Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F9 Expected To Post A Loss  
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6520 posts, RR: 51
Posted (8 years 8 months 22 hours ago) and read 4191 times:

I'm not sure if this was covered or not, but here you go...

http://denver.bizjournals.com/denver.../2005/10/24/daily66.html?from_yf=1

The up and down financial saga of F9 continues. Surely they are doing better than most carriers, but one has to wonder if they can pull off a few consecutive profitable quarters as they did in the past? I'd like to see it, and it very well may happen, but I think WN's entry into DEN...even though not significant...is something that could potentially prevent that from happening.

35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 22 hours ago) and read 4131 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well, we'll see.

The date on that link is October 28, and yes, it was covered here when that (surprising) profit was reported.

Mr. Potter's comment is:

"the enormous fuel price increases we have incurred" since Hurricane Katrina slammed the Gulf Coast and the refineries there in late August. He estimates the third quarter will show fuel cost per gallon 20 percent higher than in the second quarter.

Since then, of course, the price of fuel has dropped a bit. We'll see.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineAirTran737 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3702 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 22 hours ago) and read 4120 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The biggest question is how will the upcoming arrival of Southwest effect F9's balance sheet?


Nice Trip Report!!! Great Pics, thanks for posting!!!! B747Forever
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 22 hours ago) and read 4096 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AirTran737 (Reply 2):
The biggest question is how will the upcoming arrival of Southwest effect F9's balance sheet?

DEN/MDW has been an ATA route (Southwest codeshare) for a while - and yields are shot to hell there because of that - so that won't change much. In any case, Ted's arrival on that route did the greater damage there.

Similarly, DEN/PHX was already ATA/(Southwest) and DEN/LAS is not famous as high yield for Frontier. For anyone?

From Frontier's point of view, it is a very gentle - if inevitable - Southwest invasion.

 Smile

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 21 hours ago) and read 4071 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

If you have ever flown F9, and WN, you would think that F9 has nothing to worry about. While I enjoy flying Southwest I would prefer to fly Frontier, and would even pay a premium to do so.

User currently offlineIowaman From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4365 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 19 hours ago) and read 3933 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

The problem here is the WN name is known much more nationally than the F9 name, however I would imagine F9 is much more known in DEN. Also, WN is not going to just hurt yields from DEN to PHX/LAS/MDW, but to every city with available connections from those cities. WN had DEN- every city they fly to and where connections are available for $99 or less one way on DING! Sunday and all day Monday, and maybe even $79 if I remember right. That will put a dent in F9's yields. Good luck to both carriers.


Next flights: WN DSM-LAS-PHX, US PHX-SJD. Return: US SJD-PHX, WN PHX-MDW-DSM
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 18 hours ago) and read 3906 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Iowaman (Reply 5):
Also, WN is not going to just hurt yields from DEN to PHX/LAS/MDW, but to every city with available connections from those cities.

If you want to talk about connecting traffic, Frontier has been competing with Southwest for a long time.

MDW/SAN, for example. Or - I dunno - ABQ/BWI. Or - SCL/FLL. There are many more.

More crucially, the real low fare setter out of DEN - on one route - is not Southwest, but Northwest.

$99? $79? They should be so lucky. You can book DEN/MSP for $59 one way almost any time you want. I just checked it on Travelocity, again, for three different random dates.

It's been going on for a long time, and somehow Frontier survives it.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineSHUPirate1 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3670 posts, RR: 17
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 18 hours ago) and read 3873 times:

Quoting Mariner (Reply 6):
SCL/FLL

I don't think Southwest and Frontier are competing on that route at all. After all, do either of them even serve Santiago, Chile?  Silly

Edited to add smiley.

[Edited 2005-11-29 09:24:15]


Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
User currently offlineIRelayer From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 1073 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 17 hours ago) and read 3857 times:

Quoting Mariner (Reply 6):
MDW/SAN

The only reason I would fly F9 on this route would be for the PTV's as B6 does not fly to Chicago and Song does not fly from SAN. That said, F9 is consistently more expensive than WN on that route and WN offers 3 to 5 N/S in addition to the other routings...

-IR


User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 16 hours ago) and read 3833 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting SHUPirate1 (Reply 7):
After all, do either of them even serve Santiago, Chile?

Don't they? I am amazed.  wave 

Quoting IRelayer (Reply 8):
The only reason I would fly F9 on this route would be for the PTV's

Let's hear it for PTV's.

Quoting IRelayer (Reply 8):
F9 is consistently more expensive than WN on that route

That's good news, great for yields.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6520 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 3649 times:

Here's a new article talking about how Frontier could face a cash crunch:

http://yahoo.reuters.com/financeQuot...05-11-29_18-36-35_n29318909_newsml

I think it's vital for them to get more aircraft. They have a pretty sizeable operation for such a limited fleet.


User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 3610 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MSYtristar (Reply 10):
Here's a new article talking about how Frontier could face a cash crunch:

Um - that is the standard disclaimer that appears on every SEC filing, listing every possible negative that the company - any company - might face.

The reason the stock fell is becaue Frontier announced plans to sell $80 million in convertible bonds -

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/051129/frontier_airlines.html?.v=2

- underwritten by Morgan Stanley, which means the money is already there - and the warning was the standard disclaimer at the end of that filing.

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6520 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 3584 times:

Quoting Mariner (Reply 11):
Um - that is the standard disclaimer that appears on every SEC filing, listing every possible negative that the company - any company - might face

I realize that, but it contained some items of interest, so I posted it. No harm in that.


User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 13, posted (8 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 3572 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MSYtristar (Reply 12):
No harm in that.

I didn't say there was any harm in it. I was simply pointing out the facts of it for those who don't know.

And adding the info about Frontier raising $80 million.  Smile

cheers

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineAzstar From United States of America, joined May 2005, 617 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 3541 times:

Mariner reality check. Some people believe that F9 is a well managed, popular airline with a huge loyalty base. While Denver headquarters might contain a few of the brightest and best, the rest of the company is plagued with poor management, poor decision making, lack of planning, and many unmotivated personnel. And for those who believe that there is a large segment of the population who will pay a premium for advanced seat assignments and PTV, the truth is that 98% will not fly F9 if the fare is $1.00 higher than the competition. WN will probably cream F9 in Denver.

User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 15, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3509 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
Mariner reality check.

Your reality, perhaps, but not mine.

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
the rest of the company is plagued with poor management, poor decision making, lack of planning, and many unmotivated personnel.

Um - I'm not sure what major decisions are made outside of Denver, or what planning is done outside of there.

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
And for those who believe that there is a large segment of the population who will pay a premium for advanced seat assignments and PTV

Um - what premium? You mean DEN/MSP at $120 round trip?

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
WN will probably cream F9 in Denver.

They may indeed. I cannot predict the future. But I thought Ted was going to do that?

cheers

mariner

[Edited 2005-11-29 21:36:31]


aeternum nauta
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 16, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3497 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Mariner - Why do you get so defensive when someone posts anything remotely negative about Frontier? it is almost comical, anytime an F9 post comes up you seem to get in to a disagreement with one or more posters, and it always seems to come down to semantics. It's weird!

User currently offlineMSYtristar From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 6520 posts, RR: 51
Reply 17, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3494 times:

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
Some people believe that F9 is a well managed, popular airline with a huge loyalty base

No one can deny that the airline is very popular in Denver, but the same can't be said in other markets, since their market share is usually tiny at best with (at the most) limited local marketing.

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
While Denver headquarters might contain a few of the brightest and best, the rest of the company is plagued with poor management, poor decision making, lack of planning, and many unmotivated personnel.

During my three year tenure with F9, I witnessed a lot of what you have referred to. It was a mixed bag really. But it was no different than what went on at Vanguard when I was there. Pretty similar actually, but on a broader scale. It was a good company to work for, but every company has its problems.

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
And for those who believe that there is a large segment of the population who will pay a premium for advanced seat assignments and PTV

Regarding the PTV's, I sort of think would depend on the duration of the flight. They are not really used on a paid basis by many people on flights under two hours. But they come in handy for the longer transcons. It's a good novelty to have, but no, I wouldn't pay a premium for it. A book works for me.


User currently offlineRedFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4315 posts, RR: 28
Reply 18, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3482 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 16):
Mariner - Why do you get so defensive when someone posts anything remotely negative about Frontier? it is almost comical, anytime an F9 post comes up you seem to get in to a disagreement with one or more posters, and it always seems to come down to semantics. It's weird!

Following Mariner's previous posts on F9, which are always intelligently written with good analysis, I'd say he's got a ton of money tied up in the stock. Or, alternatively, he's got relatives working for F9.  cheerful 



I'm not a racist...I hate Biden, too.
User currently onlineByrdluvs747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2349 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3463 times:

Quoting Azstar (Reply 14):
WN will probably cream F9 in Denver.



Quoting Mariner (Reply 15):
They may indeed. I cannot predict the future. But I thought Ted was going to do that?

I have to agree with Mariner. Contrary to those who drink WN's brown koolaid. The presence of WN doesn't always mean the death of that hub'b prominent carrier. HP has proven time and time again that a carrier can compete with WN and still profit.

F9 offers a better product than WN. I would imagine that many business pax would chose F9 over WN if given a choice.



The 747: The hands who designed it were guided by god.
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 20, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3448 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting RedFlyer (Reply 18):
I'd say he's got a ton of money tied up in the stock.

Not at the moment - I only have about 200 shares. I have had many, many more, but I have bought and sold over the years.

I was very, very tempted to buy a big bunch this morning, on the drop - but I missed it. By the time I got my act together here, the stock has started to rebound.

 

cheers

mariner

[Edited 2005-11-29 22:08:45]


aeternum nauta
User currently offlineFlyGuyClt From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 537 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3430 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 16):
Mariner - Why do you get so defensive when someone posts anything remotely negative about Frontier? it is almost comical, anytime an F9 post comes up you seem to get in to a disagreement with one or more posters, and it always seems to come down to semantics. It's weird!

Or he suggests you say things you don't say. But, we won't go there. Best of luck to Frontier.

Quality Equipment.
Quality People.
Quality Product.

Safe Flying  

[Edited 2005-11-29 22:14:32]


Florida Express, Braniff II and ......
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25005 posts, RR: 85
Reply 22, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3419 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 16):
ariner - Why do you get so defensive when someone posts anything remotely negative about Frontier? it is almost comical, anytime an F9 post comes up you seem to get in to a disagreement with one or more posters, and it always seems to come down to semantics. It's weird!

Frontier is my hobby. And I like to keep the facts straight - there is a great deal of misinformation presented here, including on this thread.

Sorry if it offends you. It isn't going to change.

You could always ignore me.  Smile

cheers



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24834 posts, RR: 46
Reply 23, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3418 times:

At the end of the day, Frontier must develop some non Denver centered options. Having nearly all your eggs in a single hub has always been risky. Going forward anyways Denver can only absorb limited additional growth due to gate availability limits the carrier faces.

Whether Frontier should continue its Mexico build up, add significant point to point flying, or develop several focus cities are debatable, however non Denver centric options must be pursued if the company wishes to grow.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9603 posts, RR: 69
Reply 24, posted (8 years 8 months 5 hours ago) and read 3387 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

No, no need to ignore, I was just curious. You were one of the reasons I decided to give F9 a shot, after 12 segements in 5 weeks I am very happy with their service. I only wish they flew to more of the places I need to travel...

25 MAH4546 : I've been hearing latley that there might be an announcement within a month or two regarding two new destinations, both in the southern US. Any one he
26 Post contains links Flashmeister : Some people believe that F9 is a well managed, popular airline with a huge loyalty base. Well, some of these "some people" include a number of Wall St
27 N471WN : The smartest thing that F9 could now do is establish a presence in COS......WN should have gone in there but since they did not then F9 needs to pick
28 Flashmeister : The smartest thing that F9 could now do is establish a presence in COS......WN should have gone in there but since they did not then F9 needs to pick
29 N471WN : From Flashmeister:....."and more importantly, their "experiment" failed and they went bankrupt, remember?" Yes I do but they went downhill after they
30 PHXinterrupted : Yeah, if you call losing money competing.
31 Mariner : Hmm? I'm sorry, I don't understand. Frontier is profitable for their financial year. This may or may not continue, but I can't predict the future. ch
32 MattMSP767 : I love all of your posts - You're a smart guy...people should take note from you.
33 Hillbilliescot : I know West Pac would be huge right now. I wouldn't doubt it if West Pac would be flying international if they were still around. Since the demise of
34 Flashmeister : they went downhill after they went into Denver. My sources tell me that if they had stayed at COS they would have survived. This isn't the case. Weste
35 Azstar : TUS is 110 miles from PHX airport, and loses over 1 million passengers per year to PHX. COS probably loses considerably more to DEN due its proximity
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Luxair To Post Loss For 2005 posted Mon Feb 6 2006 16:04:54 by RJ100
Whoa! JetBlue To Post Loss Next Quarter posted Thu Oct 28 2004 22:01:22 by JetBluefan1
DL To Post A 2bln Loss posted Thu Oct 20 2005 19:31:23 by Jetjack74
ATA Continues To Post Monthly Loss. posted Sat Jul 2 2005 07:51:34 by Laxintl
DL Expected To Report 1Q $670M Loss posted Tue Apr 19 2005 23:52:06 by Dl757md
Ryanair To Post First Ever Quarterly Loss posted Fri Apr 2 2004 11:25:13 by BestWestern
Iata Expected To Reveal $7 Billion Loss 4 Industry posted Wed Oct 10 2001 19:51:35 by Singapore_Air
BA To Post £200 Million Loss This Year posted Thu Apr 6 2000 22:01:55 by Mas777
Aeropostal Expected To Announce FLL; NK Codeshare posted Sat Nov 18 2006 22:49:05 by MAH4546
Length Of Time For Miles To Post To A FFacct posted Mon Oct 16 2006 05:37:08 by ASTROJET707