Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is A Bigger Alliance Better?  
User currently offlinePeter From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 570 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1654 times:

Here are some quotes about Sky Team that I found in the June 26, 2000 issue of Delta's employee magazine. Delta's exdecutine vice president and chief marketing officer said this one. "We're focused on where people want to travel, not making grandiose statements about how big we are." Delta CEO Leo Mullin said the next one. "Sky Team will distinguish itself and win the loyalty of international air trabelers by building not the biggest alliance in the world, but the best alliance with the best network."

In the September 1999 issue of Air Transport World, The Air France CEO said that in order not to become "too complicated," Sky Team will include no more than "six or seven members."

Do you think that Sky Team should try to become as big a possible, or do you agree with what these people said?

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineStratifier From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

One way to look at it is that, if Skyteam doesn't mention something (which they possess, that other alliances don't have), there'd be nothing left for them to talk about.

But right now it makes sense, because I think Star Alliance is taking on all the members they don't really need in terms of coverage. Maybe a deeper look into the members will show us that Singapore and ANA are necessary members, but right now SQ means a big overlap with TG's routes. Plus Changi becoming the alliance's hub in the region. Hence TG talking about leaving for Skyteam lately. This has been mentioned in the local papers in Thailand.

There are certainly enough carriers around for Skyteam to choose, and build good coverage with. Yet politics somewhere down the road may stop it from making the right decision network-wise.

Personally I don't really care for alliances... if I fly a certain airline for something most others don't offer, I'd do everything to avoid codeshare.

User currently offlineHappy777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1597 times:

I think in some ways it is and other ways it is not, because if you keep expanding and expanding, you will end up having airlines that compete with each other who are in the same alliance,so that could really tear you apart, but if you are bigger, that means more binefits for passengers(airline lounges,more miles etc) so I honestly think that a bigger alliance is better but you have to watch where airline enter from(what market) because you could have two or more members that compete with each other but they are in the same alliance.I could go either way

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Bigger Is NOT Always Better! posted Fri Sep 28 2001 22:49:29 by Md11_man
United & American At LAX & ORD....which Is Bigger? posted Mon Oct 23 2006 20:12:28 by 8herveg
Which Is Bigger CO Or The New US? posted Tue Apr 25 2006 02:35:11 by Ludavid777
Is Star Alliance "arrogant" In Who They Choose? posted Mon Apr 17 2006 04:56:38 by Legacyins
Which Is Bigger Disappointment? posted Sat Dec 17 2005 01:14:23 by ER757
Is Bigger More Efficient In Terms Of Fuel Per Pax? posted Sun Oct 16 2005 17:11:01 by Dougloid
Who Is Bigger @ ORD? posted Wed Jun 29 2005 17:32:06 by Lufthansa
Who Is Bigger: AF/KL Or LH/LX? posted Wed Apr 13 2005 18:06:56 by Poh2
SA: When Is Star Alliance Start Up? posted Tue Mar 1 2005 01:58:55 by Grude1087
Is MH A330 Better Or B777 posted Sun Feb 1 2004 10:50:56 by 744