Although the US-Mexico air treaty was recently liberalized to allow up to three US and three Mexican airlines per US-Mexico route, this rule only applies to select resort destinations. Guadalajara is still a 2-carrier route. ASA's application approval, however, is not assured, even though this might just seem like a "simple" switch from mainline to connection. Since Delta and ASA are still seperate airlines, Delta must give-up their LAX-GDL route authority, they can't just transfer it to ASA. Therefore, any other US airline is able to apply for this route, which is the fourth busiest US-Mexico city pair, after Miami-Mexico City, New York City-Mexico City, and Los Angeles-Mexico City.
N1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 27242 posts, RR: 74
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 11 hours ago) and read 3979 times:
Quoting CALMSP (Reply 1): I would lvoe it if we kept building our LAX operation!! maybe we could jump in on it!!
Given the population of GDL natives in the Los Angeles area, I don't know why anyone would use an RJ on the route. I would like to see United, American or Frontier pick the route up with mainline aircraft.
Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Laxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26674 posts, RR: 50
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 11 hours ago) and read 3929 times:
Per mention in the application unless DOT grants the exempted authority to ASA specifically, DL will not be dropping the route and would continue to operate a single flight with its presently held authority.
Flying LAX-GDL with a CRJ is kinda nuts anyways, especially considering the high volume of baggage the route would produce.
Poor Delta tough.. I dont think they have a clue as to what they want to do in Mexico. First they destroy much of old Western's few remaining routes, then they apply for a slew of new city pairs like LAX-CZM, and now are back in the retrenching mode again.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California