Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Single Long Haul Widebody Type For BA  
User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3749 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2339 times:

In the far off future is it likely that BA could go for a single widbody type for all its long haul routes from LON-NYC to LON-SYD, assuming one stop, or is the possible loss in revenue more than the saving in simplification?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2249 times:

There are very few airlines that adopt this approach, precisely because most airlines fly routes that vary significantly in the frequency required and number of pax that need to be carried. For example, BA operate a single daily flight MAN-JFK using just a 767 and 7-8 daily flights LHR-JFK using mainly 747s with occasional 777s. They have these multiple a/c types to fit this mixture of capacity and frequency.

Of course there would be benefits to only having a single type of aircraft, but the disadvantages would far outweigh them.


User currently offlineBA380 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 1466 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2202 times:

with (I think) 112 or so long-haul a/c (57 744s, 43 777s and around a dozen long-haul 767s), BA have more than enough a/c to operate multiple types at scale. Their 744 and 777 fleets on their own are bigger than many airlines' total long haul fleets.

If they were to do this, I suspect it would be the 773, but personally, I don't see any pressing need to move to a single fleet - the 773 would be too big for many 772 routes and unnecessarily remove capacity from 744 routes with good loads.



cabin crew: doors to automatic and cross-check...
User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2815 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2173 times:

No way. BA has a huge fleet. The only benefit from single types is the commonality and simplification of fleet-wide operating costs. The costs associated with the operating a type is amortised over the fleet. BA's fleet is so large that these costs are relatively low per frame. The loss of flexibility in having only a single type is orders of magnitude more significant than the gains in simplification, which are minor given the numbers of each type they have.

User currently offlineRichardw From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 3749 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2069 times:

Very good answer Glom, thanks.

User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1855 times:

Ostensibly, the Boeing 777 in all its variants (773ER, 772ER and 772LR) could do the trick (with of course, added frequencies on some routes that mandate multiple 744s daily).

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Long Haul Flights Dangerous For Health posted Wed Mar 10 2004 16:07:13 by Dutchflyer
BA Long Haul Deliveries For 2008/09? posted Tue Oct 17 2006 17:27:10 by BALAX
Why No Leather Seats For BA Long Haul? posted Wed Sep 6 2006 19:23:42 by 8herveg
BA Eyes Airbus For The Long Haul, A380 posted Fri Jan 21 2005 10:10:34 by KEESJE
Long Haul Options For BA. posted Sat Dec 18 2004 19:12:12 by Aerlingus330
Qantas Or BA For Long Haul Flight? posted Wed Jun 2 1999 12:31:12 by Ansett767
BA 767s Long Haul posted Fri Dec 1 2006 14:32:54 by Albird87
No More Funding For Scottish Long Haul Flights posted Sun Sep 10 2006 21:42:58 by Humberside
Could BA Use Their 757's On Long Haul Routes? posted Mon Jul 24 2006 18:44:30 by Gilesdavies
BA B767 G-BNWC Joins Long Haul Operations posted Wed Jul 19 2006 13:53:44 by Psimpson