Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Jetblue JFK Construction To Start!  
User currently offlineWerdywerd From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 582 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7033 times:

Jetblue just announced that the Terminal 5 demolition and construction of a new 635,000 square-foot 26-gate terminal will begin this month! It will be able to handle 250+ flights a day. Parking garage, airtrain connector and new roadways will also be built. 30-Year lease has been signed with PANYNJ.

7 temporary gates will be added to Terminal 6 in the meantime to handle immediate growth by early 2006.

They will have a ceremony and media event on Dec. 7th where the blueprints for the new terminal will be made public.

Slated to be ready by early 2009.

 Smile

104 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTommy767 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 6584 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7029 times:

Awesome! is there a link?

tommy in EWR/LAX.



"Folks that's the news and I'm outta here!" -- Dennis Miller
User currently offlineWerdywerd From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 582 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7026 times:

No public link yet. Wait until after Dec 7th.

User currently offlineWerdywerd From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 582 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 7023 times:

Whoops, scratch that. A quick google search produced this:

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7001254397


User currently offlineJetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2988 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 6827 times:

Yes! Finally! JetBlue has had this up their sleeves for quite awhile and have contantly found things to hold them back. But finally, it's happening!

BTW, is there a launch date for the 7-gate addition to T6? Because that's more near-term that really interests me more.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 6814 times:

Wow, that is some news. I hope they make a nice parking garage so I can shoot from the top of it!  camera 

User currently offlineRAMPRAT980 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 600 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 6797 times:

Does Jet Blue use the old TWA building ?


With gun control there can be no democracy.. With gun control there can be no Freedom
User currently offlineMarkATL From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 539 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 6761 times:

Quoting Tommy767 (Reply 1):
Awesome!

What's so "awesome!" about it? Although I do like and fly JetBlue I don't understand all the hype. It will be an airline terminal, but they'll lay some blue carpet, eveyone will munch on some blue potato chips and watch some TV. Then the whole crowd will act like the the little rubber space alien dolls in "Toy Story" going "ohhh ahhh, take me to your leader".


[Edited 2005-12-03 18:01:35]


"...left my home in Georgia, 'n headed for the "Frisco" Bay...
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16878 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 6722 times:

Quoting RAMPRAT980 (Reply 6):
Does Jet Blue use the old TWA building ?

The Port Authority owns T-5, T-6. B6 is a tenant with a long term lease.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineAwysBSB From Brazil, joined Sep 2005, 561 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 6631 times:

If have created this thread I would have named it as “Jetblue absurd construction is to start”.
I just cannot understand how so many people get enthusiastic with an immature terminal project!
Currently, T5 satellites can have more than 26 gates and there is a parking lot area to T5 expand, following a similar model of the T6`s.
I have to tell you I am disappointed with my fellow citizen whom is managing this absurd, Mr. David Neeleman.
“Rotonga”, or the star-sized satellite, and the “747 gates”, or the guitar-sized satellite, were designed by Eero Saarinen (in 1952) and Kevin Roche & John Dinkeloo (in 1967), respectively, and have a more organic architecture than several of the last concourses built in new airports.
I hope someday many of you have the sensibility to analyze what were lost, so other important things in aviation will not be destroyed in the future.


User currently offlineCrogalski From United States of America, joined May 2005, 514 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 6590 times:

Quoting MarkATL (Reply 7):
What's so "awesome!" about it? Although I do like and fly JetBlue I don't understand all the hype. It will be an airline terminal, but they'll lay some blue carpet, eveyone will munch on some blue potato chips and watch some TV. Then the whole crowd will act like the the little rubber space alien dolls in "Toy Story" going "ohhh ahhh, take me to your leader".

Have you ever been in T6 during a busy season?

Quoting AwysBSB (Reply 9):
If have created this thread I would have named it as “Jetblue absurd construction is to start”.
I just cannot understand how so many people get enthusiastic with an immature terminal project!
Currently, T5 satellites can have more than 26 gates and there is a parking lot area to T5 expand, following a similar model of the T6`s.
I have to tell you I am disappointed with my fellow citizen whom is managing this absurd, Mr. David Neeleman.
“Rotonga”, or the star-sized satellite, and the “747 gates”, or the guitar-sized satellite, were designed by Eero Saarinen (in 1952) and Kevin Roche & John Dinkeloo (in 1967), respectively, and have a more organic architecture than several of the last concourses built in new airports.
I hope someday many of you have the sensibility to analyze what were lost, so other important things in aviation will not be destroyed in the future.

Whoopdedoo, do you want the terminal to be used as is? with all of the asbestos and all of the other stuff in there? Yes, it is a landmark.. but right now, it's a complete waste of space in my opnion, it's not used, only B6 uses it to park aircraft. Times change, and I think this will be good for both JetBlue and JFK.



A319 A320 B717 B727 B737 B747 B757 B767 C152 C172 DC9 E145 E190 MD88 PA28 | B6 CO DL FL NK NW LO TW
User currently offlineAA767400 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2369 posts, RR: 26
Reply 11, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 6569 times:

Correct me if I wrong, but were they not going to keep the orginal terminal, and just tear down the back portion of the structure?


"The low fares airline."
User currently offlineWerdywerd From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 582 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 6533 times:

Quoting AA767400 (Reply 11):
Correct me if I wrong, but were they not going to keep the orginal terminal, and just tear down the back portion of the structure?

Yes, the front "bird like" structure will remain untouched. The rear will be demolished and rebuilt.

Here is an artists rendition from a while back:

http://www.aia.org/aiarchitect/thisweek04/tw0820/0820jetblue_b.jpg


User currently offlineAA767400 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 2369 posts, RR: 26
Reply 13, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 6517 times:

Now that is awesome! Keeping the classic front, well having a modern terminal in the back. Very nice!  smile 


"The low fares airline."
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26540 posts, RR: 75
Reply 14, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 6516 times:

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 12):
Yes, the front "bird like" structure will remain untouched. The rear will be demolished and rebuilt.

Here is an artists rendition from a while back:

That looks really good actually. I think Eero would be proud



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4506 posts, RR: 34
Reply 15, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 6501 times:

IIRC, the politically-powerful historic-preservation interests in NYC threw a fit when expansion for the T5 area was mentioned a few years ago. Whether the Port Authority was planning to tear down T5 or not I don't know, but that is prime real estate in an extremely busy airport. Making it useful to a major, growing tenant is IMO the first and foremost consideration.

Fortunately, as the well-known image posted by Werdywerd shows, PANYNJ did find a way to accomodate the most historically valuable part of T5, and still get a functional updated design. This is IMO a better idea than keeping the bug-like original concourses which probably would be expensive to preserve, and probably less efficient in use of apron space and for passenger circulation. The new design can probably accomodate moving sidewalks if needed, too.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineRAMPRAT980 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 600 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 6447 times:

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 12):
Yes, the front "bird like" structure will remain untouched. The rear will be demolished and rebuilt.

Looks very impressive but I think they will outgrow it and need more space quickly



With gun control there can be no democracy.. With gun control there can be no Freedom
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26540 posts, RR: 75
Reply 17, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 6425 times:

Quoting RAMPRAT980 (Reply 16):
Looks very impressive but I think they will outgrow it and need more space quickly

Aren't they going to use both terminals?



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4506 posts, RR: 34
Reply 18, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 6392 times:

Ramprat--I think this building should hold JetBlue for awhile. Its 26 gates plus 16 in T6 gives B6 44 gates. At a rate of 10 turns per gate per day, that would allow 440 dailies. IIRC, they're not even at 200 dailies from JFK yet (someone correct me if wrong). That should buy B6 several years, I think.

Your observation points to one less-than-ideal fact of the situation. The Saarinen building, according to JFK experts in our past threads was not suitable to use as a main terminal for several reasons. Keeping it meant pushing the new terminal back (by my estimate) several hundred feet from the existing roadway, to clear it around the back.

That probably cost at least 10, maybe 15 gate positions in the configuration of the new terminal. Were the new terminal located where T5 is, it could probably have had a second outward-projecting concourse where the linear concourse at the foreground of the photo is. The one at the end of the triangular section also could have been longer. So there is a practical cost to keeping T5.

Jim



Need a new airline paint scheme? Better call Saul! (Bass that is)
User currently offlineJetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2988 posts, RR: 14
Reply 19, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 6331 times:

Quoting DCA-ROCguy (Reply 18):
Its 26 gates plus 16 in T6 gives B6 44 gates

Actually it'll just be the 26 gates at T5; T6 will be torn down (if I have my facts straight).

In any case, the plan will call for 26 gates, but they do have both the ability and blueprints for an additional 10 gates.

JetBluefan1



Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2092 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6319 times:

Most critics feel that the new construction will leave the Saarinen check-in area to wilt and die, because nobody will want to go through there, they would go to the main terminal behind it. It would just sit there like a white elephant. Does anyone know what the passenger flow would be through the terminal?

User currently offlineRJpieces From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6306 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 20):
Does anyone know what the passenger flow would be through the terminal?

Who knows. They might make it a restaurant, or museum. I think I remember reading that there will be B6 checkin there.

That photo is absolutely gorgeous. But what will be where T6 is now? That picture makes it look like the new terminal will be entirely on the old T5 ramp.

Perhaps the PANYNJ should consider building a midfield concourse when T6 is knocked down?


User currently offlineWerdywerd From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 582 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6284 times:

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 20):
Does anyone know what the passenger flow would be through the terminal?

Last I heard, the checkin kiosks will be located in the Saarinen building in front, if you don't want to use the kiosks, you still have to walk through the old structure and through to the new terminal via the multiple tubes you see pictured above. The rear roadway will be for arrivals only, front roadway is departures.


User currently offlineBigdrewfl From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 6250 times:

Quoting RJpieces (Reply 21):
Quoting AADC10 (Reply 20):
Does anyone know what the passenger flow would be through the terminal?

Who knows. They might make it a restaurant, or museum. I think I remember reading that there will be B6 checkin there.

That photo is absolutely gorgeous. But what will be where T6 is now? That picture makes it look like the new terminal will be entirely on the old T5 ramp.

Perhaps the PANYNJ should consider building a midfield concourse when T6 is knocked down?

The plan calls for T6 to be "knocked down" and T5 will be eventually be expanded to a 36 gate terminal.


User currently offlineAwysBSB From Brazil, joined Sep 2005, 561 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 6244 times:

Quoting Crogalski (Reply 10):
do you want the terminal to be used as is? with all of the asbestos and all of the other stuff in there?

How would T5 be used, if TWA was still flying?

Quoting N1120A (Reply 14):
I think Eero would be proud

In my opinion the proud ones must be the B6`s and the PA`s people, since they think they have right of destroying a landmark.

Quoting DCA-ROCguy (Reply 15):
Fortunately, as the well-known image posted by Werdywerd shows, PANYNJ did find a way to accomodate the most historically valuable part of T5, and still get a functional updated design.

This idea of transforming Eero Saarinen building into a museum just makes a waste of space!
If that terminal was converted into a baggage claim building and a new check-in building was created in front of the former one (on the parking lot), the whole Eero Saarinen terminal would be appropriately used and its airside area would keep as big as it is.
JetBlue is just throwing its money away and that shows their inexperience with an upstart mentality.

Quoting AADC10 (Reply 20):
Does anyone know what the passenger flow would be through the terminal?

The common passengers will face the Eero Saarinen building as an obstacle between the parking lot and T5.


25 N1120A : But they will then expand into the area where T6 is
26 Werdywerd : From the info I have, T6 will be torn down and a parking structure will be built in its place.
27 JetBluefan1 : Not to be rude but...get a grip. The landmark isn't being destroyed! Right now T5's sitting there with absolutely no use. The whole check-in area and
28 Kahala777 : Huh? Please elaborate! Seriously, you need to take a trip to the United States and see the crap heap that T5 has become, most of which was due to TWA
29 Post contains links Concentriq : http://www.wirednewyork.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5301
30 STT757 : T-6 will be torn down, a aircraft hard stand area will take it's place. An LCC even with the phenomenal growth of B6 has no use for more than 26 gate
31 Incitatus : I feel obligated to disagree with your perspective. New York is a very large metropolis. It is very difficult to go through all the hoops to do somet
32 JetBluefan1 : Well said, indeed. As a Long Islander I completely agree - real estate is so expensive here and yet there is so little supply. Queens simply cannot a
33 Mir : T5, beautiful as it is, was designed a long time ago, and is no longer suitable for use as a terminal on its own (due mostly to security requirements
34 Post contains links Flashmeister : Some good, recent shots of the interior of Terminal 5 are available on Flickr. See here and here.[Edited 2005-12-04 07:14:52]
35 RAMPRAT980 : nice pics Flashmeister
36 AwysBSB : OK, TVs, new planes and leather seats are for competitiveness. However, there is no competition for acquiring T5 in JFK. I do not know why B6 does no
37 Mir : #1: Because B6 doesn't completely imitate WN. It's not their business model. They have assigned seating, IFE, two types of planes, etc. #2: Because t
38 STT757 : The Port Authority's long term plan is to reduce the number of Terminals at JFK to 5, 9 was way too many. It's way to costly to heat, air condition,
39 Mir : Agreed, absolutely. But why build a parking garage on space that could be used to expand the new T5 towards where T6 was (or expand T7 in that direct
40 STT757 : Who ever said a "car" parking garage is wrong, they are going to build an aircraft hardstand parking area. JFK has alot of aircraft sitting around mo
41 RJpieces : Indeed. That is why it bothers me when people talk about building new airports for NYC, or expanding Stewart. JFK still has plenty of room. Even this
42 MarshalN : The Saarinen building has needed a revamp for a long time. It was great when it was built, but really, it's not very functional in this day and age. I
43 AwysBSB : I would be thankful if you specified the confusion of my logic. The point I was defending is that B6 should acquire other hubs (maybe STL, MEM, CVG o
44 JetBluefan1 : Of course it's important to have knowledge of the tri-state market! Terminal 5 is sitting on prime real estate yet it is taking in no revenue. Queens
45 STT757 : Terminal One only has 11 gates, the Port Authority should expand T-4 from 16 gates to 27 and consolidate the Terminal One airlines to T-4. Then move
46 JetBluefan1 : Once again, you show no knowledge of the Tri-state market. There is so much untapped potential it's ridiculous. JetBlue will exploit that potential.
47 STT757 : Queens County is irrelevant because it's the City that collects the taxes, also the Port Authority is exempt from Local City and State Taxes which is
48 Post contains images RiddlePilot215 : If you ask me B6 reaks of reminance of People's Express..... I'm not making predictions, but I think we all know what their history was ::cough cough
49 JetBluefan1 : Thanks for that clearing up. It's quite interesting that there's a New York Port Authority yet other airports in other cities are owned directly by th
50 TUNisia : A lot of the armchair CEOs here have no idea of the importance behind T5.
51 JetBluefan1 : You said the key word: American culture. Our culture has dramatically changed since Terminal 5 was opened and new technology has evolved, standards h
52 STT757 : There's no New York Port Authority, there's the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. It's a Bi-State agency exempt from local/State taxes, Zoni
53 Bigdrewfl : You have it all wrong, the main terminal building stays they same!!! I used to fly TWA out of T5 and it was such a great feeling to walk up and down
54 Post contains images AwysBSB : Kahala777 and JetBluefan1, You both should make a duet! Anyway, not supporting any Queens` or Tri-state`s localism, I think any airline should be car
55 Post contains images JerseyGuy : Where's that? But seriously, airlines have tried midwest hubs like AA/TWA in St. Louis, Midwest Express (Now midwest Airlines) at Omaha, they don't w
56 Mir : Name some that aren't already overrun with LCCs. B6 doesn't like to go head to head with other LCCs at their own hubs (with the possible exception of
57 JetBluefan1 : Of course any airline should be careful when investing in JFK. I completely agree! But any airline show be careful when investing in any city. Money
58 JerseyGuy : Does any one know what the plans are for food and restrooms in the new terminal 5? Terminal 6 is a little laking in those regards. Speaking of which a
59 Werdywerd : Don't think we are really lacking in the restroom department, there are plenty! 2 mens and 2 womens in the departure bldg. before TSA checkpoint, and
60 RiddlePilot215 : If by efficient you mean bland, uninteresting, unoriginal, tacky, and more industrial looking, then by all means I don't want to major in airport man
61 Post contains images JerseyGuy : 1 next to each gate? I must be hallucinating or thinking of another terminal. Glad to hear of the improvements at the food court. **Edited to add tha
62 JetBluefan1 : I don't understand what your point is. How's efficiency any of those? In case you didn't see the sketch of the new building (reply 12), it will be ve
63 Bigdrewfl : Correct! Cheburger CheBurger is coming to T6 with in the next 2-3 weeks. I don't really know what happened but there was supposed to be a Wendy's com
64 Mir : Alright, what's your alternative? The Saarinen building can't be a terminal on its own anymore - that much we know. B6 also needs a bigger terminal t
65 JFKLGANYC : I think its a good plan. While I always liked the TWA terminal and still think it can be used (it was in use until OCT 2001) it does need major work .
66 AwysBSB : You cannot accuse that I have no argumentation just because my point of view is divergent of yours. All the comments about the new T5 I have posted i
67 ToTheStars : I think jetBlue is really a hip and innovative airline, much like TWA was in the 60's and 70's. As a former TWA flight attendant, I am glad that they
68 FA4B6 : Are you crazy? Love or hate JetBlue, it's pretty common knowledge that JetBlue is maxed out at T6 and needs a much larger space at JFK because T6 is
69 Gigneil : No, it won't. To get access to T5, you go through the Saarinen building. No it can't, and yes they do. That's point people above are trying to make.
70 Mir : Ok, here are the alternatives you referred to: Your proposals wouldn't work, for several reasons: - Converting the Saarinen building to a baggage cla
71 Revelation : Q: Why do bank robbers rob banks? A: Because that's where the money is!
72 JetBluefan1 : Exactly. JetBlue is 'attacking' in NYC because that's one helluva bank! JetBluefan1
73 JFKLGANYC : MEDIA ADVISORY - CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ON SPECTACULAR NEW $875 MILLION PASSENGER TERMINAL AT JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Date: December 05, 20
74 Werdywerd : FYI The time was changed to 11:30 am earlier today.
75 AwysBSB : Converting the Saarinen building to a baggage claim building is so feasible that it constitutes one of the projects the projects that were proposed f
76 Crogalski : Just a quick question, are you going to be standing outside T5 tomorrow and protesting with a sign saying "JetBlue Go Home" or something?
77 Post contains images AwysBSB : The situation does not require me to make such an annoyance! I do believe the reality is dialectic and that the things done (be wrong or right) by so
78 Post contains images JetBlueAtJFK : WHAT! Anyway, I think this whole project it great and they will get a lot of new opportunities for more flights. I was at JFK on Friday and Sunday an
79 Mir : Any links to one of the proposals? I would be very surprised if that were the case. Excavating UNDER T5 to build this underground gallery would be di
80 AwysBSB : Ask this to Port Authority, they must make the things they do clear to everyone. So are you suggesting they are not clear? No, it would not. You must
81 Post contains images JetBlueAtJFK : Again, I don't understand what that is supposed to mean. Are you trying to say ask the PANYNJ because they make things clear??????? jetBlueAtJFK
82 Mir : No specific press releases on the Port Authority website. They're generally not too good about informing people about proposals. If you tell me where
83 Post contains links AwysBSB : An entity like Port Authority has to justify for the society the things they do. Here is a link which shows there are alternatives for JFK`s T5. MAS
84 Post contains links and images Mir : Ok, so you're referring to this: I believe that that was a possibility back when B6 and UA were going to build a terminal together (they used to shar
85 Post contains images AwysBSB : Why disfiguring the things I write? You must have not read the descriptions I made, because I was not referring to the possibility you showed. That i
86 Mir : I know it didn't match the description, but that was the image on the webpage that you linked, as quoted below: If you want me to look at the proposa
87 JetBluefan1 : And I'm one of them! I see this project as a great thing for the New York economy - plenty of jobs to construct the terminal as well as additional fl
88 AwysBSB : It is great you spent some time last night looking for that link, but I have not asked you to look at or analyze the proposal I mentioned, because th
89 JerseyGuy : You've made a statement that this was one of the alternatives for T5 and now YOU, not the Port Authority, have to prove that this is true.
90 Post contains links and images STT757 : Here's the latest rendering:
91 AwysBSB : That new terminal is an offense to creativity! Its building is tall of size, but low in significance.[Edited 2005-12-08 01:32:11]
92 Post contains images Mir : Not showing up for me Your description of the alternative is something that I have never heard of before, and I've kept an ear out for stuff going on
93 Flypdx : I think it is really cool! It looks very modern for an airline that is very modern. Buildings get knocked down all of the time, there comes a time wh
94 Post contains links STT757 : Try this link; http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4536/1880/1600/jetblue.jpg
95 Post contains images Mir : I get an "access denied" message. -Mir
96 Post contains links STT757 : I hope this works otherwise Im out of ideas. http://enplaned.blogspot.com/2005/12/be-afraid-be-very-afraid.html
97 Post contains links STT757 : Here's some old Terminal 5 photos, http://www.jetsetmodern.com/twa.htm
98 AwysBSB : I assure you that the alternative I described is so foreseeable as the others you might have heard about. Fell free when doing that! Remember that an
99 Mir : It works! Thanks. Which means not very, I guess. -Mir
100 Post contains images Lightsaber : Beautiful! Love it! While the old design was pretty, its just not large enough to be functional. As to worrying about alternatives... the PA has been
101 JFKLGANYC : Hey, will the famous departure boards in the old terminal start functioning again to display B6 flight info???? I sure hope so . . . they were my favo
102 Post contains images Mir : One thing I've realized - all that flat roof space would be perfect for an observation deck. But it probably won't happen.... -Mir
103 Markatl : I wasn't saying that JestBlue doesn't need a new terminal. I was only referring to how some of the JetBlue fans around here act like a horny teenage
104 Post contains links and images STT757 : Here's some more renderings; http://www.gensler.com/practices/airports_transits/jetblue.html
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
PVD Rail Station Construction To Start Soon posted Mon Feb 13 2006 22:23:59 by PVD757
Jetblue JFK - BOS Flights Start In 2 DAY! posted Sun Nov 6 2005 07:46:12 by Bigdrewfl
JFK Airtrain To Start Dec. 17th posted Tue Dec 9 2003 06:07:27 by Bombayhog
JetBlue To Start JFK-BNA posted Tue Jun 6 2006 14:26:19 by MrSTL
JetBlue To Start JFK-PDX, Add 2nd Daily SEA-JFK posted Wed Feb 23 2005 16:05:38 by TOLtommy
JetBlue To Start 3rd Daily Flight JFK-SAN-JFK posted Mon Jul 14 2003 21:55:51 by Lindy field
Why Did DL Have To Pay UA To Start LGW-JFK Route? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 22:33:30 by Gilesdavies
Jetblue To Start Seasonal BOS - SJU posted Tue Sep 26 2006 18:13:49 by B6FA4ever
Rumor:AA To Start 2nd Daily JFK-EZE posted Thu Sep 14 2006 15:40:43 by NYCAAer
AA To Start JFK-SJD posted Wed Jul 26 2006 18:50:18 by BigGSFO