem hard to believe, but yes, SFO-SYD (vs LAX) is 70nm shorter thanks to the Great Circle flight path!





From
To
Distance
SFO (37°37'08"N 122°22'29"W)
SYD (33°34'S 151°06'E)
7405 mi
LAX (33°56'33"N 118°24'29"W)
SYD (33°34'S 151°06'E)
7478 mi

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineBig777jet From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1654 times:

There is other restriction loads from ORD-HKG on UAL 747-400. They mentioned no more than 300 pax (I can't remembered exactly number pax limit) because of loads and cargo with full fuel loads. It is a very long flight. I'm pretty sure some of restrictions in anywhere for long flights e.i. LHR-HKG, ATL-CPT, etc...

 


User currently offlineKen4556 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 169 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1644 times:

Flights are not weight restricted from SYD to LAX/SFO due to tail winds. The flight to the US is usually two hours less then from the US.

One time I had a 90 minute delay in SFO due to lack of headwinds and they cannot arrive into SYD before 6 am due to curfew.

Another time the heads winds were so bad and they could not get the plane light enough that we stopped in Guam for fuel.

Hope this helps...



User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2594 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1599 times:

Thanks for the great map, FLY777UAL! I guess the coast of (southern) California jags inward past Santa Barbara, so it makes it a bit easier to "see" how SFO might be closer to SYD than LAX.

User currently offlineJohnboy From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2594 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

Just got back from a 24-hr trip to Reno yesterday, and noticed (before the power went out at Oakland Airport), that a Tradewinds 767 was parked at Int'l gate at OAK. Since I couldn't look at the monitors (power out, right?), I decided to inspect the terminal. Wow! Was I ever surprised to see a huge line traversing the length of the ticket counters in Terminal 1! All the way from the Corsair/Martinair counter back to almost baggage carousel.
The ticket counter itself had a SATA sign slapped onto the ticket counter (and outside where the skycap works also). But they didn't have a destination on their board! I checked some luggage tags (surreptitiously, of course) and saw that they had "Acores Islands" upon them. Of course then it hit me that everyone was speaking Portuguese also. I didn't realize there were that many Azores Islander people in the Bay Area (the manner of their dress made me think they were from America). And what airline is SATA, anyway?


User currently offlineFlygga From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (14 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1584 times:

SATA is SATA International (SATA Air Acores). Last tuesday they started flying to the Azore Islands in the Atlantic (off the coast of Portugal) for SunTrips. They flights operate via BOS. They were supposed to be operated by SATA's A310. The Tradewinds must have been substitution. I did not know Tradewinds had a B767. They operate A300F frieghters and L1011's on pax charters. How was the Tradewinds painted. Was it a -200 or -300? The SATA flight was supposed to have left at 4:30pm. I wonder if they had equipment problems.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
United Mileage Upgrade SYD-SFO? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 10:08:10 by SA7700
UA 870 SYD-SFO Cancelled Friday Aug-18? posted Fri Aug 18 2006 01:16:49 by WestWing
QF/73&74 SYD-SFO-YVR VV posted Tue Jul 18 2006 07:58:32 by DYK
Photos Of Damage - UA870 SYD-SFO Bird Strike posted Sat May 27 2006 04:51:56 by Glennstewart
UA870 SYD-SFO Bird Strike posted Sun May 14 2006 19:08:46 by AirplaneCrazy
Qantas To Begin SYD/SFO In 2006 posted Tue Aug 9 2005 01:50:12 by QFBA
Boeing 767-300 - Payload Restrictions? posted Sun Oct 10 2004 03:41:03 by ETStar
Any Further Talks Of SQ SYD-SFO? posted Sat Sep 25 2004 02:06:38 by TonyBurr
UA Suspension Of SFO-SYD-SFO posted Mon Apr 14 2003 20:38:29 by KaiTakFan
747's Fuel / Payload Restrictions posted Tue Feb 25 2003 01:42:08 by Qantaspower