BBJII From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 850 posts, RR: 4 Posted (9 years 6 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1961 times:
Im just trying to get a feel for the Boeing Fleets:
please advise me of any i've missed:
Boeing 737-100/200/300/400/500/600/700/800/900 BBJ/BBJII
Boeing 747-100/200/300/400/800 (did i miss the 500/600/700's)
Boeing 757-200/300/400 was there a 100?
Boeing 767-200/300/400 was there a 100?
Boeing 777-200/300 was there a 100? will there be a 400?
What have I missed?
I'm talking main line Jetliners and main models,such as 100/200 not er/scb/m/adv etc.....
[Edited 2005-11-18 19:40:53]
Remember: The Bird Hit You, You Didn't Hit The Bird.....
GQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1948 times:
Not sure about the 707-200...but the 707-300 was the big seller...also add the 707-400 (RR Conway engines). No 747-900, just the 747-8 for now. No 757-100, or 767-100, or 777-100. Think it's very unlikely (if not physically impossible) that you'll see a 777-400.
The -100 was an idea that Boeing floated around for a shrink. It could have made a more effective competitor to the A332 than the 764 was but DL and CO wanted the 764 and no other airline was interested in a Boeing aircraft of that spec.
The -400 would probably be too big to fit inside the stands but the idea was considered. With the launch of the 748, that market is now covered.
The -500/600/700 were all conceptual idea for a new 747 that no-one was interested in. They were probably a little too bold. The -8 is so called because of the connection to the 787 technology and because suddenly aircraft manufacturer's have taken to numerology.
Grantcv From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 430 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 6 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1588 times:
Boeing 737-100/200/200QC/200C/200/200Adv/300/400/500/600/700/800/900/900ER BBJ/BBJII