Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Skymark B767 Suffers Uncontained Engine Failure  
User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3012 times:

Hey,

Just found this:

Read Full Story: http://aviation-safety.net/news/newsitem.php?id=1537

Quote:
After landing a 1.5-meter-long, 20- to 60-centimeter hole was discovered in the engine.

Now, ^ that must be unusual. What could've caused that?

Thanks
Mike

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCloudyapple From Hong Kong, joined Jul 2005, 2454 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2969 times:

A fan blade coming out at an angle.


A310/A319/20/21/A332/3/A343/6/A388/B732/5/7/8/B742/S/4/B752/B763/B772/3/W/E145/J41/MD11/83/90
User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2922 times:

ahh, ok thanks.

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21515 posts, RR: 60
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2877 times:

Quoting Dogfighter2111 (Thread starter):
Now, ^ that must be unusual. What could've caused that?

it's why fuselages are reinforced in line with the engines with a missing window, so if a blade flies off uncontained, it hits a strong part of the plane and doesn't fly through a window or something.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2858 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 3):

Therefore not causing decompression?

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlineCCA From Hong Kong, joined Oct 2002, 831 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2740 times:

Here's another article with a pic.

http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/nation...news/20051202p2a00m0na016000c.html



C152 G115 TB10 CAP10 SR-22 Be76 PA-34 NDN-1T C500 A330-300 A340-300 -600 B747-200F -200SF -400 -400F -400BCF -400ERF -8F
User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2712 times:

Quoting CCA (Reply 5):

Great, thanks. Isn't that a bit far back for a Fan Blade to cause that damage?

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 970 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2650 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 3):
it's why fuselages are reinforced in line with the engines with a missing window, so if a blade flies off uncontained, it hits a strong part of the plane and doesn't fly through a window or something.

I believe you are mistaken. Missing windows are usually related to AC ducts, not engine placement. Because aircon packs are usually in the wing root area, the "missing windows" are often close to engine pylons, but not precisely aligned with anything in particular.

It's simply coincidence. If an engine failed, engineers would have no way to know if uncontained debris will strike on window or another:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Les Rickman
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gerry Stegmeier



Quoting Dogfighter2111 (Reply 4):
Therefore not causing decompression?

If the fuselage is punctured, decompression (to varying degree) will occur. Window reinforcements are designed to keep a local failure from weaking the surrounding structure. A "rip stop" if you will.

The "missing windows" however, are not localized reinforcement to protect from an engine failure.


User currently offlineDrDeke From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 830 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2637 times:

Looks to me like it would have had to have been a turbine blade. Probably the low-pressure turbine judging from that picture.

-DrDeke



If you don't want it known, don't say it on a phone.
User currently offlineMiamiair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2619 times:

Quoting DrDeke (Reply 8):
The "missing windows" however, are not localized reinforcement to protect from an engine failure.

You are correct.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Uncontained Engine Failure On F100, MD-80, Etc posted Thu Apr 4 2002 19:39:13 by AM744
Contained & Uncontained Engine Failure posted Thu Jun 21 2001 04:20:46 by Trickijedi
Pratt & Whitney Sued Because Of Engine Failure posted Tue Aug 22 2006 21:01:09 by RoseFlyer
BA Avoids Prosecution For Engine Failure Flight posted Fri Aug 11 2006 01:35:55 by PhilSquares
773/77W - Un-contained Engine Failure Question posted Wed May 10 2006 09:44:24 by Orlando666
SAA Engine Failure posted Sun Jan 29 2006 00:26:56 by Soups
Air Canada A330 W. Engine Failure Diverted To KEF posted Sun Dec 4 2005 17:55:05 by Asgeirs
Ryanair Birdstrike And Engine Failure posted Sat Sep 3 2005 12:51:44 by Drinkstrolley
Crashes Due To Engine Failure posted Wed Jun 15 2005 11:15:21 by TepidHalibut
Engine Failure? No Problem If You Fly Kulula! posted Fri Jun 10 2005 10:58:25 by Euclid