Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air NZ Drops TPE  
User currently offlineTG992 From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 2910 posts, RR: 10
Posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3352 times:

Hi all,

Unfortunately Air NZ has terminated services to Taipei for good and NZ metal will no longer be seen there. When the EVA-Air NZ airshare venture ends in March 2006 the NZ code will no longer appear at all to Taipei.

While the fact that Shanghai services will commence in late 2006 gives the impression that some political reasons were behind the withdrawal, it appears that TPE was the least profitable route in the network following a large decline in Taiwanese migration and tourism to New Zealand. I can well believe this as the TPE flights I've crewed this year have been on the whole pretty empty.

It's never nice to see a destination go, and I'll miss TPE. Hopefully conditions will improve in the long-term and we can go back there one day.


-
30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTPEcanuck From Taiwan, joined Oct 2005, 89 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3321 times:

It's ironic, this morning as I woke up listening to the radio I heard about a NZ Cheese event sponsored by NZ.

I guess if it's mostly a leisure market (and perhaps only 1 way at that) or people travelling home, it doesn't generate a lot of customers. I think SQ has pretty cheap prices on the route with a stop in Singapore, which for me was attractive the 2 times I've travelled to NZ as I could visit friends in S'pore along the way.

Ahhh, one less international carrier for TPE. Now we have more reason to choose airlines with the advanced ability to use taxiways for take-off. (SQ with great tragedy, and CI and BR without in Anchorage) Great.

Someone may jump on me for that...I suppose it could happen to anyone, and in TPE, SQ said the runway markings, lights and lack of ground radar meant TPE is not quite up to international standards. Ok, perhaps it was true then, perhaps true today. Does anyone know?


User currently offlineAerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7334 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3295 times:

Not really a surprise really though. Oh well hopefully BR will have better luck with their 332 flight (very nice onboard...)

User currently offlinePlanemanofnz From New Zealand, joined Sep 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3275 times:

Quoting Aerorobnz (Reply 2):
Oh well hopefully BR will have better luck with their 332 flight (very nice onboard...)

Do Br fly to TPE from AKL now? Since when?


User currently offlineAerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7334 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3234 times:

Quoting Planemanofnz (Reply 3):
Do Br fly to TPE from AKL now? Since when?

Since about 3 weeks ago. I think it is only for the high season through to March, but may be permanent with this announcement. Nice new 332s these days.


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26015 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3221 times:

The Taiwan market has become quite a unique one in recent year. Both from a passenger and cargo point of the view the market is quite strong, however yields are quite terrible in both areas.

The low yield environment for the most part has been created by the very high capacity China Airlines and to a lesser extent EVA Air have in the markets. Both carriers on the passenger side regularly offer as standard business practice rates that would be considered bulk rates including heavy discounts in premium classes. On the cargo side the recent sizable buildup in freighter capacity by both China Air Cargo and EVA Cargo are creating strong downward pressure on rates.

Hence, Taiwan has been a market that has experienced reductions in service by foreign passenger and cargo companies in recent years.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineKahala777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3209 times:

This has a lot to do with NZ and their new service to Shanghai!

KAHALA777


User currently offlineTrex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4833 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3130 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting TPEcanuck (Reply 1):
Ahhh, one less international carrier for TPE. Now we have more reason to choose airlines with the advanced ability to use taxiways for take-off. (SQ with great tragedy, and CI and BR without in Anchorage) Great.

what BR incident at ANC are you talking about???

back on topic, wouldn't a flight to NZ with a stop say in Queensland (BNE, CNS etc) make more sense


User currently offlineTPEcanuck From Taiwan, joined Oct 2005, 89 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3113 times:

Hi Trex8,

The 'incident' occured on Nov 5 2005 at ANC. It has not been confirmed, but is under investigation by the NTSB. There is a thread on it in civil aviation.

Very serious if proven true.


User currently offlineFlyingHippo From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 705 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3066 times:

Sigh... It really makes me sad to see how far TPE has fallen out of the international travel. Before, we had BA, AA, CO, NZ, Swiss, etc, coincided with it's economy hitting on all cylinders in the late 80s and early 90s.

Now, look at TPE... NZ is pulling out completely, AA no longer flies there, NW cut it's flights, and UA no longer flies there direct... Makes me sad...


User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5359 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 2944 times:

It is sad.

Hopefully B might do TPE-AKL year round, I wonder if they will? So even the arrangement with BR ends? I wasn't aware of that.


User currently offlineIL96M From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 138 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 2937 times:

Quoting TG992 (Thread starter):
It's never nice to see a destination go, and I'll miss TPE

No you won't. Taipei is an awful place - Shanghai by comparison is like NY of the East!


User currently offlineGardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1522 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2894 times:

Sort of expected this. I remember months ago NZ did expect to trim on loss-making routes, and I thought TPE would get the chop.

What a far cry from 1991 when the route was launched - it was a big money maker back then. NZ even went up to 4 a week I think, two non-stops and two via Brisbane.
Interesting how times have changed, for example TPE was added and ADL was dropped- now it is the exact opposite.

I hope that EVA will maintain year-round services now. I have seen their 767s at AKL on a few occasions, nice to know they have upgraded to the 330.

Other notable withdrawals from TPE are Qantas/Australian Airlines, and Lufthansa/Condor.


User currently offline777ER From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 12269 posts, RR: 18
Reply 13, posted (9 years 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2859 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting Aerorobnz (Reply 4):
but may be permanent with this announcement

How does permanent three flights per week sound using A330s?


User currently offlineTG992 From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 2910 posts, RR: 10
Reply 14, posted (9 years 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2831 times:

For those of you wondering about the NZ/BR relationship - until 2002 NZ and BR operated a three times weekly airshare joint venture - NZ metal would operate on Monday, BR on Weds, NZ on Friday, for example. In 2002 this was replaced with a six-monthly operational rotation (NZ operated April-October, BR operated November-March)

Quoting IL96M (Reply 11):
Quoting TG992 (Thread starter):
It's never nice to see a destination go, and I'll miss TPE

No you won't. Taipei is an awful place - Shanghai by comparison is like NY of the East!

How arrogant of you to assume that your impression of Taipei is shared by everyone. On my six visits so far this year I've found it a vibrant, bustling place.

Quoting Kahala777 (Reply 6):
This has a lot to do with NZ and their new service to Shanghai!

KAHALA777

On the contrary - it has nothing to do with it. Several carriers operate to China and Taiwan without any political problems at all.



-
User currently offlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7110 posts, RR: 12
Reply 15, posted (9 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2778 times:

Sad to see TPE go. Whats with us going to PVG next year? I can't seem to find info anywhere!!!

User currently offlineTG992 From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 2910 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (9 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 2751 times:

We've applied to the appropriate regulatory authorities in China to start three times weekly service to PVG, commencing 'late' 2006 (word is November). A 777 will be used on the route.


-
User currently offlineFlyingHippo From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 705 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (9 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2682 times:

Quoting TG992 (Reply 14):
How arrogant of you to assume that your impression of Taipei is shared by everyone. On my six visits so far this year I've found it a vibrant, bustling place.

Don't mind him, at least our airlines are making a profit.


User currently offlineETA Unknown From Comoros, joined Jun 2001, 2087 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (9 years 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2599 times:

TG992- what are you smoking? Taipei a nice place?!? Are you kidding?
I've been to over 50 countries and the city of Taipei ranks as one of the worst on my list, after Lusaka.


User currently offlineB742 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 3768 posts, RR: 19
Reply 19, posted (9 years 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2565 times:

This is old news, I mentioned this in my Eva Air post a while back!

Eva Air will use the A330-200 and take over the route from NZ...

but Air NZ will take over the route again in April, according to the schedules!

The NZ schedules show NZ 763 on the route from April!

Quoting Kahala777 (Reply 6):
This has a lot to do with NZ and their new service to Shanghai!

Not realy as the route has nothing to do with TPE! PVG is going to be flown by the 777's not the 767's and TPE is comming back!

Rob!  wave 


User currently offlineKiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8601 posts, RR: 13
Reply 20, posted (9 years 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2524 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting B742 (Reply 19):
This is old news, I mentioned this in my Eva Air post a while back!

Eva Air will use the A330-200 and take over the route from NZ...

but Air NZ will take over the route again in April, according to the schedules!

The NZ schedules show NZ 763 on the route from April!

yes , but I think what you have missed is that they will not be back on the route - and that is what this topic is about - not the use of the BR A330 during the (southern) summer timetable

http://www.airnz.co.nz/aboutus/mediacentre/pressreleases/default.htm

edited to change "summer" to "(Southern) summer" to avoid confusing our Northern Hemisphere friends who have the seasons the wrong way around

[Edited 2005-11-17 21:32:56]


Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
User currently offlineAerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7334 posts, RR: 13
Reply 21, posted (9 years 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2484 times:

Quoting ZK-NBT (Reply 10):
So even the arrangement with BR ends?

I would expect when the scheduled summer flights cease or otherwise not until the timetable changes in March.

Quoting 777ER (Reply 13):
How does permanent three flights per week sound using A330s?

The 332 flights so far haven't been particularly full despite the season, but it may be more sustainable with a base in TPE than NZ is based from here.


User currently offlineTG992 From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 2910 posts, RR: 10
Reply 22, posted (9 years 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 2418 times:

Quoting ETA Unknown (Reply 18):
TG992- what are you smoking? Taipei a nice place?!? Are you kidding?
I've been to over 50 countries and the city of Taipei ranks as one of the worst on my list, after Lusaka.

Yes, but my post didn't say "ETA Unknown will miss Taipei", did it?  banghead 
I'm sorry you didn't appreciate Taipei, but I did.



-
User currently offlineTPEcanuck From Taiwan, joined Oct 2005, 89 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (9 years 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2360 times:

Quoting ETA Unknown (Reply 18):
TG992- what are you smoking? Taipei a nice place?!? Are you kidding?



Quoting IL96M (Reply 11):
No you won't. Taipei is an awful place

Note sure what either of these posts have to do with the thread. Were you both frequent travellers on AKL-TPE? Is that why it's cancelled?

This is an aviation site. If you didn't enjoy Taipei, please find a site where you can post your city reviews!

In my experience, the enjoyment or lack thereof of a foreign city is more a reflection on the TRAVELLER than the destination. It's too bad that both of you missed one of Asia's more vibrant cities with a Chinese food culture second to none. But I guess you are the types of travellers who know everything about your destination within 2 minutes of leaving the jetway.


User currently offlinePlanemanofnz From New Zealand, joined Sep 2005, 1676 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (9 years 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 2279 times:

Sad to see NZ leave TPE. This means that untill Shanghai comes on the network in November *or around that time* next year, we will only be seeing 3 asian countries being served by NZ. On another note it is great news to see another new airline at AKL and another airline operating the A330!

25 777ER : BR is not really a new airline as BR have been operating to AKL for a few years now, previously with B763s and now A330s
26 ETA Unknown : TPE is a smog-polluted city with virtually nothing to see. Sad, but true. Many years ago EVA tried to lure some Royal Brunei 767 first officers (even
27 FlyingHippo : So I guess you don't like LA, NY, Hong Kong, MEX, GRU, DEL, BOM, PEK, PVG, etc., etc. eh? All of these cities have air polution problems and smoggs,
28 ETA Unknown : Actually Hippo, all those cities have things to see, so that compensates for the black smog. By the way, LAX/NYC/HKG/DEL/PEK/PVG are brilliant- there
29 Vincewy : I've been to both MEX and TPE (I'm on vacation here now), you must be smoking, especially comparing Lusaka with TPE, how long have you actually been
30 TPEcanuck : ETA, I'm not arguing! You certainly have a right to your opinion. But I would like to extend an invitation to you to come to Taipei so I can show you
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air NZ Drops Singapore. posted Wed Jul 12 2006 07:28:37 by Kiwiflyer791
Freedom Air (NZ) Beefs Up OZ, Drops Dom NZ Service posted Fri Jul 12 2002 05:42:54 by JaseWGTN
Air NZ Undersupplies LHR-LAX Route posted Tue Dec 5 2006 00:55:29 by Koruman
Air NZ Coy On Virgin posted Fri Nov 17 2006 02:57:29 by Australia1
Air NZ 'may Cut' Trans Tasman Services posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:01:28 by Australia1
If NZ Drops HNL Who Else Will Operate? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 08:14:37 by ZKNBX
Air NZ AKL-SFO Service, Daily? posted Wed Oct 25 2006 05:31:10 by NZ748
Air NZ Makes Changes To Unprofitable Pacific Route posted Wed Oct 25 2006 05:26:28 by NZ748
Fabric Out, But Air NZ Uniform Colours To Stay posted Sun Oct 22 2006 22:00:14 by NZ560
Air NZ May Axe Division With 1675 Staff posted Wed Oct 11 2006 19:54:43 by NZ560