Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lufthansa A340-300 Vs A330-300  
User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7058 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 10612 times:

Since Lufthansa was a late A330 customer I was wondering will the A330-300 replace much of the older A340-300s ?
I believe that the A330 is a better plane to be used on routes like FRA-EWR or FRA-JFK and other destinations at the US east coast than the A340-300.
Will the A330 make the A340 obsolete on these routes. The A340 is fine on longer routes that can not be served with the A330-300 e.g. the West Coast and Asia but these routes also see the A340-600 and 747-400.
Will LH phase out some of their A340-300s soon as long as they can sell them for a good price. LH has a very good history of selling their aircrafts to a very good price.
I believe one A340 was taken over by Namibia some weeks ago, don´t know if this was an ex Sabena or Swiss aircraft.

Sorry if this has been discused before....

[Edited 2005-12-04 15:45:04]


It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 10565 times:

First, the A340s going to Air Namibia are ex-Sabena aircraft (very early build A343s) that LH had been leasing due to a shortage of longhaul equipment. LH is also flying a handful of ex-SN A332s that will eventually leave the fleet.

LH was late in acquiring a longhaul highcapacity twin jet....the A333s have taken over some routes that were once flown by the A343s and are now regulars on services from Germany to the US. LH is a large A346 operator, with more of the type on order, and the A346 has replaced 742s and A343s on some routes. While it is true that the A343 is being squeezed on both ends by newer models, the A333 on side and the A346 on the other, I strongly think that the type will remain in the LH fleet for many years to come flying lower demand longhaul routes and some tranatlantic type routes. LH is not likely to add to its A343 fleet, but the current fleet is rather young, has many years of flying left, and while the A343 sometimes takes some abuse here at a.net, its a very versatile airliner. The A343 is a good choice to launch new routes out of LH's developing Munich hub for example.

LH has phased out its A342s in recent years....these were early build examples and the A343, with its extra 32 seats, simply makes more sense for the missions that the first generation A340s fly for LH.


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7058 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 10502 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 1):
While it is true that the A343 is being squeezed on both ends by newer models, the A333 on side and the A346 on the other, I strongly think that the type will remain in the LH fleet for many years to come flying lower demand longhaul routes and some tranatlantic type routes. LH is not likely to add to its A343 fleet, but the current fleet is rather young, has many years of flying left, and while the A343 sometimes takes some abuse here at a.net, its a very versatile airliner. The A343 is a good choice to launch new routes out of LH's developing Munich hub for example.

First of all I think the A340 is a great looking aircraft and my favorite airliner around, I know about the abuse here on a.net but that was not what I had in mind as I was I opening this thread.
I also do believe that the A340 will stay in LHs fleet for awhile but as you said it is squeezed on both ends. Lufthansa seems to be more than satisfied with the operation costs and performance of the A330.
I was not saying that LH will replace all its A340-300s with A340-600s and A330s. But due to the fact that LH has 29 A340-300s (the largest operator of that type I believe) I was wondering if it would not make sense for LH to replace some of their A343s with A333s.
The idea of replacing some A343s with A333s came to my mind some weeks ago as I was reading that Lufthansa will change their New York flights from Frankfurt from A340 to A330. Since I travelled a lot on these flights on A340s andregarding that these are at least 2 or 3 daily flights from FRA to JFK and EWR I was wondering what they will do with the A340s being used there before.
What I forgot while posting is that LH wants to expand from MUC so that is where the A340s will go.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineIMatAMS From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 317 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10313 times:

If indeed those 2 ex-sabena 343's are gone it's a very wise thing to do for LH I think. Those aircraft were really good to scare people away to the competition. I had the 'pleasure' of being on them FRA-YVR and back and they made me avoid LH if I can..

User currently offlineJetMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10294 times:

Quoting IMatAMS (Reply 3):
I had the 'pleasure' of being on them FRA-YVR and back and they made me avoid LH if I can..

How exactly were they worse than any of LH's regular sub-standard equipped aircraft?


Regards,
JM


User currently offlinePM From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 6870 posts, RR: 63
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10278 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 1):
The A343 is a good choice to launch new routes out of LH's developing Munich hub for example.

I had to go to China last week (LH 744 FRA-PEK) and among my return options were LH with an A343 from PEK to MUC. Alas, I had to change my plans and come home from Japan where I also missed an LH A346 from Osaka. (I got a 9-abreast and noisy KLM 772ER instead.)

But that kind of route - MUC-PEK-MUC - is surely where the A343 still scores over the A333. Could an A333 do that route?


User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10241 times:

The A343 is inefficient on short/medium routes but efficient on long routes. The A333 is efficient on short/medium but can't do long routes. So maybe LH will replace the A343 on routes such as NYC, and then expand with or sell the replaced A343's.

User currently offlineAY104 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 505 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 10234 times:

I thought - correct me if I am wrong - that from a customer service standpoint, ie comfort, size of cabin etc, that the A330 and A340 were identical except for the number of engines. I know some airlines, for example SAS have the identical number of seats/configuration for both aircraft. I also flew on both with Air Canada, and the only difference other that the number of engines was that the J-class section on the A330 was a few rows larger. I realize the difference in range between the 2, but as far as comfort goes they are the same. The A330 does LHR YVR nonstop, that is about 9 1/2 hrs, and I imagine more economical that the A340.


The only thing a customer should expect for his/her loyalty is good service
User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7058 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 10074 times:

Quoting RJ111 (Reply 6):
The A343 is inefficient on short/medium routes but efficient on long routes. The A333 is efficient on short/medium but can't do long routes. So maybe LH will replace the A343 on routes such as NYC, and then expand with or sell the replaced A343's.

That was exactly my idea. The A333 is more efficient than the A343 on some routes that have been served or are now served with the A343.
Of course there are some routes that need the range of the A343 and don´t justify the extra capacity of the A346 or 744 so that is why the A343 is not obsolete for LH, but I was wondering if they still need that large fleet of A343s -especially if you also add the fleet of Swiss to LHs fleet.
Lufthansas A343s are now at least ten years old I was thinking if it would not make sense to sell some of these now when they could get a good deal for them. Regarding the fact that ex-LH planes always sell like hot cake on the second hand market.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 10040 times:

Quoting Columba (Reply 8):

That was exactly my idea. The A333 is more efficient than the A343 on some routes that have been served or are now served with the A343.

Lufthansas A343s are now at least ten years old I was thinking if it would not make sense to sell some of these now when they could get a good deal for them. Regarding the fact that ex-LH planes always sell like hot cake on the second hand market.

For various reasons, I do not think that LH will do an early retirement of all or part of its A343 fleet......while the A333 may be more effecient that the A343 on certain missions, the costs of replacing the still young A343s with new A333s would be huge. Also consider that the second hand market for the A343 is not that strong and finding new users for 20+ A343s at this point in time would be difficult. Look how long it took Boeing to place the ex-SQ A343s, as an example.

There were rumors suggesting that some LH A343s may be transferred to Swiss in the near-term future, but beyond that, I dont think that LH will take the financial risk at this time of swapping A343s for A333s. The same is basically true over at AF.....AF also has a signficant A343 fleet now squeezed inbetween its new A332s and 772ERs, but AF is also not doing anything dramatic and retains the A343 for longer thin routes.

In the future, we are likely to see LH take a good hard look at the A350 and 787 as an A330/340 replacement in the long term.


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7058 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 10003 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 9):
In the future, we are likely to see LH take a good hard look at the A350 and 787 as an A330/340 replacement in the long term.

They already do  Wink But it is not that urgent as it is with other carriers looking for a replacement. I have mentioned this above but LH is one of the few airlines where I could think of a mixed 787/A350 order........

Would the A343 make a good freighter for Lufthansa cargo ?



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 9934 times:

Quoting Columba (Reply 10):
Would the A343 make a good freighter for Lufthansa cargo ?

I dont think so.....and LH Cargo needs are already covered by their rather large fleet of MD11Fs.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 9926 times:

While I agree that the 343 will not a good freighter make, LH Cargo's needs are far from covered.

LH was furious at Boeing for cancelling the M11F right away, and has been on the constant lookout for more frames.

N


User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 13, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 9909 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 12):
While I agree that the 343 will not a good freighter make, LH Cargo's needs are far from covered.

LH was furious at Boeing for cancelling the M11F right away, and has been on the constant lookout for more frames.

N

Absolutely correct, my bad with respect to the use of the word "covered"....I meant that LH uses the MD11F for its cargo needs and, you are of course correct that LH was very annoyed with Boeing for cancelling the MD11 program...LH was interested in acquiring more of the type.

There were rumors at one time that LH is taking a look at the 777F as its next dedicated freigher, any news on that issue?


User currently offlineFlyinTLow From Germany, joined Oct 2004, 521 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 9899 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 12):
While I agree that the 343 will not a good freighter make, LH Cargo's needs are far from covered.

LH was furious at Boeing for cancelling the M11F right away, and has been on the constant lookout for more frames.

I remember reading that LH agreed to not further expand their cargo operations anymore but keep it at the size it currently is. Don't know why. Just what I remember reading...

Cheers,
Thilo



- When dreams take flight, follow them -
User currently offlineBA319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8508 posts, RR: 55
Reply 15, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 9854 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PM (Reply 5):
I got a 9-abreast and noisy KLM 772ER instead

- Sorry, I found that very funny!! Smile The 777 is a noisy plane, whilst it may be economical, I hate them, give me a 330/340 anytime, far quieter and better cabin config due to fuselage width.



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,77L,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333
User currently offlineIMatAMS From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 317 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 9821 times:

Quoting JetMaster (Reply 4):
How exactly were they worse than any of LH's regular sub-standard equipped aircraft?

No idea, was my first (and hopefully last) time on LH longhaul. rock-hard, limited-recline seats with no head-support whatsoever. Rediculous seat-pitch.. At least from A.net pics the regular LH interior looks a liitle better than those ones.

IM


User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2173 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 9798 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

LH has been flying its 343s on medium-hauls too, like FRA-THR and FRA-Almaty. I have read in aviation mags that the 343's "saving grace" is its very low operating costs and low emissions - making it very economical on most routes... if they were not, LH and AF would have disposed of them years ago.


Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7642 posts, RR: 36
Reply 18, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 9782 times:

Quoting IMatAMS (Reply 16):
No idea, was my first (and hopefully last) time on LH longhaul. rock-hard, limited-recline seats with no head-support whatsoever. Rediculous seat-pitch.. At least from A.net pics the regular LH interior looks a liitle better than those ones.

Are those only the 2 ex-Sabena aircraft that you are referring to?



A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineMatt From Canada, joined May 1999, 693 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day ago) and read 9626 times:

Quoting ACDC8 (Reply 18):
Are those only the 2 ex-Sabena aircraft that you are referring to?

Yes, these two ex-Sabena aircraft were flown (at least until they were recently retired) mostly from FRA to YYZ and YVR. I had the "pleasure" of flying on one of them in April, and it was just awful. As IMatAMS mentionned, the seat pitch was awful, the seats were hard (and did not have the typical LH look), etc. While chatting with the flight crew in the back galley, I learned that these 2 aircraft were also despised the the crew as well for their lack of commonality and comfort comparted to the other 343s. According to them, passengers often complained about those 2 aircraft.



Next flights: YQM-YYZ-YOW v.v. / YQM-CUN v.v. / YQM-YUL-YWG v.v. / YSJ-YYZ-SEA-SFO / SFO-YYZ-YOW-YQM / YQM-YYZ-MUC-TXL /
User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7642 posts, RR: 36
Reply 20, posted (8 years 8 months 1 day ago) and read 9615 times:

Quoting Matt (Reply 19):
Yes, these two ex-Sabena aircraft were flown (at least until they were recently retired) mostly from FRA to YYZ and YVR. I had the "pleasure" of flying on one of them in April, and it was just awful. As IMatAMS mentionned, the seat pitch was awful, the seats were hard (and did not have the typical LH look), etc. While chatting with the flight crew in the back galley, I learned that these 2 aircraft were also despised the the crew as well for their lack of commonality and comfort comparted to the other 343s. According to them, passengers often complained about those 2 aircraft

Interesting. I guess I've been lucky then, all the A340 flights I've had, have been on between YVR-FRA have been on original LH airframes. Thanks for pointing that out. I assumed thats what IMatAMS meant, I wasn't sure though.



A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineAC787 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 337 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (8 years 8 months 22 hours ago) and read 9542 times:

Is it possible that some of these LH343's will make there way to Swiss? It wouls allow swiss to make some of there long haul flights daily and allow them to expand there long haul network out of zurich. I'm not sure what LH's plans are with respect to zurich expanding but it would be nice to see zurich gaining more flights. I like Munich but have always just loved flying through and too zurich, and more routes would make that even more likely.

AC787


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26376 posts, RR: 76
Reply 22, posted (8 years 8 months 22 hours ago) and read 9528 times:

Quoting Gigneil (Reply 12):
LH was furious at Boeing for cancelling the M11F right away



Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 13):
you are of course correct that LH was very annoyed with Boeing for cancelling the MD11 program...LH was interested in acquiring more of the type.

It was Lufthansa's fault for not ordering more when they had a chance



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21478 posts, RR: 60
Reply 23, posted (8 years 8 months 21 hours ago) and read 9469 times:

Quoting Matt (Reply 19):
Yes, these two ex-Sabena aircraft were flown (at least until they were recently retired) mostly from FRA to YYZ and YVR.

I flew the 343 as Sabena and I can tell you that it was a bad experience as an introduction to the type. Afterward, I had a very negative view of the 340 which makes me laugh when i hear how the 777 is less comfortable from some people. What people are really saying is that the way that their airlines of choice equips the 340 is comfortable, because Sabena demonstrated that you can make any plane a nightmare, even the "prefered" 340. Their older 747s were more comfortable by comparison, even at 3-4-3, and the 777s I flew on with DL around the same time were dreams by comparison at 2-5-2 with nothing special going for them other than not being a Sabena 343!

And the only thing worse than the Sabena 343 was the Sobelair 763 I connected to. I generally like the 767 as a pax if the plane has a newer interior, but on Sobelair, it was horrible.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineWhiteHatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 8 months 21 hours ago) and read 9397 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 22):
It was Lufthansa's fault for not ordering more when they had a chance

ordering aircraft you don't need is a guaranteed way of going bust. LH wanted more MD-11F frames when they did a rework of their cargo business, and the last ones were ordered well in advance of the shutdown. The MD-11F then became their largest aircraft as they decided to move away from the 742F due to changes in their freight business.

So your comment is incorrect. They ordered what they needed, but the need changed. That's not the same. Shame though.


25 Lp0815 : No news really, LH Cargo has been eyeing the 777F, 748F and also 380F but no decision will be taken before 2008/2009. Tendencies move from 777 to 747
26 Texdravid : Having flown LH many times over the years, I can say that the A330 is as good or better than the A340 in terms of comfort and quiet cruising. The rang
27 IMatAMS : I recall reading on this forum that they were moved to another route later, before, apparently, being sold now, so maybe you 'missed' them. I wonder
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lufthansa A340 311 Vs. 313 posted Fri Dec 29 2000 23:25:01 by Lax2000
A340-300 Vs A340-500/600 During Turbulences posted Fri Aug 4 2006 10:29:11 by LY777
VS Upper Class Suite On Their A340-300? posted Fri Mar 18 2005 08:29:03 by VScaptain
VS's A340-300's posted Sat Oct 30 2004 22:49:07 by Wheelsatc
A330-300 Vs A340-300? posted Fri Apr 9 2004 16:41:21 by Mindscape
VS Selling A340-300's? posted Sun Mar 21 2004 19:45:33 by FLY777UAL
A340-300E Vs -300 Enhanced posted Fri Feb 13 2004 17:53:04 by MaverickM11
RR Powered A330-300 Vs A340-300 posted Tue Jan 6 2004 10:23:30 by Asianguy767
VS A340-300 To Far East posted Mon Apr 14 2003 17:29:41 by Cabinboy
A340-200 Vs -300 Range Question posted Fri May 3 2002 23:46:51 by CF-CPI