Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Part Answer To UA's Woes?  
User currently offlineSimpilicity From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

UA should do a Qantas (QF is going to ramp up Jetstar International & use wide bodies for routes of less than 10 hours, that they can't make money on with their high overheads or have already pulled out of).

QF will drop SYD/HNL. This is not recent news. HNL is a good point of entry to USA, as it avoids awful LAX. SFO not much better.

HNL is also a good point of entry to Canada (why don't the US reintroduce transit lounges at HNL for Canadian bound flights from Australia. It's really annoying to have to go thru U.S. customs at HNL (these people must go thru SALES PREVENTION TEAM TRAINING or it it the time of day that flights from OZ arrive say as AC, that they seem so happy, NOT) & then have to go thru same bs at YVR.

UA could surely use some of "parked" aircraft, under a different banner, like a Jestar Int, but all under same AOC etc.

They could call it something completely different & even get rid of US flag on side of aircraft & somehow change registration to something else. Lots of people don't want to fly U.S. carriers & if you don't want to fly a US carrier from Australia, doesn't leave much ... QF, or, NZ via AKL, or, via Asia the long way, with overnight en route.

It could be run separately as a low cost long haul airline, but using all UA infrastructure, with res online or pay extra to do it over phone, UA checkin, maintenance, baggage handling.

Would be nice to fly from HNL to points in the USA/Canada (with only stop in HNL) without having to go via awful LAX !!!

Flights could go from various cities in Australia (not necessarily SYD or MEL) to HNL & if enough aircraft were used could all arrive at HNL at same time & hub there, eg. if they used a 747

CNS/HNL (old QF route)

BNE/HNL (old QF & 2T route)

PER/HNL (never flown before)

ADL/HNL (never flown before)

with flights HNL/4 north american cities, either not currently served from HNL or only served lightly.

Even if they used only 1 aircraft, it could still work as pax could stopover at HNL.

Aircraft could be configured in 2 (or 2 1/2 classes), a business/club class, Y class & possibly a Y class with a bit more legroom/seat width, ie. if a 747, instead of 3-4-3 in premium economy, could go say 3-3-3 ???

There must be hundreds of thousands of cheap seats sitting in aircraft in the desert ???

Anyway, lets here why it would or wouldn't work ???

Anyone out there from UA with a comment ???

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1472 times:

Quoting Simpilicity (Thread starter):
Anyway, lets here why it would or wouldn't work ???

Because having a low-cost longhaul airline never has or will.

Signed,
PeoplExpress


User currently offlineMarshalN From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2005, 1521 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1456 times:

We'll see what happens with Oasis!

User currently offlineSimpilicity From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1445 times:

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 1):
Because having a low-cost longhaul airline never has or will.

QF's not that smart, but at least guys at QF realise low cost long haul is the next big thing.

Quoting MarshalN (Reply 2):
We'll see what happens with Oasis!

If they handle it right, they'll grow the market enormously & steel a little market share from CX. There's going to be a lot of 744's entering the used market in the next year or 3 & volume will depress values.


User currently offlineUadc8contrail From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1782 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 1):
Because having a low-cost longhaul airline never has or will.

Signed,
PeoplExpress

DLKAPA,
now that is funny Smile



bus driver.......move that bus:)
User currently offlineSimpilicity From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 1416 times:

Quoting Uadc8contrail (Reply 4):
now that is funny

Lots of groups looking at low cost long haul including QF, DJ, Ryanair etc. etc.

It has to be the next big thing !!!

Most of the world has now experienced short haul low cost & it's not that different from the legacy's short haul, so the natural extension is long cost long haul.

Is not new, but hasn't been done in a big way yet. Interestingly, Canada has had 2 long haaul low cost. 2T have gone but TS are still making money but doen't appear to be expanding much (or am I wrong). Would have thought they would have seen the potential for YVR/AUSTRALIA flights, especially as AC now have 2 x 767's 90 minutes apart up to 7 days a week this time of year. (gee that's effecient, NOT).

UA could start on routes to Australia & then expand to Asia & then Europe. This would partly counter any high density A380's that have been talked about.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26444 posts, RR: 75
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1350 times:

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 1):
Because having a low-cost longhaul airline never has or will.

Signed,
PeoplExpress

It does succeed if other airlines don't play dirty tricks.

Signed,
Freddy Laker



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineSimpilicity From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1336 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 6):
t does succeed if other airlines don't play dirty tricks.

Of course it will thats why QF's talking about long haul Junkstar Int.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is This Worth Writing To UA About? posted Thu Dec 7 2006 06:25:04 by FSPilot747
What Happened To UA Flight 811 Airframe? posted Wed Sep 20 2006 08:34:14 by Call911mfc
Baggage Transfer AK To MH To UA (Possible?) posted Wed Aug 16 2006 23:54:55 by Seamefly
A Small Thank You To UA posted Fri May 26 2006 20:12:31 by JBLUA320
Air Wisconsin- Prior To UA Express posted Sun Mar 12 2006 22:01:34 by TheFlyGuy2
Some Thanks To UA/OO SFO/DEN/COS Crews Tonight posted Sun Dec 18 2005 12:10:11 by Symphonik
What Happened To UA, ORD-EZE? posted Mon Nov 7 2005 02:50:36 by ContinentalEWR
Any Word On Updates To UA C-Class? posted Thu Aug 11 2005 00:20:26 by MCIFlyer
So What's Going To Happen To UA After Tuesday? posted Mon May 30 2005 04:08:51 by Aeroman62
Fresh Air Answer To Inflight Diseases posted Sat Mar 12 2005 01:49:53 by 777ER