Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Smoothness Of Flight On The Twin V/s Quad  
User currently offlineDeaphen From India, joined Jul 2005, 1426 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3782 times:

To start, i wanna say that this thread is NOT INTENDED TO START A FLAME between the twin lovers and the quad lovers. Personally i have flown both many times and i noticed a difference in the smoothness of the flight. I flew DEL-SIN then SIN-SFO on a SQ 772ER. I was petrefied of flying at that time and had a terrible time while flying to SFO. Mainly because the T7 was bumpy and very turbulant. Let me point out again, it is a personal view nothing more!! Anyways, on the way back, i flew VS from SFO to LHR then LHR to DEL, this was done on a A340 and 747. Since both are quads and i found them to be much smoother, i was much more relaxed on them. Any reason why there is such a difference? Agreed both machines are absolutely beautiful, but i want to hear comments on this from others and thei opinion on the subject.
Cheers
Deaphen


I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJush From Germany, joined Apr 2005, 1636 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3767 times:

Don't you think that your flight bumpiness had something to do with weather conditions and turbulences?
I reckon there is no such thing in a difference though i'm not a professional and i cannot explain it physically.
But i think modern twins or quads are all around the same thing in terms of smoothness.

Don't forget this is just an assessment and no fact i could be wrong.

Regds
jush



There is one problem with airbus. Though their products are engineering marvels they lack passion, completely.
User currently offlineCxsjr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3759 times:

Never noticed it and have flown both two and four engines many times so the difference can't be that much either way? Talk to me about that fabulous fairground feeling when an MD11 levels at 5,000 ft on climb out, well that's a different matter!!

User currently onlineZKSUJ From New Zealand, joined May 2004, 7107 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3751 times:

I too find the quads in particular the 744s the more stable, but then again I may have been blessed with smooth conditions whilst in those aircraft as opposed to other twins.

User currently offlineDeaphen From India, joined Jul 2005, 1426 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3751 times:

hey yea it could have been, but i have noticed that a few times after that too. Hence i ask  Smile Just curious.

Thanks anyways.
 Smile



I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
User currently offlineGlideslope From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1617 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3749 times:

Quoting Deaphen (Thread starter):
To start, i wanna say that this thread is NOT INTENDED TO START A FLAME between the twin lovers and the quad lovers. Personally i have flown both many times and i noticed a difference in the smoothness of the flight. I flew DEL-SIN then SIN-SFO on a SQ 772ER. I was petrefied of flying at that time and had a terrible time while flying to SFO. Mainly because the T7 was bumpy and very turbulant. Let me point out again, it is a personal view nothing more!! Anyways, on the way back, i flew VS from SFO to LHR then LHR to DEL, this was done on a A340 and 747. Since both are quads and i found them to be much smoother, i was much more relaxed on them. Any reason why there is such a difference? Agreed both machines are absolutely beautiful, but i want to hear comments on this from others and thei opinion on the subject.
Cheers
Deaphen

I'd suggest a Land/Sea Ticket next time.  Smile



To know your Enemy, you must become your Enemy.” Sun Tzu
User currently offlineDeaphen From India, joined Jul 2005, 1426 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3745 times:

Wouldnt the weight of the aircraft have anything to do with the bumpiness? ofcourse turbulance aside, u would expect a heavier plane (quad) to naturally be smoother than a twin..


I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
User currently offlineDeaphen From India, joined Jul 2005, 1426 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3741 times:

Quoting Glideslope (Reply 5):
I'd suggest a Land/Sea Ticket next time.

Lol haha.. i wouldnt mind.. how would that help tho ?  Smile



I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
User currently offlineDeaphen From India, joined Jul 2005, 1426 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3735 times:

Btw talking bout heavies... SQ will be the first to fly the A380 right? and i hear its going to be on their Sin-Syd route? correct me if im wrong.. how do i manage to get onto the first commercial flight?


I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
User currently offlineGrbld From Netherlands, joined Dec 2005, 353 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3715 times:

Quoting Deaphen (Reply 8):
Btw talking bout heavies... SQ will be the first to fly the A380 right? and i hear its going to be on their Sin-Syd route? correct me if im wrong.. how do i manage to get onto the first commercial flight?

Hey Deaphen, you're hijacking your own thread!  Smile

On topic, the bigger the aircraft, the more stable it flies through the same level of turbulence. The design of the airframe and wings, the amount of fuel in the wings (dampening factor) have more to do with how smooth if flies than the number of engines. The 747 airframe is completely different from the 777 airframe. For a good comparison, you'd have to compare the A330 and A340.

Grbld


User currently offlineFinnWings From Finland, joined Oct 2003, 640 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3690 times:

Being a professional pilot myself I can guarantee that there is hardly any correlation of the number of engines and smoothness of flight. Generally speaking you can say that heavier aircraft is more stable at least what comes to the effect of wind. Things which influence more for your travel experience is the weather and location where you are seated on board. Near the center of gravity (slightly aft of wing leading edge) the relative movement of aircraft is less than in the aft or nose of the aircraft. Especially yawing motion is sometimes very easily noticeable in the aft.

To make things simple, try to take a pen and keep it level and balanced between your fingers from the halfway. Now, moving the pen every direction you can see that the pen is moving faster further away from the point where you are touching it. In a real life your aircraft is exactly like a pen but a little bit longer.  Smile

On the technical side the overall design of the wing has a little bit effect for the smoothness of the ride as well and how the wing behaves in turbulence. Some of these are load factor of the wing, flexibility, sweep angle etc...

I hope this helps!

Best Regards,
FinnWings


User currently offlineGlareskin From Netherlands, joined Jun 2005, 1307 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3626 times:

The 777 flies smoothly in turbulence skies too. Subjectively you might experience the A340 smoother in the same air because of the lower noise levels in the cabin. Objectively this has nothing to do with how smooth it moves through the air.....

But in order of handling your fear of flying in turbulent weather. In general you could say that big widebodies are not as sensitive to winds and turbulence as smaller aircraft.



There's still a long way to go before all the alliances deserve a star...
User currently offlineDeaphen From India, joined Jul 2005, 1426 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3537 times:

Quoting Glareskin (Reply 11):

The 777 flies smoothly in turbulence skies too. Subjectively you might experience the A340 smoother in the same air because of the lower noise levels in the cabin. Objectively this has nothing to do with how smooth it moves through the air.....

Well to be honest, i did feel a significant difference between the 340 and the 777.
I dont think it has anything to do with cabin noise.
Though the 777 is definately fun to fly on being so technologically savy!



I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
User currently offlineSpacecadet From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3629 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3419 times:

It's not logical that a four-banger would be smoother than a two-banger. A four-engine a/c is obviously creating twice as many eddies behind its engines as a two-engine a/c, and those eddies are closer to the airplane's fuselage. I don't know where you sat in both of the four-engine planes you flew on, but sit in the back of a 747 sometime - it's an adventure, even in smooth skies. There's an almost constant vibration back there, any minor turbulence gets amplified, and the yaw dampers kick in pretty violently at times.

A two-engine aircraft should be smoother, all else being equal. If it wasn't for you, it's got more to do with the specific conditions you were flying through and your seating position than anything else.

I'd rather fly on a four-engine plane than a two-engine plane over any distance, but I don't think they're any smoother. The overwing section of a 747 is naturally smoother than most planes because it's a bigger airplane, but it's got nothing to do with the number of engines. The front of a 747 usually seems to *feel* smoother because you don't get any engine noise or vibration at all, really, though actual turbulence is a bit greater than it is over the wings.



I'm tired of being a wanna-be league bowler. I wanna be a league bowler!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
When Was The Last 747sp Flight On The LAX-SYD? posted Sun Jun 25 2006 01:20:29 by 747400sp
I Saw A Lot Of Contrails On The Sky... posted Thu Oct 20 2005 18:13:55 by Musapapaya
Economic Impact Of Airbus On The US Economy posted Mon Oct 17 2005 18:42:00 by Flying-Tiger
The Taking Of Flight 847: The Uli Derickson Story posted Thu Jun 30 2005 04:34:39 by Jetpixx
Impact Of Aviation On The World. posted Tue Mar 8 2005 21:30:47 by Dan2002
Future Of Aviation On The Iberian Peninsular posted Sun Jul 18 2004 00:50:45 by JoFMO
Century Of Flight On Discovery Next Week. posted Sat Dec 6 2003 03:50:03 by Solnabo
My 50th Flight On The D-AIAU "Bocholt" posted Sun Oct 20 2002 19:20:17 by Andreas
Value Of Planes On The Balance Sheets. posted Mon Dec 17 2001 11:51:03 by LMML 14/32
Where Can I Get The History Of Delta On The Net? posted Fri Dec 14 2001 03:21:52 by DeltaBoy777