Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Be Hypothetical: Sonic Routes?  
User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1612 times:

As topic line, assume most or all technical aspects have been solved or are have minimal impact. For example:

  • A hypersonic Mach 20 (5.8 km/s) flight from LAX - HKG with engines shut off and coasts in a projectile flight until destination, how many flights/day, how many pax? Sounds be pretty efficient, IMO. Thought it would probably take 20 minutes and 2000 miles just to get up to speed...


  • Or how about a transsonic lowboom M1.5 flight from SFO-ORD?


  • Pick a speed, pick a route, pick a carrier, I want to see what you folks can come up with.

    [Edited 2005-11-28 07:28:52]


    The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
    6 replies: All unread, jump to last
     
    User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
    Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1590 times:

    Regardig hypothetical M20 flight:

    From a R&D sense, going one-fourth as fast, 60 miles per minute, would render the flight being twice as long. I don't see the point of going near orbital for commercial flights within planet Earth. In fact, if a plane had the same range capability as 788 but with twice the speed, that plane would sell like hot cakes, IMO.

    So I ask where would something like that fly?



    The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
    User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3598 posts, RR: 21
    Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1579 times:

    NRT to anywhere JL would want to fly them. They originally ordered (I think) the Concorde. Of course NH would follow suit.

    SQ would do it first and fly it SIN-NYC and anywhere else it wanted to.
    Personally I would like to see NGO-DTW in NW colors. 11 hours down to 1. I could go home every weekend.



    Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
    User currently offlineEGTESkyGod From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 1712 posts, RR: 12
    Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1506 times:
    Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

    Gotta say that the London to Sydney, or anywhere in Europe to Australia could be a valid routes. Fair to say it wouldn't be used on any of the "shorter" flights, eg transatlantic flights, not at Mach 20, anyway.

    I would like to see a SUPERsonic airliner again in the near future, before we even think about HYPERsonic!!



    I came, I saw, I Concorde! RIP Michael Jackson
    User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2809 posts, RR: 10
    Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1494 times:

    Mach 20? That's faster than Columbia was travelling when it broke up!

    User currently offlineMD80fanatic From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 2659 posts, RR: 10
    Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

    A hyper-sonic (sub-orbital) flight from LAX-HKG would need to launch (and travel eastward) for better fuel economy. It would probably take twice the fuel to attain a projectile-like flight to the west (against the Earth's rotation). The "long way" would still be much much faster than anything you can imagine...maybe less than 2.0 hours gate to gate.

    Airlines who could do it? Heck I dunno.....you guys and gals are the business people.  Wink

    In the late 70's early 80's, it was projected that we would have these type of transports after the turn of the century. I wonder what happened?

    Same time frame....it was also projected that shape-memory alloys (metals that change shape predictably, with changing temperature) would find their way into aviation (like a airfoil that changes shape to match it's thermal environment)? I wonder what happened?


    User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
    Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 1316 times:

    To me, a low hypersonic M5-8 is more reasonable for transports than in the teens or more; half my concentration is there. I'm not an advocate for spaceplane-ism.

    Interesting replies folks, especially no American carriers or the now [in]famous EK and their obcession with widebodies... Wink

    Quoting EGTESkyGod (Reply 3):
    I would like to see a SUPERsonic airliner again in the near future, before we even think about HYPERsonic!!

    You know there is talk of skipping supersonic straight to high-hypersonic to bypass the sonic boom issue, I don't see the logic. Any aircraft leaving a traditional airport will have to accelerate above suburbia before it gets high enough for the boom to become negligible. Without any low-boom technology researched, IMO, there is no point.

    I'm an advocate for low-boom technology, the other half. Big grin



    The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
    Top Of Page
    Forum Index

    This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

    Printer friendly format

    Similar topics:More similar topics...
    Will DL 767-400s Be Flying Int'l Routes? posted Sat Oct 15 2005 14:44:39 by Flydl2atl
    I Think BSC Might Be A Trans-Sonic Criuser posted Mon Mar 25 2002 06:10:24 by Lehpron
    BE Launches Two New Routes From NWI! posted Wed Feb 22 2006 15:28:18 by SQNo1
    What Will SQ's Initial Routes Be For The A380? posted Sun Feb 19 2006 05:25:01 by KDTWFlyer
    Fly Be. - New Routes For Summer 2006! posted Tue Nov 29 2005 15:47:15 by SQNo1
    Suspended SQ Routes....Will They Be Back 1 Day? posted Wed Jun 9 2004 20:05:29 by United Airline
    New (old Pre-9/11)VS Routes Be Announced? posted Sun Feb 1 2004 04:32:19 by ORDnDFW777
    What do you think the Airbus 380 routes will be? posted Fri Jan 9 2004 05:07:31 by Mckennasmall
    AA Routes To Be Booted posted Thu Nov 13 2003 06:59:18 by Thrust
    Braniff Concorde---routes to be used? posted Tue Oct 7 2003 02:03:20 by Jeffrey1970