Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Eos Article In Today's NYT  
User currently offlinePositiverate From United States of America, joined May 2005, 1590 posts, RR: 8
Posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2610 times:

Great article detailing the level of service on Eos between New York and Stansted...

http://travel2.nytimes.com/2005/11/0...=1130868744-8YIGJ5q+SOWXlavxiI32OA

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCs03 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2559 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I bet NYT will try MaxJet as well, and compare the service to Eos (and BA,VS,AA).

User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9817 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2517 times:

Nice article. Hopefully it will give Eos and Maxjet some recognition. There is definitely potential in LCC business class service. By having only business class seats on their planes, Eos and Maxjet won't have to subsidize heavily discounted economy seats. I hope both carrier succeed, and it won't be bad taking some profit away from big bad BASmile


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineFlightopsguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2498 times:

I don't think either airline is truly following the LCC model by going non-etops over the pond.

While etops is expensive, so is flying about 2 additional hours eastbound, and at least 30-45 mins longer westbound even under best wind conditions.

Wasn't it reported here on a-net that Maxjet already cut their fares, even before revenue service started?

Both of these carriers will depend on the strength of their marketing departments to corporate accounts to succeed.



A300-330 BAC111/146/J31/41 B99/1900 CV580 B707-777 DC8/9/10 L188/1011 FH227/28/100 SB340 DO228 EMB2/170 CR2-900 SH330-60
User currently offlineFlyNYC From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2328 times:

Quoting Flightopsguy (Reply 3):
While etops is expensive, so is flying about 2 additional hours eastbound, and at least 30-45 mins longer westbound even under best wind conditions.

"Two additional hours eastbound"?? Eos flies to Stansted, not Scandinavia.

Eos Airlines is not an LCC by any stretch of the imagination, but a premium business class product. It certainly has competitive fares compared to other business class products, which means that it is focused on providing the most value to the customer... and that it is trying to capture market share.

With a $0.75 + CASM, it is certainly not a "low cost carrier".

Eos is at a clear advantage compared to MAXjet. First, Eos has only 48 seats to fill, compared to MAXjet's 102. Secondly, Eos has a much better product. Eos was designed from the ground up as a premium business class product, by experienced industry executives and investors who know a lot about delivering high-end service.

MAXjet (formerly known as "Skylink") was designed as a low cost, transatlantic flying bus... much like People Express or the "skytrain". MAXjet was supposed to fly out of the DC area (first BWI, then IAD)... and possibly even get feed from FLYi.

Well, needless to say... basing a business plan partly on "feed from FLYi" isn't a very good idea. Now, MAXjet has morphed into a "business class" airline. Unlike Eos, MAXjet doesn't have a lie-flat bed, as much personal space or a very well through out business product in general.

Plus, the B767 is just the wrong airplane for this mission.

Without much funding, and with a haphazardly thrown together business plan, don't expect MAXjet to be plying the north Atlantic skies for long.


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7438 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2282 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting FlyNYC (Reply 4):
Without much funding, and with a haphazardly thrown together business plan, don't expect MAXjet to be plying the north Atlantic skies for long.

I don't think either one of them will. If they're looking to lure business travellers, why would they risk wasting money on a fledging operation, between 2 markets that are so heavily travelled, with so muh competition. Most business travellers are too loyal to the frequent flyer programmes to take risks like that with all the perks that they get already. I would expect them to get even more if these carriers last more than a month. My guess is that these 2 carriers will either take the low-cost, charter course or fold altogether.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineFlyNYC From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2220 times:

It's definitely a gamble. The frequent flyer program will certainly be one challenge. Also, with a huge amount of business seat capacity in the market... one would think that BA, VS, UA, AA and CO could easily make things very painful for the startups.

I guess the theory is that there is enough business traffic in this market that is craving an exclusive, business-focused product... a void that has been left somewhat with the departure of the Concorde.

These new startups are primarily targeting the financial services / banking industry... which Stansted is better suited to serve.

But, will there really be enough people switching from the established carriers to the startups to make this a viable plan?

The NYC-LON market is definitely a fat, rich market... and one of these carriers may survive off the crumbs. But will they be able to expand and grow? Seems unlikely.

But on the other hand, what is there to fill the gap between business class in a jumbo and the $50K to $100K transatlantic flight in a private jet? One would think that there is a niche for a differentiated, specialized product like Eos.

MAXjet's strategy on the other hand (undercutting the network carriers) is a lose-lose plan.


User currently offline7LBAC111 From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 2566 posts, RR: 35
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2151 times:

Quoting FlyNYC (Reply 6):
These new startups are primarily targeting the financial services / banking industry... which Stansted is better suited to serve.

Definately, an often overlooked fact! People think London's financial district, and think LCY or simply LHR. With the Stansted Express rail link connecting Liverpool Street, STN has much more potential for premium traffic than it currently sees.

Are there any carriers apart from MAXJet and Eos, who offer premium service into STN?

7LBAC111



Debate is what you put on de hook when you want to catch de fish.
User currently offlineFlyNYC From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 24 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1982 times:

Quoting 7LBAC111 (Reply 7):
Are there any carriers apart from MAXJet and Eos, who offer premium service into STN?

Only Eos and MAXjet serve Stansted from NYC, or from anywhere in the US for that matter.

In addition, the New York transit authority is planning to build a high-speed rail link between the new World Trade Center / Fulton Street station in downtown Manhattan, to JFK International. This will further solidify the Wall Street - Stansted connection. However, I believe that the proposed completion of this rail link is over 5 years away.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Gravelly Point Article In Today's WP posted Tue Jul 12 2005 14:29:47 by CV990A
Article On A380 In Today's Guardian (UK) posted Thu Feb 23 2006 13:17:12 by Feroze
Mothballed Airliner Article In USA Today posted Tue Oct 30 2001 19:00:22 by Tom in NO
PHL Terminal Article In Phila. Inquirer posted Tue Oct 17 2006 00:27:12 by BishopOfPHL
Korean Air Article In Avweek - Upcoming KAL Order posted Mon Oct 16 2006 15:05:44 by UAL747-600
Spotting Article In The New York Times posted Sun Jun 11 2006 14:03:37 by BigPhilNYC
TW/UA Grand Canyon Collision Article In LA Times posted Mon Jun 5 2006 21:04:09 by Tom in NO
Are Power-off Landings Done In Today's Heavies? posted Fri Jun 2 2006 08:49:42 by Scoliodon
FlyGlobespan Growth Article In Glasgow Herald posted Mon May 22 2006 12:32:48 by BMIE70
Runway Safety Article (USA TODAY) posted Mon Apr 24 2006 23:49:35 by Goodmanr