Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CO Transpacific  
User currently offlineIshky15 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 717 posts, RR: 12
Posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1169 times:

I know that some of you think of me as quite inquisitive about CO, but I have just one more question.

What's the deal with CO's traspacific ops? Do they paln to offer any more flts, because it does seem like they are the smallest US carrier transpacific wise. Being New York as the world's highest Biz destination and its commonality of commerce with Japan, I would expect to see othe flts besides NRT to places like NGO and KIX. Not just Japan, but does CO ever plan on going transpacific to other Asian destinations? The NY area's only nonstop service besides Tokyo is to SEL.

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1095 times:

It definately is an interesting question. I think that the problem lies more with the acquisition of slots at Pacific Rim airports. The two major U.S. carriers across the pacific United and Northwest control a large portion of the slots given to the U.S. carriers.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1084 times:

Apart from the slots, which are essential to the argument and Continental does indeed lack them
as pointed out above, the airline has a shortage
of widebody jets that are capable of flying such
ranges. With nearly all the 777's committed to
the Atlantic or Tokyo region, its unlikely more
routes to Asia will open up soon.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineKlwright69 From Saudi Arabia, joined Jan 2000, 2046 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1066 times:

CO applied for Newark-Osaka awhile ago. Remember, they just can't start service to any of these countries at any time they feel like it. There is a long procedure, without gurantee of success.

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1046 times:

I was wondering if due to the shortage of capacity that CO may order more 777-224ERs or possibly the 777-200LR? Also, what do you think of the 747-400X's chance with CO? The 747-400X is an updated version of the 747-400 with a 777 like interior and cockpit along with other improvements like the 747-400F wing etc... The aircraft has the same capacity as the -400 but has the capability of carrying more payload or having a greater range.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1019 times:

I think Continental might consider ordering more 777's, depending on how
the 767-400 works into the fleet. I don't think Continental will go for the
747-400 or the 747-400X (too much capacity for them) but its hard to say.
They might lease more 777's (i think at least two of the 16 in the fleet are
leased). The performance of the 767-400 as semi long-haul aircraft will be
key in Continental's future widebody fleet planning. If Continental decides
that the 777's on some routes to Europe like Manchester or Madrid might
be better utilized elsewhere, then that will affect their decisions.

I'm rambling. Basically, I don't know. I would say that the likelihood of a
777 order is greater than that of a 747.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlineAFa340-300E From France, joined May 1999, 2084 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 982 times:

Hello,

Can anyone tell me when the applied for the EWR-KIX route please?

Thanks,

Best regards,
Alain Mengus


User currently offlineIshky15 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 717 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (14 years 2 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 965 times:

I dont know when they applied, but does anyone know if their rights can be taken away? I dont believe that KIX is a slot-controlled airport, so the only reason that they aren't currently operating the route must be to their "widebody shortage". Why would CO apply for that route if they didn't plan to operate it? Will they?

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CO 1832 - IAH-LGA Mechanical Issues On Landing posted Mon Jun 22 2009 15:24:48 by Planeguy727
Is NW/DL's Check-In Similar To CO's? posted Mon Jun 22 2009 02:41:02 by LASoctoberB6
CO And BA Partners? posted Sun Jun 21 2009 10:53:42 by COEWRNJ
CO 33 Question posted Thu Jun 18 2009 11:38:31 by MKrausIAH
CO Pilot Dies In Flight, BRU-EWR posted Thu Jun 18 2009 08:03:34 by Klwright69
CO Biofuel Flight Results posted Wed Jun 17 2009 08:28:36 by LAXDESI
CO 9 EWR-NRT Diverting Back To EWR 6-16 posted Tue Jun 16 2009 20:11:05 by Falcon84
OAG Changes 6/12/09: AM/AS/B6/CO/DL/ED/F9/NW/SY posted Thu Jun 11 2009 12:11:22 by Enilria
NYC-Edinburgh Service, Only CO now? posted Thu Jun 11 2009 10:10:49 by BACCALA
CO CLE Sets Baggage Record posted Wed Jun 10 2009 22:15:14 by Cle757