I think that 767 is generally regarded as too small and too slow for most transPacific routes and , even at it's best it is still a relatively short range a/c ( better than 737 and 757 but way shorter range than 744 and 777 variants)
Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
YOWza From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 4830 posts, RR: 16 Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3191 times:
I think the reason AC have so many 767s cross the pacific is a shortage of newer birds with the range needed. It will be nice to see the new metal in AC colours. I still don't beleive WestJet flies a 737 to Hawaii from YVR.