Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US/HP Will They Have To Many RJ's?  
User currently offlineCumulonimbus From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3431 times:

I Noticed With the HP/US Merger And Air Wisconsin coming online as an Express carrier it looks like they will have an Issue with over capacity with High Casm 50 to 70 seat RJ's!! Do they really need that many RJ's? I would think Some Dash 8-300 and 400 or some ATR's would be a good fit to supplement RJs on the many short Haul East Coast routes. Will they park some of the 50 seaters or does there New Route Network support the Number of RJs?
Well any info on this subject would be appreciated or just an opinion.

Mike

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFCYTravis From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1191 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3385 times:

Some of the other USX RJ providers are being pulled down. Notably, Mesa won't be doing any USX East 50-seat flying anymore... but their 50-seaters in the West will remain - and the 86-seat CR9s will potentially expand.

I think Trans States and Chautauqua are also being phased down to some extent. PSA is getting 70-seaters...

I guess you could say that UA and US are swapping SJPs.

[Edited 2005-11-24 00:39:10]


USAir A321 service now departing for SFO with fuel stops in CAK, COS and RNO. Enjoy your flight.
User currently offlineJmc1975 From Israel, joined Sep 2000, 3315 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3379 times:

Definately not ATRs, but rumor has it, they are looking hard at the Q400, which has a much lower CASM than the CRJ and CR7.


.......
User currently offlineHPRamper From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4153 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3334 times:

The CR9 are the best thing Mesa has going for them, they will be taking more even if they drop smaller aircraft

User currently offlineFCYTravis From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1191 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 3319 times:

They might be great for Mesa, but the CR9s suck as far as having to fly them goes. Did one PHX-OAK and it was horrible. Can't imagine having to do a midcon on them.

Plus, nothing like exPlus, so even us FlightFundies sit in the back.

I'd much rather see more Embraer 170s or 190s. With a six-seat F cabin, please.



USAir A321 service now departing for SFO with fuel stops in CAK, COS and RNO. Enjoy your flight.
User currently offlineHPRamper From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4153 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 3155 times:

A regional is a regional, that's why they don't fly mainline planes. I had to ride in a CR9 from PDX-PHX...about 2 and a half hours. I can deal.

I can't wait for the Embraers, but those will be mainline, not Mesa.


User currently offlineFlyboyaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3062 times:

The CR9's are a fine aircraft to fly in. I found them to be very comfortable...much more so than the 200's.

User currently offlineFCYTravis From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1191 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3041 times:

OK, more comfortable than the CRJ-200 is like saying an airline's seat pitch is better than RyanAir's. It just about can't possibly be worse.

I think the operative phrase is "damning with faint praise."



USAir A321 service now departing for SFO with fuel stops in CAK, COS and RNO. Enjoy your flight.
User currently offlineHPRamper From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4153 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 month 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3014 times:

I'd rather fly a Saab than a CR2. The engine drone puts me right to sleep  Smile

User currently offlineJmc1975 From Israel, joined Sep 2000, 3315 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (9 years 1 month 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 2879 times:

The CR9s are OK as long as you are on an empty flight or in a aisle seat. I was on a 2.5 hour SAT-PHX flight against on window on a full flight, with a big burly dude sitting next to me.....it was miserable. The E170/E190 are far superior in terms of comfort.


.......
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UPS MD-11F's...... How Many Will They Have? posted Thu Aug 22 2002 11:33:25 by Hkgspotter1
Air Jamaica 757s, How Long Will They Have Them? posted Wed Aug 16 2006 02:44:48 by JAM747
Us Airways Will Discontinue Service To KIN And SDQ posted Thu Jun 8 2006 20:02:27 by M180up
If SQ Gets Aus-US Rights, Will They Hub At SYD or MEL? posted Fri Jan 13 2006 17:25:39 by Daddy1
US/HP Submit Merger Applications To DOT posted Sat Jul 9 2005 07:44:24 by A330323X
Landing Lights: When Do They Have To Be Off? posted Sat Apr 10 2004 09:43:49 by Aguilo
Northwest Airlines; Why Did They Have To Do This? posted Thu Oct 30 2003 02:18:20 by Superfly
LHs A340-600s: Where Will They Fly To? posted Sun Mar 30 2003 11:35:01 by StarFlyer
US Coach-class Won't Have To Starve posted Fri Jan 10 2003 10:02:39 by Backfire
HP/US - Will They Actually Re-Brand? posted Thu May 12 2005 22:55:52 by Aloha717200