Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Deltas Passenger Figures  
User currently offlinePlanesailing From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 815 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2438 times:

In last weeks issue of Flight International, it had a list of passenger numbers for 2005.

Coming up top was Delta, with 110million passengers, with 5.3% growth.

I find it amazing that for an airline carrying so many passengers, with obvious loyalty, that they can be in debt by so much.

Obviously, I understand the logic of economics, but for an airline with that amount of opportunity and means to make money, it must be a pretty dire situation over there to be recording such losses.

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2426 times:

With pilots making a large salary compared to others (even after the cuts), not doing a good job of hedging gas futures, a large staff that is not cross-trained in multiple areas (Like Citrus or WN), and many other things it kind of makes sense. Plus, you know the old saying...Even to go to Hell you have to connect through Atlanta. Hopefully they will turn it around. Even then I use them on domestic trips and SkyTeam, or at least a SkyMiles partner, internationally.


"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlinePlanesailing From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 815 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2411 times:

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 1):
Hopefully they will turn it around.

If they cut the costs then at least they have a large loyal customer base from which to start making money from.


User currently offlinePanamair From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4792 posts, RR: 25
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2393 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Planesailing (Thread starter):
I find it amazing that for an airline carrying so many passengers, with obvious loyalty, that they can be in debt by so much.

Not surprising at all since many of these people are each paying $99 to fly from NY to LA or $69 one-way between NY and Florida...


User currently offlineDelta4eva From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 344 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2340 times:

Quoting Planesailing (Thread starter):
Coming up top was Delta, with 110million passengers, with 5.3% growth.

If I recall correctly, these numberq reflect the number of people on every flight. This means that a passenger traveling to Florida, and passes through ATL, then they would be counted twice, upon each boarding. I think this is why WN is up there too because so many people on WN pass through multiple boardings, in other words having more than one stop. DL relies heavily on their hub operations to transport people. Even so, DL still has a loyal FF base and boards an impressive number of people each year.



FLY DELTA JETS
User currently offlinePlanesailing From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 815 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2323 times:

Quoting Delta4eva (Reply 4):
This means that a passenger traveling to Florida, and passes through ATL, then they would be counted twice, upon each boarding.

I think that is fair enough though. You would count a person on a return flight twice. I would imagine an aircraft change if you are flying for instance JFK-ATL-MCO, therefore you are in effect on two seperate flights.

Quoting Delta4eva (Reply 4):
I think this is why WN is up there too because so many people on WN pass through multiple boardings

71 million passengers for WN.

Infact the 4 bankrupt US airlines all come in the top 11!


User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2315 times:

Quoting Panamair (Reply 3):
$69 one-way between NY and Florida...

Ahh...The Kosher Klipper route for the snowbirds. (Please don't let the flame war begin. It's just a nickname.)

Quoting Planesailing (Reply 2):
If they cut the costs then at least they have a large loyal customer base from which to start making money from.

They already make a ton of money off of me and my company. They need to cut the costs and raise the service level a wee bit (and maybe hire some hotty stewardesses!) Despite the cutbacks they will keep my service since they do a halfway decent job, get me upgraded to First, and offer the most nonstops from home here in ATL. If I ever move away from the hub I might consider another airline but even then they would have to make a good case for it.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineSkibum9 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1229 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2254 times:

Quoting Planesailing (Thread starter):
I find it amazing that for an airline carrying so many passengers, with obvious loyalty, that they can be in debt by so much.

You can thank an over dependence on the high-CASM RJs (big big mistake on DLs part), no fuel hedges, and to some degree high pilot costs (when compared to the competition).

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 1):
Plus, you know the old saying...Even to go to Hell you have to connect through Atlanta.

And to think, they continue to build ATL and shrink CVG. Doesn't make sense.



Tailwinds!!!
User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2237 times:

Quoting Skibum9 (Reply 7):
And to think, they continue to build ATL and shrink CVG. Doesn't make sense.

Economies of scale to some degree. But I see your point with CVG and its shrinking. I think DL may end up as ATL and SLC for hubs along with JFK and LAX as hopping off points for international flights. MCO will continue to be a focus city for the Mouse House and they will code share with SkyTeam partners for other access to cities and hubs.

Quoting Skibum9 (Reply 7):
You can thank an over dependence on the high-CASM RJs (big big mistake on DLs part), no fuel hedges, and to some degree high pilot costs (when compared to the competition).

Amazing how those numbers on RJs looked so good a few years ago and now a complete 180.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineDb373 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 231 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2216 times:

Quoting Skibum9 (Reply 7):
And to think, they continue to build ATL and shrink CVG. Doesn't make sense.

Doesn't make sense? Shrinking where they're hurting the most doesn't make sense? CVG has low O&D and mostly relies on connecting traffic. Atlanta on the other hand has a large O&D market, and relies heavily on that as well as connections. What exactly doesn't make sense to you?



Keep Delta My Delta
User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2203 times:

Quoting Db373 (Reply 9):
CVG has low O&D and mostly relies on connecting traffic.

I forgot that small but vital statistic. Very true. But it is still a nice hub to fly through and a peaceful airport versus the craziness of ATL sometimes.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineSkibum9 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1229 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2128 times:

Quoting Db373 (Reply 9):
Shrinking where they're hurting the most doesn't make sense? CVG has low O&D and mostly relies on connecting traffic. Atlanta on the other hand has a large O&D market, and relies heavily on that as well as connections. What exactly doesn't make sense to you?

Still doesn't make sense. Sure one would expect higher O&D at ATL as the Atlanta metro area is much bigger than the Cincinnati metro area, but ATL probably has lower yeilds as DL is facing feirce competition from AirTran. On the connecting traffic basis, I would have to say that on a percentage of connecting traffic ATL is much higher than in any other part of DL's network. So it doesn't make sense that they would downsize CVG and move traffic through ATL. For those who live in the northeast and are traveling west, or visa versa, connecting in ATL is very inconvenient. If DL wants to focus on higher yeilding domestic markets, this is were logic makes sense they focus, rather than the lower yeilding, highly competitive east coast corridor. Further, ATL is very prone to weather and ATC delays, even though there has been some improvement with the de-peaking. So the logic of focusing such a significant portion of connecting traffic on ATL, doesn't make sense.

Finally, one point of interest. At one point in time, CVG was known as DL's most profitable hub. Than came the massive influx of RJs, which drove costs sky high. So I would venture to say that the recent profitability issues with CVG is not due to the percentage of connecting vs. O&D, but rather some very bad decisions by DL in the past, and its over dependency on the RJs.



Tailwinds!!!
User currently offlineJetdeltamsy From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2986 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2061 times:

Quoting Planesailing (Thread starter):
I find it amazing that for an airline carrying so many passengers, with obvious loyalty, that they can be in debt by so much.

Obviously, I understand the logic of economics, but for an airline with that amount of opportunity and means to make money, it must be a pretty dire situation over there to be recording such losses.

Amount of opportunity? What are you talking about?

We are charging less than it costs to transport the vast majority of our customers. We have to do that to compete on price with other airlines that have lower operating costs. If we to charge profitable prices, our aircraft would be empty and the losses would be even greater than they already are. You mention loyalty. Loyalty in this country is pretty much based on price.

As these lower cost airlines have grown in size, we have been forced to offer more and more seats at below cost (for us) prices.

Until we can get our unit costs in line with these lower cost competitors, we will continue to hemorrhage cash.



Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2041 times:

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 12):
Loyalty in this country is pretty much based on price.

To an extent yet. But there are plenty of folks out there like me who remain very brand loyal. I buy Edge shaving gel over the Target brand because SC Johnson makes a better product that just happens to cost more. I do buy Target contact lens cleaner because it is the same as the name brand to me.
But I fly Delta, even at higher prices than AirTran, because they have more routes, better schedule, take care of me when flights get cancelled or delayed, and generally just do a good job. Wasn't it Meatloaf that said 2 out of 3 ain't bad?

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 12):
Until we can get our unit costs in line with these lower cost competitors, we will continue to hemorrhage cash.

Very well stated. I wish we had a magic cure to fix it all. If only we could find a way to fix the system and provide service equivalent to many foreign carriers. Unfortunately I believe those days might be gone.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlinePlanesailing From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 815 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1944 times:

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 12):
Amount of opportunity? What are you talking about?

If Delta cut their costs, so that the prices werent below costs, then a profit would be made.

If they continued on the same pricing strategy, they would have 110million people to make money from.

That is the opportunity.


User currently offlineMotif1 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 244 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

I have a question out of sheer curiosity.

Two weeks ago I flew BOS-DCA on a 40 seat CRJ-200s.

Here's a breakdown of my fare:
Fare: $156.28
Tax: $30.62
Total: $186.90


My questions is if this fare was below cost.

My outbound (DL5350 N468CA)


My return (DL5348 - N494CA)



Cheers!

Motif1

P.S. I want to fly direct BOS-IND on Nov 29. US quotes almost $500!!!

How could that be? On an ERJ I think.

P.P.S. Forgot to mention the loads
BOS-DCA was 100% full
DCA-BOS - I saw only one empty seat.

[Edited 2005-10-26 21:26:59]


Not only is this incomprehensible but the ink is ugly and the paper is from the wrong kind of tree
User currently offlineJetdeltamsy From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2986 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

Quoting Planesailing (Reply 14):
If Delta cut their costs, so that the prices werent below costs, then a profit would be made.

It's not so easy to do.

Our labor costs are so much higher than low cost carriers mainly because our employees have many years of experience and are paid to reflect that. The low cost carriers are relatively new, thus their employees are much lower on the pay scales than at Delta.

We also have huge costs associated with the larger aircraft we operate.

I agree that it's a big mess, and that the company needs to be restructured. But it is very a very complicated task.



Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
User currently offlineMiCorazonAzul From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1850 times:

Quoting Panamair (Reply 3):
Not surprising at all since many of these people are each paying $99 to fly from NY to LA or $69 one-way between NY and Florida...

and all just to compete with us. Unfortunately for them, they can't afford to have such low-fares....that's why they are in such bad financial conditions.

Getting rid of that "sorry excuse for an partner airline" would also help Delta out.....


User currently offlineDeltaGuy767 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 645 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1845 times:

Call me an idiot here but can someone please explain to me what you guys are talking about when you say O&D traffic? Also I think that once DL emerges from BK they will be able to compete better with the general aviation marketplace as they will expand through their international hubs @ JFK, ATL, and CVG possibly even BOS with their new terminal. I also believe once DL re-evaluates their need for 757's they can put more metal into the Song fleet and expand. Hopefully they will be able to repaint their scheme back to the WIDGET!!!!

From BDL  wave 
DeltaGuy767



A Good Landing is one you walk away from!
User currently offlineMiCorazonAzul From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1829 times:

Quoting DeltaGuy767 (Reply 18):
Call me an idiot here but can someone please explain to me what you guys are talking about when you say O&D traffic?

"origin and destination" traffic, meaning a passenger that originates in a city and the next stop is their destination, no connection basically. A person travelling from RSW to JFK is considered O&D while someone flying on us from RSW TO LAS connecting via JFK is NOT O&D.


User currently offlinePanamair From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4792 posts, RR: 25
Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1824 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DeltaGuy767 (Reply 18):
Call me an idiot here but can someone please explain to me what you guys are talking about when you say O&D traffic?

O&D = Origin and Destination. Basically refers to passenger traffic that begins or ends at that station. So basically, ATL O&D means traffic that either leaves from ATL or heads to ATL as a destination, not traffic that is connecting thru ATL.


User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 21, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 1822 times:

Quoting DeltaGuy767 (Reply 18):
Hopefully they will be able to repaint their scheme back to the WIDGET!!!!

Do you read Mike Straka's Grrr! column on foxnews.com? You and me both should be nominated for his "Stupid Little Dreamer" award for our desire to get the Widget back.

Viva La Widget!



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineDeltaGuy767 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 645 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1802 times:

Quoting Panamair (Reply 20):
O&D = Origin and Destination. Basically refers to passenger traffic that begins or ends at that station. So basically, ATL O&D means traffic that either leaves from ATL or heads to ATL as a destination, not traffic that is connecting thru ATL.



Quoting MiCorazonAzul (Reply 19):
"origin and destination" traffic, meaning a passenger that originates in a city and the next stop is their destination, no connection basically. A person travelling from RSW to JFK is considered O&D while someone flying on us from RSW TO LAS connecting via JFK is NOT O&D.

Thanks guys.

From BDL,  wave 
DeltaGuy767



A Good Landing is one you walk away from!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bad News For BMI - Passenger Figures Down posted Mon Mar 20 2006 13:11:40 by Concorde001
Some Ryanair Passenger Figures posted Fri Feb 24 2006 14:30:03 by Pe@rson
China Airports Passenger Figures posted Sun Nov 21 2004 05:59:14 by DBCooper
EMA Passenger Figures Down Again posted Wed May 19 2004 17:39:55 by DC-10 Levo
LBA Passenger Figures Up 32% posted Tue Jan 6 2004 19:27:20 by Capital146
Qatar Airways Passenger Figures Increase 50% posted Sat Apr 19 2003 16:25:27 by QatarAirways
Judge Says Arrested Ryanair Passenger Owed Apology posted Fri Dec 8 2006 13:10:09 by Door5Right
Brown Doubles Passenger Duty posted Wed Dec 6 2006 16:17:44 by Planesailing
Longest B-1900 Passenger Flight posted Mon Dec 4 2006 17:53:48 by Flyguy595
When Will The 747 Be Out Of Passenger Service? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 02:17:47 by Scalebuilder