Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How Praful Patel Has Changed Indian Skies  
User currently offlineAirIndia From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1631 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3596 times:

An article with positives about PP...

The full article is on this link

Some excerpts...

The Indian Airlines' decision to acquire aircraft has been cleared but only after Patel created another layer of bureaucracy -- by setting up an Oversight Committee headed by a former Comptroller and Auditor General and getting the prime minister to set up an Empowered Group of Ministers so that acquisition issues didn't have to keep going back to Cabinet. The same structure will be replicated in the case of Air India when the Cabinet clears the acquisition.

Acquisition of aircraft is tricky business. Nothing is easier than charging the minister with corruption because so many variables are involved. Should aircraft be leased or acquired? What should the proportion be? Whom should they be bought from? Because these are large orders and because the market is limited, was enough care taken to leverage the purchase?

In the past several years, both Indian Airlines and Air India have been paralysed because ministers have been either too scared or too hamstrung to take these decisions.

The last time Air India bought aircraft, for instance, was in the 1990s. Even during Patel's ministership, the Indian Airlines board cleared acquisition in 2002, but the Memorandum of Understanding for the purchase is yet to be signed.


58 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineHimmat01 From India, joined Dec 2004, 1047 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3571 times:

Quoting AirIndia (Thread starter):
Even during Patel's ministership, the Indian Airlines board cleared acquisition in 2002, but the Memorandum of Understanding for the purchase is yet to be signed.

The rediff article has got it wrong. Patel became a minister only in May 2004. In 2002 that moron Shahnawaz Hussain was the civil aviation minister.



An airplane might disappoint any pilot but it'll never surprise a good one.
User currently offlineTS-IOR From Tunisia, joined Oct 2001, 3442 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3562 times:

Things could radically change if a political will is present. Every thing starts with papers and conventions...and then funds and market are easy to find and even easy to create !!!

Aviation in India,Emirates,...is at its edge mainly due to that factor.


User currently offlineCricket From India, joined Aug 2005, 2966 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3558 times:

That moron Shahnawaz is the man who started Air-India off on their fleet renewal program and refurbishment and also the guy who appointed Thulasidas - and compared to the other ministers in the NDA government Shahnawaz was by far and away the best (other than his glad-eye). PP has done a lot no doubt and low-cost travel has boomed under his stewardship and the rebuilding of the national carriers has begun in earnest - he is a good minister no doubt - but for gods sake why does a 1h35m BOM-DEL now take 2h00m at the very least? And for that I blame PP.


A300B2/B4/6R, A313, A319/320/321, A333, A343, A388, 737-2/3/4/7/8/9, 747-3/4, 772/2E/2L/3, E170/190, F70, CR2/7, 146-3,
User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3533 times:

Quoting Cricket (Reply 3):
but for gods sake why does a 1h35m BOM-DEL now take 2h00m at the very least? And for that I blame PP.

last time I flre DEL-BOM, it exactly tool 1h35m, though scheduled for 2 hr! Big grin

Yes, PP is a very good minister.. facts suggest that during his ministership far more happened than during 5 years NDA, with doutchebags like Rudy, Hussein, Yadav et al... a clear indicator for which government has the better remedies in terms of civil aviation, and maybe beyond..

Guru, I will reply to your email later...


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31660 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3517 times:

Quoting Cricket (Reply 3):
but for gods sake why does a 1h35m BOM-DEL now take 2h00m at the very least? And for that I blame PP.

Ours Still takes 1hr 40 mins With peacefull Non complaining Payload  Smile

I think PP has done a lot too,Maybe a little more time is needed to Finetune things.
After the Tarmec Bays are Expanded,the Terminal Expanded & the Exit Taxitracks in place.The Difference will be noticed.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineAirIndia From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1631 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3484 times:

Quoting Mrniji (Reply 4):
Guru, I will reply to your email later...

sure...

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 5):
peacefull Non complaining Payload

i like that...


Mel, I am leaving this saturday morning by KF 625AM. Tell me when you are free... would liek to meet up...


User currently offlinePlaneboy From India, joined May 2005, 199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3420 times:

By far the most useless ever civil aviation minister India has ever seen is C M Ibrahim (Cabinet rank, 1996), who was Deve Gowda's manFriday. He confessed recently that Gowda took him to Delhi to compensate his poor Hindi skills. Nothing could be more stupid than this! Now both are sworn enemies of each other.

Now PP is showing that he too can be equally idiot by supporting Gowda against Narayan Murthy when latter resigned from BIAL


User currently offlineTKMCE From India, joined May 2002, 841 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3416 times:

What PP has done is freed up Indian skies to competition more than anything else. I am not in favor of all out open skies nor I am in favor of plain dumb measures such as SAARC open skies- a brain child of the BJP govt incidentally and not PP (intended only to rob Indian Airlines and Air India of revenue from some of their bread and butter sectors and gift them to Air Lanka and indirectly Emirates). However PP, has gone and liberalised bilaterals with a vengeance and it has now been shown that not just the foreign carriers benefit but airlines like Indian Airlines and Air India (eg - AIs DEL ATQ BHX YYZ flight), not to speak of the passengers. THhowing open Iternational routes to t Jet and Sahara for the international routes has also meant that AI and IC are now more agressive than ever in opening up routes to claim their due share of entitlements before it falls into the hands of the private players. Eg are AIs new routes to both East Asia and the US, and Indian Airlines increased frequencies to BKK from places like HYD (good bye - the earlier South India Darshan HYD-BLR-MAA-BKK flight) or the direct BOM SHJ flight instead of the previous same plane service via CCJ and COK!

As for Airport congestion - well having worked for sometime in the greenfield airport sector, I can honestly say that the man is doing his best. The crucial agreements for the HYD project was signed during his tenue and as far as BLR is concerned the blame is on Devegowda who for all practical purposes remote controls the Karanataka govt , and who is putting delays in the project for reasons only best known to him. PP has also gone a long way in taking up the BOM DEL privatisation projects..

And the one thing I really liked is the DGCA directive that has modified legislation so that pilots if proven that they acted against the public interest can have their licence terminated if they they dont give 6 monnths notice!
Now that was brave.......... and shows that the chap does know what he is doing!


User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 48
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3315 times:

Quoting TKMCE (Reply 8):
I am not in favor of all out open skies nor I am in favor of plain dumb measures such as SAARC open skies- a brain child of the BJP govt incidentally and not PP (intended only to rob Indian Airlines and Air India of revenue from some of their bread and butter sectors and gift them to Air Lanka and indirectly Emirates).

SAARC open skies helped many, like me, who were able to travel to India during peak season and not pay an exorbitant price. Sure, SAARC open skies helped the likes of Emirates, but it also helped the Indian Economy with added visitors, businessmen, and so on. PP has correctly curtailed the open skies period to a shorter duration now that revised bilaterals have added new capacity.


User currently offlineMrNiji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3307 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 9):
SAARC open skies helped many, like me, who were able to travel to India during peak season and not pay an exorbitant price. Sure, SAARC open skies helped the likes of Emirates, but it also helped the Indian Economy with added visitors, businessmen, and so on. PP has correctly curtailed the open skies period to a shorter duration now that revised bilaterals have added new capacity.

I don't get the argument here. How is SAARC Open Skies related to you travelling from the States to India? I guess you did not take PK... And how is EK related ´to this? No offense at all, I just don't get it..  Smile


User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 48
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3291 times:

Quoting from the linked article on the issue of international flying rights:

Patel says that's not fair. A decision taken by him from, which private airlines have profited has been to let them fly abroad. The ministry devised a formula with two central variables: the number of years in the domestic market and the number of kilometers flown by the airline.
Two players met the criterion -- Jet Airways and Sahara Airlines. You could argue that a newcomer -- such as, say, Paramount or Deccan -- with a few thousand kilometers flying time, and just a few aircraft -- should be allowed to fly abroad from day one.
But you could argue that they should operate on the domestic circuit for a couple of years and only then be given permission to go abroad. Patel has opted for the latter argument.


IMO, international flying rights should have been open to everyone, including the likes of Air Deccan/Kingfisher. Air Deccan/Kingfisher would have done a better job than Air Sahara has done so far. At minimum, SE Asia sector should have been open to everyone.


User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 48
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3290 times:

Quoting MrNiji (Reply 10):
I guess you did not take PK... And how is EK related ´to this? No offense at all, I just don't get it..

I did not take either PK or EK. However, EK did provide additional seats/connections to MAA through Colombo, in alliance with Air Lanka. That possibility added many peak season seats and kept the overall prices low. I do remember one winter I was looking at a schedule of LAX-LHR on Virgin, and then on to Dubai/Colombo on EK, and then to MAA on Air Lanka. I was lucky to find something on Thai and avoid the longer route, both in miles and time.


User currently offlineMrNiji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3250 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 12):
I did not take either PK or EK. However, EK did provide additional seats/connections to MAA through Colombo, in alliance with Air Lanka.

You mean SriLankan  Wink - this does not offset the fact that the SAARC region is still regulated by bilats, i.e. India - Sri Lanka, India - Pakistan etc.. Hence, restrictions still apply

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 12):
However, EK did provide additional seats/connections to MAA through Colombo, in alliance with Air Lanka.

Since EK does not operate to India on UL code, the alledged open sky is not relevant. you are confused in the sense that code sharing agreements are subject to Traffic Restrictions

[Edited 2005-10-26 02:16:16]

User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 48
Reply 14, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3213 times:

Quoting MrNiji (Reply 13):
this does not offset the fact that the SAARC region is still regulated by bilats, i.e. India - Sri Lanka, India - Pakistan etc.. Hence, restrictions still apply

Didn't open skies during peak season mean no restictions on number of flights by SriLankan- hence, restrictions did not apply.

Quoting MrNiji (Reply 13):
Since EK does not operate to India on UL code, the alledged open sky is not relevant. you are confused in the sense that code sharing agreements are subject to Traffic Restrictions

I do not know if the entire ticket was on EK as I never bothered about the details as it was my last resort. My point is that the possibility of this connection, and the resulting increased supply keep prices on other connections in check.

BTW, last year I flew LAX-NRT-BKK on Japan Airlines purchased on the web, and then bought a ticket on Thai for BKK-MAA from an agent in MAA. I picked up my BKK-MAA ticket at Thai office at the BKK Airport. This worked out cheaper by at least US$400 compared to anything I could get on JAL or Thai. JAL does offer onward connections from BKK to MAA on IC and Thai. Surprisingly, Thai was more expensive than JAL. I look forward to doing a similar deal this winter, unless Thai has a good deal on their non-stop to BKK from LAX.


User currently offlineTKMCE From India, joined May 2002, 841 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3171 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 9):
SAARC open skies helped many, like me, who were able to travel to India during peak season and not pay an exorbitant price

Well... the airlines are not run for charity! To survive, they have to make money as well- and it is only during peak season they can raise fares! And believe me once the season ends, the fares drop very rapidly! The winter open sky now makes it worse in the India Middle East market - overcapacity in an off peak time further hits the yield!

The main beneficiary of SAARC open skies have been Sri Lankan and since EK is a major share holder, Emirates as well! It is not routes like MAA DXB where AI or IC is hit - instead it is places like CCJ which is a "Restricted" airport. But thanks to SAARC open skies, Srilankan has made a back door entry, and dumps capacity even during peak time ( ofcourse no doubt helping the likes of you) - but hurting the airlines and thereby hitting Air India and Indian Airlines...... No one wants to travel CCJ CMB, everyone is connecting onwards to the Middle East!


As the US domestic deregulation has show, too much too soon can hurt also!


User currently offlinePomnath From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3150 times:

All this is fine, but fact remains that despite so many new players and flights, not one airline has placed a "people mover" kind of service on the high density metro routes like DEL-BOM or BLR-MAA. Other than Air India and their patchwork service, the rest still flog the same 737/320 and even CRJ thus clogging up valuable tarmac time.

A few good single class 747 aircraft of the sort they use in Japan for high density short distance routes and most of the current churn would get resolved.

Incidentally, the loads AND yields pre-Diwali this year are amazing. Take a look at what Jet Airways and Kingfisher, for example, are achieving this weekend on BOM-DEL, for example.


User currently offlineLAXDESI From United States of America, joined May 2005, 5086 posts, RR: 48
Reply 17, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3127 times:

Quoting Pomnath (Reply 16):
A few good single class 747 aircraft of the sort they use in Japan for high density short distance routes and most of the current churn would get resolved.

Or how about 757, A330, and 777s? I am sure there is a good reason it has not been tried. I wonder why did Jet not use its A340s on London sector and use the freed up A330s on domestic routes?


User currently offlineAirIndia From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1631 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3123 times:

Quoting Pomnath (Reply 16):
few good single class 747 aircraft of the sort they use in Japan

Remember Cpt. Gopinath mentioning DN's intention of filling up a 380 with 800 pax on DEL-BLR... there was some thinking then.... maybe if KF get their 380 b4 comleting 5 yrs... they might ply them domestic.


User currently offlinePomnath From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3115 times:

I have NO IDEA why Air India does not operate one of the old 747-200s lying idle on some sort of a BOM-DEL-BOM shuttle route. I do know that Indian Airlines does operate one of their old A-300s on some routes which are otherwise operated by A-320s, when load demands or for operational reasons.

But using bigger / higher capacity aircraft on high density domestic routes would really free up tarmac and airspace.

The 380 is in the future. Those old 747s and 300s are Here & Now.

Why did Jet Airways not use their 340s on domestic routes? I guess it was because they were/are wet-leased already. Besides, the configurations are for international operations, and usng them on domestic might have impacted international schedule integrity.


User currently offlineAirIndia From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1631 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 3085 times:

Quoting Pomnath (Reply 19):
have NO IDEA why Air India does not operate one of the old 747-200s lying idle on some sort of a BOM-DEL-BOM shuttle route. I do know that Indian Airlines does operate one of their old A-300s on some routes

The airport infrastructure could be one reason. Can any domestic terminal handle the loads if say 2 747s carrying 500 pax each arrive simultaneously? Ok it may be too exaggerating to say that 2 747s might arrive toghether, but will the scenario be any different if suddenly 600 pax start to jam into the arrivals at either DEL or BOM...

Probably late night or early mornings are the right time to have such super economy low fare (I assume that the fares would be low on a high density single config arrangement) flights...


User currently offlineMrniji From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3078 times:

Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 14):
I do not know if the entire ticket was on EK as I never bothered about the details as it was my last resort. My point is that the possibility of this connection, and the resulting increased supply keep prices on other connections in check.



Quoting LAXDESI (Reply 14):
Didn't open skies during peak season mean no restictions on number of flights by SriLankan- hence, restrictions did not apply.

Finally I got your point! My bad, sorry..  Wink you are right.. but the Traffic Restrictions thing is something to keep in mind.. do a search in Amadeus for some flights operated on Codeshare Basis, you will see "TR" indicating Traffic Restrictions, i.e. only in conjunction iwth other tickets!

Quoting AirIndia (Reply 20):
The airport infrastructure could be one reason. Can any domestic terminal handle the loads if say 2 747s carrying 500 pax each arrive simultaneously?

They (AI) could use the international terminal.. however, there should not be any difference between the handling of two, let's say, A300 or a 742,.. especially since the latter are parked remotely (w/o aerobridges) in domestic operations.. btw, in regard to the latter, is there any airport in India where a domestic flights (apart from AI's flights, that are from int terminal) are welcomed by aerobridges? Or only those lousy IC buses exist?


User currently offlineHimmat01 From India, joined Dec 2004, 1047 posts, RR: 6
Reply 22, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3071 times:

Quoting AirIndia (Reply 20):
The airport infrastructure could be one reason. Can any domestic terminal handle the loads if say 2 747s carrying 500 pax each arrive simultaneously? Ok it may be too exaggerating to say that 2 747s might arrive toghether, but will the scenario be any different if suddenly 600 pax start to jam into the arrivals at either DEL or BOM...

DEL had the same arrival building both for international and domestic arrivals before May 1986. There must have been more than 2-3 B747s/DC10s/Tristars arriving within hours of each other. If it could handle it then, I guess a single B747 or A330/340 arriving at any given time should not pose a problem.

The only problem would be apron space for a B747 at DEL domestic terminal but it can be reconfigured to handle 747s.



An airplane might disappoint any pilot but it'll never surprise a good one.
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31660 posts, RR: 56
Reply 23, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3064 times:

Quoting AirIndia (Reply 6):
Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 5):
peacefull Non complaining Payload

i like that...

Its True  Smile

Quoting AirIndia (Reply 6):
Mel, I am leaving this saturday morning by KF 625AM. Tell me when you are free... would liek to meet up

I'll call you on Thursday Morning.

Quoting Planeboy (Reply 7):
Now PP is showing that he too can be equally idiot by supporting Gowda against Narayan Murthy when latter resigned from BIAL

N.Murthy should not have Resigned  Sad

Quoting TKMCE (Reply 8):
And the one thing I really liked is the DGCA directive that has modified legislation so that pilots if proven that they acted against the public interest can have their licence terminated if they they dont give 6 monnths notice!

6 Months is Criminal.Should be 3 months.I think its being challenged in Court.

Quoting Pomnath (Reply 19):
Why did Jet Airways not use their 340s on domestic routes

Didn't they use it for Bom-Del-Bom.

Quoting AirIndia (Reply 20):
Can any domestic terminal handle the loads if say 2 747s carrying 500 pax each arrive simultaneously

Considering parking at International Terminal & moving the Pax via Perimeter road to Domestic would be time consuming.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineCricket From India, joined Aug 2005, 2966 posts, RR: 7
Reply 24, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3027 times:

Firstly, PP is supporting Deve Gowda against NR because of political reasons in Karnataka - I think Deve Gowda is the worst PM we have had in the recent past - anyway we aren't discussing politics here anyhow. But East-Asian style people movers in India - hmmmm - I'ld love to see how long luggage takes then. Anyway, I would like someone in the know to tell me whats up with GOI? Its seen one heck of a lot of traffic growth and all sorts of times too - one of Go's flights will be late at night - isn't the Indian Navy throwing a fit?


A300B2/B4/6R, A313, A319/320/321, A333, A343, A388, 737-2/3/4/7/8/9, 747-3/4, 772/2E/2L/3, E170/190, F70, CR2/7, 146-3,
25 Pomnath : Jet Airways states that over 50% of their passengers travel with hand baggage only. And have you noticed how baggage reaches the carousel before the
26 Post contains images HAWK21M : With 0S already having their Famous Del-Amd-Bom-Amd-Del Night Flight. With more Night ops.More bays will be cleared at BOM regds MEL
27 TKMCE : Well being challenged in court - has been bandied about ever since the law came out more than a month back. Nothing has happened and even if they do
28 HAWK21M : I've spoken to Pilots on this Issue.They are confident of it being relaxed.Alsso depends on the CO.Out here Our Co allowed Pilots to join 9W,0S & It
29 Pomnath : From an owner/operators point of view, just wait till they get together in a few weeks, now that loads are going up, yields are shooting up and the d
30 Post contains images HAWK21M : Yeah thats a possibility of an Agreement between them,Then the Pilots would be Paid Bonded Labourers regds MEL
31 Cricket : I guess the situation will improve in about 18-24 months once a lot of the F/O's today become Commanders. But until then the situation with Commanders
32 Pomnath : Look at some of the cowboys and pretty boys in the co-pilot seat nowadays and once they become commanders, you and me are going to want to know at ti
33 Post contains images HAWK21M : If the Expat decides to Quit.How do you stop him.Although He can be prevented from Joining another "Indian" Operator. regds MEL
34 Post contains links and images AirIndia : in the mean while... Boeing ties up with IISc Bangalore for development of next gen aircraft... the link is here I am sure this should give impetus to
35 HAWK21M : HAL Built Emergency Exit doors for the A320s. regds MEL
36 Post contains images Cricket : Um, the software part has been happening for the last decade or so. But this time, particularly with the 787 the amount of involvement is huge. And o
37 AirIndia : Is it being exported to any other country.. But its a pity that a country that can send satellites into space has not even a single successful indegi
38 TKMCE : Does India have to waste huge amounts of money developing commercial transports? Atlest I guess we Indians learned from the foolishness of the Brits -
39 Post contains links and images HAWK21M : I heard the ALH was going to be sold to the Israel AF. If a 100-120 seater was Locally Manufactured.It would be cheaper in the long run. regds MEL[Ed
40 Post contains images Stealthpilot : 747s on Indian domestic routes?? Apart from BOM-DEL I don�t see it happening anytime soon (even a frequent Bom-Del is pushing it). It's not as s
41 Post contains links HAWK21M : I hope the Person who replaces Praful Patel continues the work. regds MEL
42 AirIndia : He is not leaving anytime soon... is he?
43 Himmat01 : If PP wants to really change the Indian skies, he should get rid of the clause which makes it obligatory for airlines to fly on unprofitable and socia
44 HAWK21M : Not in the near Future though. If there was Voluntary coverage of the NE Areas,then there would be no need of this clause.No one wants to fly in a lo
45 Cricket : SJR is actually a rather profitable sector - its the security (which is needed) that is the killer. If airlines had there way - DEL and BOM would be
46 HAWK21M : Hey.That qoute was by Himmat01 not me. All the more need for a lager capacity Aircraft,Although Timings matter. regds MEL
47 Post contains images Mrniji : This is, in my eyes, a VERY, VERY, VERY BAD and BACKWARD idea: - it can be good for an economy as a whole to serve unprofitable but economic valuable
48 Stealthpilot : On the issue of domestic routes i kind of agree with you, but international obligations? Could you expand on that idea please thanks? -Nikhil
49 Mrniji : Sure. Same as you have domestic routes that might be loss-making but good for the economy as a whole, you have such routes in international secondary
50 Cricket : Niji, I don't quite agree on the international route idea - international routes should not be operated for national interests alone. India might have
51 Post contains images MrNiji : you do of course have a point - of course, one could have another "more liberal framework" here - it was only an idea. This question is well debatabl
52 Cricket : True. But with domestic flights, after once chatting with Capt Gopinath, I think that if the right type of aircraft are used Cat-II and Cat-III routes
53 MrNiji : Another point that backs your position is the overall climate of competition. In the international field, the level of competition is higher, with mor
54 Blrsea : Why don't they charge private carriers a fee instead of forcing them to fly to economically unviable destinations? It doesn't make sense for 5 carrier
55 Blrsea : BTW, it appears that NW has cancelled the AMS-BLR flight.
56 Mrniji : I am in favor of competitive bidding for subsidies for economic not viable routes.. but your proposition is not bad, too Really??? Why: due to possib
57 Post contains links Blrsea : Check out this thread http://www.airliners.net/discussions...eneral_aviation/read.main/2408258/
58 LAXDESI : Excellent idea. Perhaps a new airline focused on these routes will emerge, or Deccan might service these routes on behalf of other airlines.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Air Travel Has Changed posted Mon Nov 17 2003 03:52:29 by Bigphilnyc
My, How Air Travel Has Changed Since... posted Sat Jun 1 2002 00:28:33 by BR715-A1-30
Old OAG Website Address Has Changed posted Thu Nov 23 2006 19:33:45 by N702ML
We're Sorry, The Price Of This Flight Has Changed posted Wed Mar 8 2006 04:54:52 by AMSMAN
Battle For Indian Skies posted Sun Jul 31 2005 03:15:28 by Beauing
Praful Patel Acknowledges Problem, Seeks Solutions posted Tue Feb 15 2005 06:13:44 by Dulleswatcher
US Civil Aviation - What Has Changed Since 9/11 posted Sun Dec 26 2004 16:05:15 by N593HA
How Many Pilots Has ... Got? posted Sun Jun 27 2004 11:17:57 by ChrisZRH
ATL, What Has Changed? posted Mon Feb 2 2004 12:51:16 by Ushermittwoch
How Many Crashes Has Korean Air Had? posted Sat Feb 22 2003 15:15:21 by 727LOVER